Hmm, agreed. BTW, I think the current download page is *way* too complicated
for new comers.
There should be a giant button for the latest 3.x/64 (platform sniffed),
and below it a more subtle button for the "LTS" 2.X/32.
The rest of the choices and text should be pushed to another page
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 28 January 2017 at 02:11, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> > I can't articulate it we'll, or even fully isolate the reasons for it.
> All I
> > really know is how I feel when peers ask me about Python or
On 07.02.2017 00:46, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:29:17AM +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how useful this would be in the stdlib,
>> since it's very much tied to whatever float type Python
>> happens to use on a platform.
>
> With the possible exception of
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:29:17AM +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I'm not sure how useful this would be in the stdlib,
> since it's very much tied to whatever float type Python
> happens to use on a platform.
With the possible exception of µPy, are there any Python implementations
which don't
Do you mean something like:
isclose(f(x), 0.0, rel_tol, abs_tol)
If so, what should `rel_tol` and `abs_tol` be?
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 06.02.2017 13:22, Juraj Sukop wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, M.-A. Lemburg
On 06.02.2017 13:22, Juraj Sukop wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>>
>> Juraj: Could you provide some use cases, where such a function
>> would help in Python applications ? (I can see use cases
>> written in C, but due to the low level, find it
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:29 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> Juraj: Could you provide some use cases, where such a function
> would help in Python applications ? (I can see use cases
> written in C, but due to the low level, find it hard to
> believe that people would use this at
On 04.02.2017 12:59, Stephan Houben wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Visual C++ 2015 supports this one:
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/h0dff77w.aspx
>
> In any case, this is easy to implement an efficient fallback in C, unlike
> the fma() function we discussed some time ago.
>
> To put this