On 23/10/2019 23:34:16, Richard Musil wrote:
Can we agree on the reply from Serhiy and close this discussion?
The proposed change does not bring any advantage apart from few saved
keystrokes and even that is questionable, because it makes the code
more prone to misreading/misinterpretation.
> If you can get by with a single literal list of words, write it once.
> ...if it's long enough to be annoying or becomes a maintenance burden,
use the `split()` idiom.
> ...if that's considered a "hack" or "bad form", then run it in the shell
once and copy/paste the result.
> ...if it might get m
