On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:30 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>
> Regarding the usage of a decorator to do the auto-assignment, I think that
> it has an issue regarding how to select a subset of the variables that you
> would be setting. In the general case, you can probably get away with
> calling
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> There is no need for a whole new syntax for what can trivially be
> accomplished by a decorator,
> and a simple one, in this cases.
> I for one am all for the inclusion of a decorator targeting either the
> __init__ method
> or the class itself to perform this binding of
Greg Ewing writes:
> Even if you do, it's still an arbitrary choice to prefer the leftmost
> method, which might be what you want or might not.
Yep, i 100% agree with you, and that's (one of) my problems with current MI in
python, and the reason i named that thread MRO and super don't feel so
Regarding the usage of a decorator to do the auto-assignment, I think that
it has an issue regarding how to select a subset of the variables that you
would be setting. In the general case, you can probably get away with
calling `autoassign`. But, for example, if you want to set a but not b,
you'd
