> On 3 Feb 2020, at 01:28, Soni L. wrote:
>
> It'd be cool to attach metadata to string literals that doesn't end up in the
> resulting string object. This metadata could be used by all sorts of tools,
> everything from localization to refactoring.
>
> In C, some localization libraries use
On 2020-02-03 03:55, Soni L. wrote:
On 2020-02-02 11:29 p.m., Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 2/2/2020 8:28 PM, Soni L. wrote:
It'd be cool to attach metadata to string literals that doesn't end up in the
resulting string object. This metadata could be used by all sorts of tools,
everything from
Why don't you define a LOCALIZE function (x → x) like in your C example?
Le lun. 3 févr. 2020 à 13:01, Soni L. a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 2020-02-02 11:29 p.m., Eric V. Smith wrote:
> > On 2/2/2020 8:28 PM, Soni L. wrote:
> >> It'd be cool to attach metadata to string literals that doesn't end
> >> up
On 2020-02-02 11:29 p.m., Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 2/2/2020 8:28 PM, Soni L. wrote:
It'd be cool to attach metadata to string literals that doesn't end
up in the resulting string object. This metadata could be used by all
sorts of tools, everything from localization to refactoring.
In C,
On 2/2/2020 8:28 PM, Soni L. wrote:
It'd be cool to attach metadata to string literals that doesn't end up
in the resulting string object. This metadata could be used by all
sorts of tools, everything from localization to refactoring.
In C, some localization libraries use macros for it, such
