Hello everyone, I am Pablo from Argentina! This is my first email here, so
just let me know if I am missing anything that is of use in this list, such
as presenting myself. As for this topic in particular:
Although I might use it a lot (more than I would like to admit), I don't
like this feature.
I don't know how or even whether this would be possible ootb. On one side,
I do really like the idea; on the other hand, it kind of seems like going
down a bumpy road (as you said, datetimes? filepaths?urls?). And the
de-serialization would not be easy.
What if we added a function call for the ser
Hey everyone. I have been looking into asyncio lately, and even though I
have had my fair share of work, I still have some of it very shaky, so
first of all forgive me if what I am saying here is already implemented and
I totally missed it (so far, it looks *really* likely).
Basically this is the
The problem of assigning init arguments as attributes has appeared several
times in the past (
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VLI3DOFA5VWMGJMJGRDC7JZTRKEPPZNU/
was the most recent we could find) and is already handled in dataclasses.
Lately, discussing this t
dy accomplish? I understand that it’s the
> reverse— with a dataclass, you specify the fields, and the __init__ is
> generated, whereas this proposal is ttt be at you’d write an __init__, and
> the attributes would be set — but other than taste, is there a practical
> difference?
>
&
Hey Joao! For what it's worth, I'm not a big fan of the proposal to be
honest, for the reasons I have already mentioned. I'm not heavily against
it, but I would most likely not use it. Nevertheless, I believe it would
need a PEP since it probably can change substantially the way Python code
is bein
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 7:33 PM Josh Rosenberg <
shadowranger+pythonid...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:31 PM Pablo Alcain
> wrote:
>
>>
>> About dataclasses, the point that Chris mentions, I think that they are
>> in a different scope from
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022, 1:11 PM Christopher Barker
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:53 AM Pablo Alcain
> wrote:
>
>> Overall, I think that not all Classes can be thought of as Dataclasses
>> and, even though dataclasses solutions have their merits, they probably
>>
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 10:35 AM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 5/1/22 00:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>
>
> >> It shows that out of 20k analyzed classes in the selected libraries
> (including black,
> >&g
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:21 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 06:22:08PM -0700, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
> > Is it unreasonable to instead suggest generalizing the assignment target
> > for parameters? For example, if parameter assignment happened left to
> > right, and allowed
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:48 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 10:34:56AM -0600, Pablo Alcain wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth,
> > the choice of the `@` was because of two different reasons: first,
> because
> > we were inspired by
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:36 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 03:04, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 07:44:14PM +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > > I have classes with 20+ parameters (packaging metadata). You can argue
> > > that a dataclass would be better, or s
12 matches
Mail list logo
