On May 15, 2020, at 21:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> I know you winked there, but frankly, there isn't a clear most Pythonic API
>> here. Surely you do'nt think PYhton should have no methods?
>
> That's not what I said.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 10:46:25 -0400
> David Mertz wrote:
> >
> > > 1. +1 itertools.zip_strict function
> > > 2. +1 zip.strict(*args)
> > > 3. +1 zip(*args, mode='strict') # mode='shortest' by default
> > > 4. +0 zip(*args, strict=T
On May 15, 2020, at 21:35, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:44:59PM -0700, Andrew Barnert wrote:
>
>> Once you go with a separate view-creating function (or type), do we even
>> need the dunder?
>
> Possibly not. But the beauty of a protocol is that it can work even if
>
On 05/16/2020 01:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:46:43PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
For me:
* zip(strict=True) +1
* zip(mode='strict') -0
* itertools.zip_strict() -0.5
* zip.strict() -1 (but really, I'd like to make this -1e10)
I spent a signi
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 1:26 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > * zip(strict=True) +1
> > * zip(mode='strict') -0
> > * itertools.zip_strict() -0.5
> > * zip.strict() -1 (but really, I'd like to make this -1e10)
>
> I spent a significant amount of time and mental energy explaini
So, this thread has stalled, but I saw no contrary opinions to a
decorator like this.
I think the plain version (not treating positional only arguments differently,
no partially-initialized namespace, no annotations based auto-argument cast)
could make it into a bpo -
what do you say?
On Wed, 6
Thanks for the support Joao, obviously I would be keen to have it in. Happy to
help out with the PRs and reviews etc. if it does go ahead
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.o
On 5/16/2020 2:35 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
So, this thread has stalled, but I saw no contrary opinions to a
decorator like this.
I think the plain version (not treating positional only arguments differently,
no partially-initialized namespace, no annotations based auto-argument cast)
could ma
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:07 PM Eric V. Smith wrote:
> But my question is: If this technique has been available for 12 years,
> why is it not more popular?
>
Because linters will not recognise a third party solution. Personally I've
written code like:
```
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
self
> PS. Why wasn't a new builtin zip_strict() on the menu? I think I would
have given it at least +0.5, because of this rule of thumb.
I would think that if zip_strict() added as a builtin, then zip_longest()
should too.
And the fact that zip_longest was not added as a builtin made me think that
it
10 matches
Mail list logo
