Torsten Kurbad wrote:
> At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
> Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into
>> another project. I guess some people might be interested in that.
>>
>
> ME, ME, ME!!! :o)
>
> I tried several k
Noah Gift wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>
>> Torsten Kurbad wrote:
>>
>>> At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
>>> Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&g
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
>> with forwardable tickets. I don't think they support SPNEGO ye
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
>> with forwardable tickets.
>> I don't think they support
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>
>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>>>> python-lda
The following code does not work in a couple of different places:
import sys
import ldap, ldap.ldapobject
ldap.set_option(ldap.OPT_DEBUG_LEVEL, 255)
ldap.set_option(ldap.OPT_X_TLS_CACERTFILE, '/path/to/ca1.pem')
conn1 = ldap.ldapobject.LDAPObject('ldaps://server1.domain:636')
#conn1.set_option(lda
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to use two different CA certs in a single python-ldap
>> app?
>>
>
> There are two options:
>
> 1. Stuff all trusted CA certs into one "PEM" file and use
> lda
On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to do a search against Samba 4's LDAP server and it works,
> but the bind and search are both successful, everything hangs when I
> try to unbind from the LDAP server. If anyone could enlighten me I
> would be grateful.
>
> I've run i
On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewartha wrote:
>> On 04/02/11 03:31, Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Michael Wood wrote:
>>>> On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM,
On 02/04/2011 09:15 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> OpenLDAP 2.4.23 supports Mozilla NSS (triple licensed
>> GPLv2+/LGPLv2+/MPL) for crypto
>> Fedora 14 and later use this instead of OpenSSL
> I see some benefits using Mozilla NSS especially with LDAP
On 02/05/2011 01:42 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 4 February 2011 17:35, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
>>> On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewarthawrote:
> [...]
>>>> Debian uses GnuTLS because OpenSSL has
On 02/21/2011 02:29 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> HI!
>
> I've committed a larger patch contributed by Rich Megginson fixing SF#2829057
> [1] and adding generic support LDAPv3 extended operations. Many thanks to him.
>
> I've done some tests for [1] by successfully usin
On 03/01/2011 01:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> About the arguments and return values to result4 - with the current code
>> I have to do something like this:
>>
>> rtype, rdata, rmsgid, decoded_serverctrls, extop_rspoid,
>> extop_rsp
On 03/03/2011 01:28 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> HI!
>
> (Sigh!) I'm not a C programmer.
>
> Could somebody please look what's wrong with encode_assertion_control() in
> Modules/ldapcontrol.c? It seg faults.
err =
ldap_create_assertion_control_value(NULL,assertion_filterstr,&ctrl_val);
The NU
On 03/06/2011 06:14 PM, Chaos Eternal wrote:
should we re-implement python-ldap on pyasn and get rid of depends on
openldap libs?
I vote no. Why would you want to do that? How would you implement
TLS/SSL? How would you implement SASL/GSSAPI? How would you keep up
with openldap client li
On 03/04/2011 12:17 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> (Cc:-ed python-ldap-dev again)
>
> Chris Dukes wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Again it's time to think about the minimum required version of OpenLDAP libs
>>> to be used for building upcoming python-lda
On 03/07/2011 10:35 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>On 03/06/2011 06:14 PM, Chaos Eternal wrote:
>>> should we re-implement python-ldap on pyasn and get rid of depends on
>>> openldap libs?
>>>
>> I vote no. Why would you want t
On 03/07/2011 11:19 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> RHEL does not include pyasn1. But it is extremely useful for
>> extops/controls - doing BER codec by hand is not fun.
> Yupp!
>
>> A mid-way
>> approach would be to expose the liblber
18 matches
Mail list logo
