James Andrewartha wrote:
>> Hmm, I don't know whether I want to endorse the use of module
>> ldap.cidict. Since Python 2.3 has support for sets now this is somewhat
>> outdated.
>
> The main feature of cidict is that it's case-insensitive - I didn't
> think Python's sets were? cidict is still be
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 14:24 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Well, actually it took more time to have a running latex environment again.
>
> I've committed many modifications to ldap*.tex but not all. Please
> review. Some new module descriptions are still not in there.
Looks pretty good.
> > On
James,
Michael Ströder wrote:
>
> I've started reviewing your patches this morning and I have some doubts
> about some details which need clarification. This will take a little
> bit. I will follow-up on this when I have some spare time left. Maybe
> tomorrow...
Well, actually it took more time
James,
first of all many thanks for your efforts working on this.
James Andrewartha wrote:
>
> Is there anything else I need to do to get these applied, and the
> version of the docs on the website updated?
I've started reviewing your patches this morning and I have some doubts
about some detai
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:27 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:15 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The first patch removes an invalid LDAP option. The second updates the
> > LDAPObject documentation, and the third updates LDAPObject docstrings.
> > Hopefully
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:15 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first patch removes an invalid LDAP option. The second updates the
> LDAPObject documentation, and the third updates LDAPObject docstrings.
> Hopefully I'll have time to look at updating the rest of the docs soon.
Here's on
Hi,
The first patch removes an invalid LDAP option. The second updates the
LDAPObject documentation, and the third updates LDAPObject docstrings.
Hopefully I'll have time to look at updating the rest of the docs soon.
James Andrewartha
Index: Modules/constants.c
==
