David Mayo writes:
> I mean, it's definitely possible, but I'd argue that's actually not any
> more explicit - and, in fact, args.stuff = something(args.stuff) is
> arguably less explicit because it's just an arbitrary transform, rather
> than being called out as "this is the wrapper element
I mean, it's definitely possible, but I'd argue that's actually not any
more explicit - and, in fact, args.stuff = something(args.stuff) is
arguably less explicit because it's just an arbitrary transform, rather
than being called out as "this is the wrapper element for these args."
The places
I'm not a heavy argparse user so take my opinion with a grain of salt (and
I do appreciate the time you put into proposing this), but I'm not seeing
the usefulness to classify this as so pragmatic as to outweigh adding one
more thing to explain about argparse. Since you're proposing just having a
