Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 05:27:52PM -0600, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
python setup.py build
As corrected on the blog (http://morepypy.blogspot.com/), this line
should read:
pypy setup.py build
Armin.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-list
Support
[Sent to python-list and CC'd]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:31 PM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com wrote:
Clearly the user is upset and blabbing all sorts of incendiary
nonsense but again and again the good folks at SketchUp stay calm and
always attempt to help. This is how i would like to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 2010062422432660794-angrybald...@gmailcom, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM
features, can do it for me?
SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very
On 2010-06-25 19:49 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messageslrni297ec.1m5.grahn+n...@frailea.sa.invalid, Jorgen Grahn
wrote:
I thought it was well-known that the solution is *not* to try to
sanitize the input -- it's to switch to an interface which doesn't
involve generating an intermediate
Thanks for your reply to Shashwat Anand thomas.sub( Help on finding word
is valid as per English Dictionary through python )
Let me try.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:57 PM, python-list-requ...@python.org wrote:
Send Python-list mailing list submissions to
python-list@python.org
To
On 06/25/2010 10:41 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
Surprising for a moment, if you don't
immediatelyrecognize it as a chained comparison.
(Just sharing.)
Alan Isaac
None is None is None
True
(None is None) is None
False
None is (None is None)
False
Chained comparisons - one of those
On 06/26/2010 01:35 AM, Tom Pacheco wrote:
from .. import module
or
from ..module import foo
this is intended for use within packages.
And it only works within nested packages.
Also, please refrain from top posting.
see
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/
also search for
WANG Cong:
From what you are saying, Smalltalk picks a way similar to setattr() in
Python?
addInstVarName is a method on ClassDescription objects.
Because you mentioned 'addInstVarName' which seems to be a
method or a builtin function. If so, that is my point, as I mentioned
earlier,
On 06/26/2010 10:17 AM, anu python wrote:
Thanks for your reply to Shashwat Anand thomas.sub( Help on finding
word is valid as per English Dictionary through python )
Let me try.
Please don't top post (it makes it difficult to understand what you're
replying to, and is thus
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:40:41 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I construct ad-hoc queries all the time. It really isn’t that hard to
do safely.
Wrong.
Even if you get the quoting absolutely correct (which is a very big if),
you have to remember to perform it every time, without
On Jun 25, 10:30 pm, n...@bid.nes alien8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 25, 8:42 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com wrote:
YANQUI courts were ALWAYS K A N G A R O O Courts - thats how
they carried out GENOCIDE of NATIVES !!!
You're stupid as well as
On Jun 25, 11:14 pm, Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:31:17 -0500, GrayShark wrote:
Why the rudness Terry Jan Reedy? Get up on the wrong side of the bed? Or
worse luck, no one on the other side to create a wrong side?
I see only one person
If any of you are surprised at my harshness at this YANQUI bustard,
take from me 100% that this is a SPOOOK. I have caught a real one with
a bait.
On Jun 25, 10:30 pm, n...@bid.nes alien8...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 25, 8:42 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:43:51 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
To bring this back to something remotely Python related, the point of
all this is that security is hard.
Oh, this isn't solely a security issue.
Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
probably broken a lot
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:44:36 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Please don't top post!
On 25/06/2010 15:20, Shashwat Anand wrote:
why do you need that ?
which platform are you onto ?
Prime example of an idiot.
His first line is 'Please don't top post' and what does he do
'top posts'
p.s. my mum
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
With Haskell, there's seldom a significant performance hit for using
-fvia-C, so you would probably have been able to get
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote:
I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs
faster than C,
Faster than *what* C, though?
Well, than the C it was replacing, which is admittedly
In article 2010062522560231540-angrybald...@gmailcom,
Owen Jacobson angrybald...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not hard. It's just begging for a visit from the fuckup fairy.
QOTD?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:02:55 +0200
Thomas Jollans tho...@jollans.com wrote:
On 06/25/2010 10:41 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
None is None is None
True
(None is None) is None
False
None is (None is None)
False
Chained comparisons - one of those language features that some of the
time
On 06/26/2010 05:39 AM, WANG Cong wrote:
On 06/26/10 00:11, Neil Hodgson nyamatongwe+thun...@gmail.com wrote:
WANG Cong:
4) Also, this will _somewhat_ violate the OOP princples, in OOP,
this is and should be implemented by inherence.
