I'm a bit confused here.
there have been multiple discussions on this list about having a magic
methods (maybe __json__) that could be called by the json module (or any
other) -- so that objects could define for themselves how to be encoded as
JSON.
Is this the same idea? in which case, if you
On 12/10/2020 10:08 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
The dataclass metadata feature was added for this type of use, or at
least experimenting with it:
...
I realize this isn't helpful in general, where a dataclass is a member
of another object hierarchy. But it could be leveraged by a
On 12/9/2020 10:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM sam bland wrote:
In response to the additional work required to convert the new python dataclass
using the json encoder I propose an __encode__ method that will be included in
the default dataclass attributes. This
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM sam bland wrote:
>
> In response to the additional work required to convert the new python
> dataclass using the json encoder I propose an __encode__ method that will be
> included in the default dataclass attributes. This would then be picked up by
> the
Maybe you could start by writing this as a separate decorator, to be
applied on top of the data class decorator?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 05:38 sam bland wrote:
> In response to the additional work required to convert the new python
> dataclass using the json encoder I propose an __encode__
