> If there was some way to make
>@syms x, y
> translate to x, y = syms('x, y') or something like that then that
> would be great. Maybe that doesn't have broad enough use for Python
> the language but I would certainly add something like that if I was
> providing a SymPy UI based on a modified
This thread kind of took a turn to bikeshed, and thats probably my fault, I
apologize.
I would like to get back to the original question which is, can we revisit
PEP 501? What can I do to get this to happen? What is the process for
revisiting existing deferred PEPs?
Nick
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 4
(PEP 501 is titled "General purpose string interpolation")
It's unlikely that the SC would reconsider PEP 501 as-is.
Probably the best way forward is to consider the existing PEP 501 as food
for thought, and write up a new proposal that aims to solve some of the
same problems in a way that avoids
On 5/20/2021 5:41 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Matt del Valle writes:
> Fully agreed on the sentiment that we shouldn't treat compile-time
> literals differently from runtime operations.
But as you just pointed out, we do. Literals are evaluated at compile
time, operations at runtime. "
