39,7 @@ def _default_mime_types():
'.jpeg' : 'image/jpeg',
'.jpg': 'image/jpeg',
'.js' : 'application/javascript',
+'.json' : 'application/j
O, fun! Thank you for the guidance. I managed to find a Bug already
created, http://bugs.python.org/issue30824. I'll create a Pull Request
using that Bug.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:18 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 10:43 Nate. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>&
on this. There are other sources (Fluent Python book comes to
mind) that go into this in more detail.
--
Nate Lust, PhD.
Astrophysics Dept.
Princeton University
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I have been following this discussion for a long time, and coincidentally I
recently started working on a project that could make use of assignment
overloading. (As an aside it is a configuration system for a astronomical
data analysis pipeline that makes heavy use of descriptors to work around
his
There is nothing more humbling than sending nonsense out to an entire
mailing list. It will teach me to stop an process my steam of consciousness
critically instead of just firing off a message. You were right that I was
not at all considering how python variables must of course work (both
assignme
of descriptors.
If this had existed from the start or early on, it would be perfectly
natural to read and use, but for now it would be somewhat shocking (in so
far as it gets actually used) and I think that is the biggest minus.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 06/20/2019
5:10 PM Andrew Barnert wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2019, at 13:25, nate lust wrote:
>
> There is nothing more humbling than sending nonsense out to an entire
> mailing list.
>
>
> You’re something like the 300th person to suggest overloading assignment,
> but the only one of tha
things come to me over the weekend. If
anything this thread is a fun and interesting thought experiment and a
useful learning experiment for me to better understand the workings of
python, and for that I thank you for your feed back and attention.
Nate
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 6:24 PM Andrew Barn
27 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 11:19 AM nate lust wrote:
> > Typing this out though does make me think of an interesting idea. If
> there was something like __getself__ in addition to __setself__, you could
> implement things like MyInt. __getself__ would
lue that is too high
machine.c = 200
print(f"machine.c is {machine.c}")
# Omited from this proposal but present in the linked documentation are
# tools for getting the underlying variables, and or rebinding them.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:34 PM nate lust wrote:
> It probably doesn
I am happy to move this discussion to where ever is appropriate. I won't
get to it in the next few hours (bed time for my kid) so if you would like
feel free to move discussion there, and I guess I can watch this email
thread for if you do. Otherwise I will do it when I am free.
Nate
On Tue
__setself__, cloaksget
which does the same for get, and iscloaking which returns if a variable
implements any cloaking behavior.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 7:08 PM Andrew Barnert wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 14:00, nate lust wrote:
> >
> > This message is related to two previous threads
I created a discussion topic located here
https://discuss.python.org/t/a-proposal-and-implementation-to-add-assignment-and-load-overloading/1905
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:41 PM nate lust wrote:
> I am happy to move this discussion to where ever is appropriate. I won't
> get to it
hon.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/2BAURL3FSDGW543TOYM3BICOPKNGRMQM/
> Code of Conduct: http:/
a bit of spare brain power, I will
fully process what you wrote and may have additional questions.
Thank you
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 3:12 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> nate lust writes:
>
> > On first read, that may be surprising, but it
.
>
> ChrisA
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https:/
be used? So far, it just seems like an utter total mess.
>
> ChrisA
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists
; wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 13:53, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > Then in what circumstances will getself NOT be called? What is the
> > point of having an object, if literally every reference to it will
> > result in something else being used?
>
> I think Yanghao has m
ail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5IQOHCTV5F4KYHTWSYHYCF6PERZKOJ3S/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
--
Nate Lust, PhD.
Astrophysics Dept.
Princeton
w of it?
>
> ChrisA
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https:/
nction
> call doesn't).
>
> Does that change your view of it?
>
> ChrisA
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailma
sible need. It's really no harder to write 'f.new =
> mod_value()' than it is to write 'f = mod_value()' with magic behind the
> scenes.
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 11:25 AM nate lust wrote:
>
>> I think in this case, it would depend on what the metavar
D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:34:03PM -0700, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:11 PM nate lust wrote:
> > >if an instance is bound to a variable name, any attempts to rebind
> > >that name will result in a call to the __setself
ed at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/A43QPHRQ4CWMSZ4AJ2E5RCCQE3V4OG5L/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
--
Nate Lust, PhD.
Astrophysics Dept.
Princeton University
___
Python-ideas
eft to proper bench-marking programs. It seems like these numbers
are within statistical uncertainty of each other.
Nate
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:11 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:23:24PM -0400, nate lust wrote:
>
> > If you have a
> > bench ma
of
> concept implementation, we need a proof of utility application."
> ___
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail
with this proposal and I
appreciate any feedback you choose to provide. Thank you for your time in
reading this.
--
Nate Lust, PhD.
Astrophysics Dept.
Princeton University
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe
g
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TCW3TAPS6WTHGENNL2G2M5DTCKQWRJE6/
> Code of Conduct: http://pyth
All,
Most of rust is based around the idea of move semantics.
It's really useful in cases wherever you want the object to be mutable,
want to avoid side effects from something else still having a reference
unintentionally, and avoid a lot of deep copies of the underlying resources.
On the project
Yeah, in most places we just use python as you described. In a few
localized places it turned out to be useful for detecting issues and
working with external resources that were exposed through python objects.
I would not say if this proposal were included with typing that it should
be taught as c
I agree that is how python is implemented, and from a memory perspective,
this is not needed. What I was talking about was more from a conceptual
resource point of view, and not just memory as a resource.
Consider a generator, you can have many different bindings to the object,
but when it is exha
his
object after this function call it would be helpful(as I might have
forgotten behavior of functions, or simply not been paying attention).
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:53 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:15:50PM -0500, nate lust wrote:
>
> > It would be conv
ight benefit from this. But I'm not yet sufficiently
> familiar with that field to be able to point you to examples. Hopefully
> there are readers here who can. (Nate?)
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)*
> <htt
if i == 0:
continue
print(i)
Thank you for your time and consideration, we will be happy to take
any feedback or questions on the implementation.
Nate Lust
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:17 PM Pim Schellart
wrote:
> Dear Python Developers,
>
> we have a potential idea for enhancing
All,
I must say It is still exciting to be at a point of getting an official
declaration on a topic from Guido. We thank you for your time and feedback.
It has been a good experience and hope to be able to contribute in some
other way in the future.
Nate and Pim
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM
35 matches
Mail list logo
