Hi
How about something like:
>>> def t1(*argv):
... value = 0
... for n in argv:
... value *= 1_000
... value += n
... return value
>>> t1(123, 456, 789)
123456789
Similarly, for define t2 to use 1_000_000, t3 to use 1_000_000_000 and so
on, instead of 1_000. For rea
> How about something like:
>
> >>> def t1(*argv):
> ... value = 0
> ... for n in argv:
> ... value *= 1_000
> ... value += n
> ... return value
>
> >>> t1(123, 456, 789)
> 123456789
>
> Similarly, for define t2 to use 1_000_000, t3 to use 1_000_000_000 and so on,
>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:09:16 +
Jonathan Fine wrote:
> How about something like:
>
> >>> def t1(*argv):
> ... value = 0
> ... for n in argv:
> ... value *= 1_000
> ... value += n
> ... return value
>
> >>> t1(123, 456, 789)
> 123456789
>
> Similarly, for define t2
Dan Sommers wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:09:16 +
> Jonathan Fine jfine2...@gmail.com wrote:
> > How about something like:
> > def t1(argv):
> > ... value = 0
> > ... for n in argv:
> > ... value = 1_000
> > ... value += n
> > ... return value
> > t1(123, 456, 789)
Hi,
Similarly to argparse.FileType, people find themselves writing the
same checks over and over when getting directories from the CLI (and
more generally, paths) and it seems this could be simplified directly
in argparse. I suggest leveraging pathlib to add a new Path argument
type.
I wrote a dr
