:
Disclaimer: I haven't followed all of this discussion, so some or all of
the following may already have been expressed better (and perhaps refuted
better still).
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 08:46 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [...] we need to agree on what even the right definition of ?. is. It's
:
On 7 November 2017 at 18:53, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I find it dubious to claim that these functions are dangerous to beginners.
> The dangers are related to attacks on servers that are exposed to the
> internet and beginners have no business running servers.
I can't be
:
On 28 April 2018 at 07:07, Tim Peters wrote:
> [...] For that matter, I'd be fine too with shortening it to "let". In
> fact, I prefer that! Thanks :-)
If you really wanted to overcome objections that this looks too much
like a function, you could spell it "$". I'm not
:
On 25 March 2018 at 02:34, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [...] I think we need a short, crisp name for the new variable type.
Disposables?
-[]z.
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org