Most object oriented programming languages starting
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:10:06 +0200
Thomas Jollans tho...@jollans.com wrote:
Also, please refrain from top posting.
If you are going to berate people for bad netiquette you should learn
it too. Please trim your included text. You included the entire rest
of the OP's message including his
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:04:38 +0100
Nobody nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
probably broken a lot of web apps *without even trying*.
At least it isn't a problem with the first name field. Oh, wait...
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Oh wow. You went beyond :-)
Let me rewrite the example. I only want to calculate the wait time
which is basically the depart time minus the arrival time for multiple
days.
This is all on 1 station.
June 26, 2010:
Trian A, Arrived at 6:00AM, Depart at 9:00AM
Trian B, Arrived at 2:00AM, Depart at
Hello Xah,
With your background and the time you spend with emacs/computers, I
cannot explain to myself how you can read the news via a web interface
like google news (google groups was a little better years ago, but now
it is complete rubish). There are so many dedicated readers:
emacs-gnus,
thanks,firend. I have a try with SyncManager, Is there any problem in my
code?
from multiprocessing.managers import SyncManager,BaseProxy
import multiprocessing
import Queue
class ResourceController(object):
def __init__(self):
self.text = 'Hello world!'
Hi there.
Let me preface this by saying that I am a fan of Python. I use it
regularly and I like it a lot.
That is, I am using and liking Python 2.6.
I don't like Python 3.
I won't comment on the advanced stuff that is changed in Python 3, as I
haven't look into that.
My complaint is
Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
Python 3 scripts are incompatible with Python 2! (If they use print
variants, like writing to a file.)
Seems
On 06/25/2010 04:15 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
Idle is dead -- long live idlefork!
http://osdir.com/ml/python.idle/2002-09/msg00105.html
Actually idlefork is dead. It was merged back into Idle sometime around
Python 2.3. At least that's what its homepage claims.
--
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Reich
wertiges.prod...@googlemail.com wrote:
My complaint is about changing the syntax of print.
Okay.
To reiterate, I am strongly in disfavor of Python 3 and will stick to Python
2, for as least as long as Python 3 breaks my scripts.
This will be
Ixokai wrote:
In what possible way is:
setattr(foo, 'new_attr', 'blah')
getattr(foo, 'new_attr')
delattr(foo, 'new_attr')
Better then:
foo.new_attr = 'blah'
foo.new_attr
del foo.new_attr
I don't understand what your argument is or problem is with the regular
syntax,
On 06/26/2010 05:59 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
Hi there.
Let me preface this by saying that I am a fan of Python. I use it
regularly and I like it a lot.
That is, I am using and liking Python 2.6.
I don't like Python 3.
I won't comment on the advanced stuff that is changed in Python 3,
thanks for the info, christian!
Quoting Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de:
Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
Python 3 scripts are incompatible with
Python 3 is, by design, not 100% backwards compatible with Python 2.
Not that I'm completely happy with everything in Python 3 but, in it's
defense, discussion of Python 3 has been ongoing for years, almost as
long as the existence of Python 2. So the discussion of what went into
Python 3 is so
Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need to
test.
La de la la. Nothing to see here, move along.
--
... Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai (DOT) io
... Blog: http://meh.ixokai.io/
--
Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilliers at websiteburo.invalid writes:
Victoria Hernandez a écrit :
The new mision I herits the buggered code (i do not the bugger). How
do debugger him? Tahnk you very much. Vikhy :)
http://docs.python.org/library/pdb.html#module-pdb
I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
Example
===
ex.py::
def fib(n):
return n = 2 and 1 or fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
from benchmarker import Benchmarker
bm = Benchmarker(30) # or
On 6/26/10 9:01 AM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand why
some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won't happen anymore. What I mean is this:
I
On 06/27/10 02:33, Thomas Jollans wrote:
And here's the disadvantages:
-The Python 3 syntax actually requires more keystrokes.
Typically ONE extra character: the closing bracket. The opening bracket
can replace the whitespace previously required.
What really matters is not the number
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:59:41 -0430, Victor Subervi
victorsube...@gmail.com declaimed the following in
gmane.comp.python.general:
I could have sworn the concept had been brought up some 8 months
ago...
