On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:23:31PM +0200, Yanghao Hua wrote:
> Is this (<== and ==>) something can be made into CPython?
If it goes into CPython, eventually every other Python needs to do the
same.
Of course it *could* be put into Python, but you haven't given
sufficient justification for why
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:01 AM James Lu wrote:
>
> https://github.com/graalvm/graalpython
> https://www.python.org/download/alternatives/
>
> GraalPython is an implementation on the Truffle VM, by Oracle Labs. The
> Truffle
> VM gives Python high-performance interoperability with other
https://github.com/graalvm/graalpython
https://www.python.org/download/alternatives/
GraalPython is an implementation on the Truffle VM, by Oracle Labs. The
Truffle
VM gives Python high-performance interoperability with other languages-
including JVM, LLVM, Ruby, and JavaScript. The Truffle VM is
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:49 AM Ricky Teachey wrote:
>
> Can I offer an alternative suggestion?
>
> How about these arrow operators, which despite being 3 characters, look
> pretty nice, and are not currently valid python:
>
> a <== b <== c
> a ==> b ==> c
>
> Perhaps __larrow__ and __rarrow__
> I think the idea for using the left arrow is a non-starter, since it's
> already valid Python syntax to write
>
> x <- 3
>
> today. ("-" being a unary operator and all).
>
> That said, I would be really happy to have a clean way to write HDL in
> Python, so good luck! Time to check out MyHDL...
