This is basically an email asking for inputs on
https://discuss.python.org/t/14210. It's not clear to me whether the
expectation is that people post in two places or just one; so I'm going to
avoid duplicating the contents here.
TLDR from that proposal: PEP 8015 had proposed an SC + Core
The line of reasoning for the packaging tooling choosing TOML is elaborated
upon in PEP 518 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0518/#other-file-formats)
and that choice was informed by a survey of the existing formats:
https://gist.github.com/njsmith/78f68204c5d969f8c8bc645ef77d4a8f.
On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 2:24 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> Among other places, Python ideas was recommended as a place to goto.
>
> In the meantime I have been discussing this on pypa/pip (mainly), and also
> on wheel and packaging. Even submitted PRs. But the PRs are only needed if
> the tag is
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 10:52 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 3:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> This thought is motivated by this bug report:
>
> https://bugs.python.org/issue35857
>
> If you import a module, then edit the .py file that goes with it, and
> then an exception occurs, the stack trace can show the wrong line.
>
> It
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:49 PM Jimmy Girardet wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Jimmy and welcome! :)
>
> I don't know if this was already debated but I don't know how to search
> in the whole archive of the list.
>
>
> For now the adoption of pyproject.toml file is more difficult because
> toml is not in
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 09:52 Nathaniel Smith, wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Al Sweigart wrote:
> > The goal of this idea is to make it easier to find out when someone has
> > installed packages for the wrong python installation. I'm coming across
> > quite a few StackOverflow posts
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 April 2018 at 21:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> Obviously dp() would have to be magic. There's no way that I know of for
>> a Python function to see the source code of its own arguments. I have
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 at 19:10 Julian DeMille via Python-ideas <
python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> Some library authors get pretty pissy about implicit imports at the root
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 09:37 Paul Moore wrote:
>
>> On 26 April 2018 at 14:29, Julian DeMille via