Stephen.
Stephen Hansen schrieb:
If your biggest complaint is the print statement/function -- man,
you're looking small, and are in for a world of hurt when you get to
the bytes/[string|unicode] split hits.
No, I'm not looking small. I'm thinking big. I sometimes use seemingly
small examples
Stephen Hansen me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io writes:
Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need
to test.
If you mean with post Usenet, there are several groups dedicated to
testing...
--
John Bokma j3b
On 6/26/10 11:11 AM, John Bokma wrote:
Stephen Hansenme+list/pyt...@ixokai.io writes:
Please ignore, sorry about wasted post. Having a posting issue, need
to test.
If you mean with post Usenet, there are several groups dedicated to
testing...
I know. I don't access this forum via usenet,
On 6/26/10 10:59 AM, Stefan Reich wrote:
There's no as long as -- its done. Python 2 is over with 2.7.
Well, then it is NOT done yet. And of course there is an as long as.
Yes, it is. 2.7 is in its release candidate phase right now. That means
there are no more features, new development on
Stephen Hansen me+list/pyt...@ixokai.io writes:
No, I'm not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
Python libraries then a few critical C
On 6/26/10 11:41 AM, John Bokma wrote:
Stephen Hansenme+list/pyt...@ixokai.io writes:
No, I'm not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
There were various serious problems with Python 2 which could not be fixed in
a backwards compatible way; we've been living with them for years and years
now, and it was decided that a single break to go back and correct
On 6/26/10 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
I have been using Python 3 for quite some time now, and this
[snip]
I'm not advocating using Python 3 or that it doesn't have plenty of work
to do still. I don't use it yet, so can't really comment on any of your
issues except to ask: Have you
No, I'm not trying to kill Python 2 at all. My current estimation is
that I'll be using it for at least the next three years -- library
conversion momentum is there, but its happening faster in the pure
Python libraries then a few critical C extensions I rely upon.
Based on my experience
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg p.c.j.klei...@rug.nl wrote:
Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
There were various serious problems with Python 2 which could not be fixed in
a backwards compatible way; we've been living with them for years
http://www.ae911truth.org/newsletter/2010/06/index.php#cdi
Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee
News - News Releases By AE911Truth
Written by Darcy Wearing and Richard Gage, AIA
Thursday, 24 June 2010 18:55
Having had the privilege of speaking with Tom Sullivan, an actual
Stephen Hansen schreef op de 26e dag van de zomermaand van het jaar 2010:
On 6/26/10 11:55 AM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
I have been using Python 3 for quite some time now, and this
[snip]
I'm not advocating using Python 3 or that it doesn't have plenty of work to do
still. I don't use it
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
What really matters is not the number of extra characters, but the
number of keystrokes. On a typical keyboard, producing a '(' requires 2
keystrokes (Shift + 9) and another 2 keystrokes for ')' (Shift + 0).
Also, spacebar is
On 6/26/10 3:56 AM, John Pinner wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:14 pm, Steven D'Apranost...@remove-this-
cybersource.com.au wrote:
Terry made the
very reasonable observation that you would serve the community, and thank
us, by posting a bug report to pylint, rather than just ignoring it, and
you respond
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 26.06.2010 17:59, schrieb Stefan Reich:
The main problem is that Python 3 is incompatible with almost all
scripts written for Python 2 (if they use print). And it gets worse:
Python 3 scripts are incompatible
On 27 June 2010 05:36, Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
This comment and many others in this thread fail to address the substance
of the OP's point. Languages such as Python and Perl have adopted the
strange practice of making new versions of the language backwards
On 6/26/2010 5:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I do not provide Python support in private email. Please try the python-list:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
or its USENET gateway:
news:comp.lang.python
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 16:23, Kermit Roseker...@polaris.net wrote:
Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 6/26/10 9:01 AM, Alexander Kapps wrote:
While I personally don't agree with this proposal (but I understand why
some people might want it), I can see a reason.
When disallowing direct attribute creation, those typos that seem to
catch newcommers won't happen anymore.
On 6/26/2010 1:09 PM, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
Example
===
ex.py::
def fib(n):
return n= 2 and 1 or fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)
from benchmarker import
On 6/25/2010 4:56 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:26 PM, rantingrick rantingr...@gmail.com
If *I* open an issue it will be ignored or quickly dismissed because
the people in charge of the Python community hate me.
