Dom Grigonis writes:
> Why would this not be a good option? 1 extra line compared to
> walrus, but no DRY issue.
> with open(“fn") as f:
> while True:
> line = f.readline()
> if line and check(line):
> process(line)
> else:
> break
Wo
The fact that it is not allowed is nothing to do with the 'return'. You
*can* write
return (x := x+1)
What you can't (at present) do is use the walrus operator with an attribute:
x = (self.a := self.a + 1) # SyntaxError
I too have found times when this would be convenient.
As Stephen says
