The way I see grouping is as an aggregation operation. As such, in my head,
grouping is similar to min/max. However, if builtins are a no-go, then I
feel I need to think a little outside the box:
Is there a possibility that there will be desired many more aggregate
functions in the near future?
s not sit terribly with me.
Cammil
On 7 April 2018 at 00:49, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:27:45PM +, Cammil Taank wrote:
> > I'm not sure if my suggestion for 572 has been considered:
> >
> > ``name! expression``
> >
&
I'm not sure if my suggestion for 572 has been considered:
``name! expression``
I'm curious what the pros and cons of this form would be (?).
My arguments for were in a previous message but there do not seem to be any
responses to it.
Cammil
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, 16:14 Guido van Rossum,
>
> ... From here,
> the most important concern and question is: Is there any other syntax
> or related proposal that ought to be mentioned here?
I am not sure if this is valid, but perhaps this is an alternative syntax
which might be simpler:
``name! expr``
So for example, instead of:
Hi,
I find a common idiom in Python is:
x = x or 'some other value'
This is highly reminiscent of the problem inplace operators solve.
Would it be a good idea to consider an inplace operator for this, perhaps:
x or= 'some other value'
?
Thanks,
Cammil
Hi,
I find a common idiom in Python is:
x = x or 'some other value'
This is highly reminiscent of the problem inplace operators solve.
Would it be a good idea to consider an inplace operator for this, perhaps:
x or= 'some other value'
?
Thanks,
Cammil