Nonsense.
Though an inflammatory,
Since I was relatively new to python when python 3 was released (I'm
using it since python 2.5) I don't really care about the print
statement. Making print a function makes print less an exception since
all other functions need brackets.
I also like most of the other changes in python 3 like float
Terry,
Thank you for trying Benchmarker.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/26/2010 1:09 PM, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
I released Benchmarker 1.1.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Benchmarker/
Benchmarker is a small utility to benchmark your code.
Example
On 6/26/2010 2:55 PM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
PSF is funding work on the email module. Problems with cgi and other
internet interfacing modules are the main topic of discussion on py-dev
this week.
Some basic text string functions seem to be working on byte
string functions as well, but
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Kermit Rose ker...@polaris.net wrote:
On 6/26/2010 5:27 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
I do not provide Python support in private email. Please try the
python-list:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
or its USENET gateway:
I released Oktest 0.4.0.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Oktest/
http://packages.python.org/Oktest/
Overview
Oktest is a new-style testing library for Python.
::
from oktest import ok
ok (x) 0 # same as assert_(x 0)
ok (s) == 'foo'# same as
On 6/26/2010 11:59 AM, Stefan Reich wrote:
I don't like Python 3.
I love it.
My complaint is about changing the syntax of print.
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a bit
of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest source
of typos. But
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a
bit of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest
source of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of
syntax errors alleviates this. Logic bugs are a much
On 6/26/2010 8:02 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedytjre...@udel.edu writes:
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a
bit of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest
source of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of
syntax errors
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
To make your life easier, and even save keystrokes:..
def tp(*args): print(args) # tuple print
Too much to remember, makes my life harder. If I were that organized,
I'd figure out how to use the logging module. ;)
--
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:32 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
Having completely switched from 'printf(' to 'print ', I have had a bit
of a problem switching back to 'print('. It is my single largest source
of typos. But a decent system that puts me at the site of
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:10:39 -0700, Stephen Hansen wrote:
This characterization of adding attributes to an object as something
else, some special kind of activity called metaprogramming I think I
reject outright, whereas I believe -- though I do not claim to speak for
him/her -- the OP's
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:38:30 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote:
On 06/27/10 02:33, Thomas Jollans wrote:
And here's the disadvantages:
-The Python 3 syntax actually requires more keystrokes.
Typically ONE extra character: the closing bracket. The opening bracket
can replace the whitespace
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:41:30 -0500, John Bokma wrote:
Done means finished: complete, not going to be advanced any further.
I think that's not true. If enough people want to support Python 2 it
might be possible to advance Python 2.
I can't see that happening. In my experience those who are
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
snip
CPython is a fairly plodding implementation. But that's due to the
conservativeness of CPython: Unladen Swallow is faster, and PyPI is
faster still, and the PyPI people expect to eventually be
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:33:02 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
* str is now unicode = unicode is no longer a pain in the a
True. Now byte strings are a pain in the arse.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 6/26/10 6:24 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:38:30 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote:
All in all, the new syntax requires 4 keystrokes, none of which are home
keys; compared with old syntax which requires 1 keystroke in thumb's
home position.
Producing print function takes a little
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 00:59:35 +0200, Laurent Verweijen wrote:
Something I really dislike, is that the __cmp__-method is gone. I
really hate to write 6 different functions, whereas I'm used to writing
a oneliners which covers each of the 6 cases. I haven't switched to
pyton 3 yet, but when I
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:08:48 +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
I think that's not true. If enough people want to support Python 2 it
might be possible to advance Python 2.
That won't be sufficient: enough people wanting support won't have any
effect. People also need to want it enough to
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:35:25 -0700, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote: snip
CPython is a fairly plodding implementation. But that's due to the
conservativeness of CPython: Unladen Swallow is faster, and PyPI is
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:06:12 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:02:32 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
[...]
To all the Python 3.x haters
Hmmm, I just realised that it might seem that this was aimed at Paul
directly. I'm sorry, I wasn't intending to imply that he's a Python 3
In message mailman.2123.1277522976.32709.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this
In message mailman.2126.1277534032.32709.python-l...@python.org, Ian Kelly
wrote:
Your example from the first post of the thread rewritten using sqlalchemy:
conn.execute(
items.update()
.where(items.c.inventory_nr == modify_id)
.values(
dict(
In message 2010062522560231540-angrybald...@gmailcom, Owen Jacobson wrote:
It's not hard. It's just begging for a visit from the fuckup fairy.
That’s the same fallacious argument I pointed out earlier.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message pan.2010.06.26.10.49.02.156...@nowhere.com, Nobody wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:40:41 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I construct ad-hoc queries all the time. It really isn’t that hard to
do safely.
Wrong.
Even if you get the quoting absolutely correct (which is a very
On Jun 24, 2:17 am, Christian Stapfer nob...@nowhere.nil wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org schrieb im
Newsbeitragnews:87eifw50cd@lola.goethe.zz...
small Pox smallpox...@gmail.com writes:
Leslie Lamport is a Jew - His book is NOTORIOUSLY
uninsightfulobfuscatory (nothing on the
In article mailman.2172.1277594845.32709.python-l...@python.org,
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/26/2010 2:55 PM, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
Some basic text string functions seem to be working on byte
string functions as well, but sometimes they don't, and there's
no rhyme in why it does
In article i06cju$qq...@lust.ihug.co.nz,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message mailman.2123.1277522976.32709.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message mailman.2123.1277522976.32709.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I
On 06/26/2010 09:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In messagemailman.2123.1277522976.32709.python-l...@python.org, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 06/25/2010 07:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a
USA will be DESTROYED the same way GERMANY was DESTROYED - What The
Zionist Jews Did To Germany
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw2FhXZ9tiw
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 26, 8:28 pm, nanothermite911fbibustards
nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com wrote:
USA will be DESTROYED the same way GERMANY was DESTROYED - What The
Zionist Jews Did To Germany
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw2FhXZ9tiw
How the Jews did 9 11
4000 Jews KNEW in ADVANCE of 911, They
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for
all to see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away.
I'm assuming this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I
expect an apology.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for
all to see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away.
I'm assuming
On Jun 25, 8:24 pm, WANG Cong xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
Understand, but please consider my proposal again, if we switched to:
setattr(foo, 'new_attr', blah)
by default, isn't Python still dynamic as it is? (Please teach me if I
am wrong here.)
This why I said the questionable thing
In message pan.2010.06.26.11.04.22.328...@nowhere.com, Nobody wrote:
Ask anyone with a surname like O'Neil, O'Connor, O'Leary, etc; they've
probably broken a lot of web apps *without even trying*.
Last I checked, I couldn’t post comments on freedom-to-tinker.com.
--
In message roy-854954.20435125062...@news.panix.com, Roy Smith wrote:
I recently fixed a bug in some production code. The programmer was
careful to use snprintf() to avoid buffer overflows. The only problem
is, he wrote something along the lines of:
snprintf(buf, strlen(foo), foo);
A
In message mailman.2077.1277482235.32709.python-l...@python.org, Ian Kelly
wrote:
I use cron.
Con: Most cron implementations have a maximum frequency of once per
minute.
Another con is: what happens if a run takes longer than the invocation
frequency?
--
Dutch may use 'decoy Jews' to fight racism
By TOBY STERLING (AP) – 1 day ago
AMSTERDAM — A hidden-camera video showing Jews being harassed on the
street in a Moroccan neighborhood of Amsterdam has led Dutch
authorities to consider combating hate crimes with decoy Jews —
undercover police officers
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:32:23 -0700 (PDT), small Pox
smallpox...@gmail.com wrote:
By
You're an idiot. Take your SPAM elsewhere.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
How Non-Torah Zionist Rabbi Sholom Rubashkin, a former vice president
of Agriprocessors Inc became so rich and EARNED 27 years in JAIL ?
Most Jew Lawyers are LIARS !!!
Former slaughterhouse exec gets 27 years for fraud
By MICHAEL J. CRUMB (AP) – 4 days ago
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa — A former Iowa
Everyone,
I'm pleased to annouce the release both a production and
experimental release of GMPY. GMPY is a wrapper for the
MPIR or GMP multiple-precision arithmetic library. GMPY
is available for download from:
http://code.google.com/p/gmpy/
Production release
--
GMPY 1.12 is
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
