Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I've committed your fix in r84975. Thank you.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Stephan Bellegy stephan.bell...@gmail.com added the comment:
it is reproductible.
At first, Python 2.6.? was installed.
i tried to install 2.7 and got the problem
uninstalled 2.7
tried 2.6.6 and got the problem
then google, delete dir and got it running
--
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
The tests pass here, but I haven't thoroughly reviewed the patch yet. After a
quick glance it generally looks ok, although I wish we didn't have so much
duplication.
--
___
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Thank you very much! I have kept the second approach (use PaddedFile at all
times), since it is more regular and minimizes the probability for borderline
cases.
As for the supposed performance slowdown, it doesn't seem significant. On large
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Yes, unescaped utf-8 is explicitly allowed in headers by RFC 3977:
The content of a header SHOULD be in UTF-8. However, if an
implementation receives an article from elsewhere that uses octets in
the range 128 to 255 in some other
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Anatoly, last we heard you did not wish to sign the contributor agreement and
so were not submitting patches. We are respecting your wishes by not applying
this. Have you changed your mind?
--
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
I haven't investigated but this is weird (especially the fact that it doesn't
*always* happen). There might be a problem with SETUP_WITH or perhaps the
method cache:
import bz2
f = bz2.BZ2File('foo.bz2', 'wb')
with f: pass
...
Traceback
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Actually, it is because bz2 doesn't call PyType_Ready() but instead sets some
field manually. Perhaps we could have a guard somewhere that raises a fatal
error when a C extension type hasn't been properly readied?
In the meantime, this patch
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2010/9/23 Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Actually, it is because bz2 doesn't call PyType_Ready() but instead sets some
field manually. Perhaps we could have a guard somewhere
New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
Following script hangs on Python3.x.
from subprocess import *
import sys
p = Popen([sys.executable, -c, import sys; print(sys.stdin.read(1))],
stdin=PIPE)
p.stdin.write(b'x')
p.wait()
This is because unbuffered functionality
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Interestingly, following code also hangs. Maybe I'm
misunderstanding the meaning of *bufsize*
from subprocess import *
import sys
p = Popen([sys.executable, -c, import sys; print(sys.stdin.read(1))],
stdin=PIPE)
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
I still haven't received answers on the licensing questions in developer's
mailing list. After the amount of negative feedback received I decided not to
continue. But I am still interested in constructive discussion to get
satisfying
New submission from Mark Shannon ma...@dcs.gla.ac.uk:
Attached program fails.
See comments in file for details and possible diagnosis
--
files: binary_op_mimic.py
messages: 117216
nosy: Mark.Shannon
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Incorrect semantics of __radd__
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
ISTM that the attached patch is trivial enough not to require any contributor
agreement or copyright assignment, at least if we change Ma Test CGI Server
v1.0 to something neutral.
--
___
Python
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Could you post some simple examples and an explanation of what you think the
problem is? I have no clue what problem your code is trying to show just by
looking at it. (Maybe it will be clear to someone else, but still, simple
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
This is indeed weird. PyNumber_Add ends up calling compare_add with the float
as its first argument, which is impossible to do from Python. And the
wrap_binaryfunc_r check for subtypes means that compare.__radd__ claims it
doesn't support
Brian Brazil brian.bra...@gmail.com added the comment:
The behaviour is a bit more nuanced:
os.path.join('x', '')
'x/'
os.path.join('x', '', 'y')
'x/y'
os.path.join('x', '', 'y', '', '')
'x/y/'
os.path.join('', 'x')
'x'
I'm unsure how to word this best, maybe non-trailing empty paths are
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
If I understand correctly, the complaint is that (for example) in Python 3.x,
we have:
Python 3.1.2 (r312:79147, Aug 20 2010, 20:06:00)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9930
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
PyNumber_Add ends up calling compare_add with the float as its first
argument, which is impossible to do from Python.
[Assuming you mean complex_add.] I think this bit is expected, though.
complex_add (or float_add, or whatever) provides
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Hmm, not sure. I'm referring to Objects/abstract.c, binary_op1, which tries to
call both slotv and slotw.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9930
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
--
keywords: +needs review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9815
___
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
It looks like Mark is right: the wrap_binaryfunc_r subtype check should just
be removed. The corresponding check in 2.x only occurs for types which don't
have the Py_TPFLAGS_CHECKTYPES flag set. As of 2.7, *all* of the numeric types
have
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
That's encouraging. I would suggest making this fix; the fact that Jython and
IronPython also get this right is another reason.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Committed in r84983. Thanks!
--
components: +Extension Modules -Library (Lib)
resolution: accepted - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Patch committed in r84980 (3.2), r84981 (3.1) and r84982 (2.7).
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9928
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Adding Michael for review of py3k_fix__AssertRaisesContext.patch.
--
nosy: +michael.foord
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9815
New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
test_ttk_guionly hangs on x86 XP5 buldbot.
But it doesn't hang on test_tk. Former shows
widget but latter doesn't on my machine.
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/x86%20XP-5%203.x/builds/1348/steps/test/logs/stdio
New submission from Adam Nemecek adamneme...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure if this is the intended behavior, but it seems unusual to me.
a = [set([]) for i in range(2)] evaluates to a list [set([]),set([])] and
b= 2*[set([])] evaluates to [set([]),set([])].
Nothing wrong here.
Nevertheless, if I do
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Committed to py3k in r84988 using Nick's second suggestion.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9790
Changes by Jon Anglin jang...@fortresgrand.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9808
___
___
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9790
___
___
Python-bugs-list
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
No, but you could bring it up on python-ideas. (It would have to wait until
after the moratorium in any case.)
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9905
___
___
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es:
--
nosy: +jcea
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1385
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I believe that charset is the standard default for html, which would make this
a feature request.
--
assignee: tim_one -
nosy: +r.david.murray
stage: unit test needed - needs patch
type: behavior - feature request
versions:
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment:
This is well defined in Python and will not change.
--
nosy: +eric.smith
resolution: - rejected
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
type: - feature request
___
Python tracker
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Here's a patch of the functionality. The doc change is small and easy, I'll add
it shortly.
One oddity is that os.path.samefile is False for a link and its source, but
True for a symlink and its source. I find that to be quite odd, but stepping
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
It appears as though this was fixed as part of issue 1983. Antoine, can you
confirm that?
--
nosy: +pitrou, r.david.murray -BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
With following implementation, issamefile return True
for hard link. I heard GetFinalPathNameByHandle
returns different paths for hard links.
import nt, os
def issamefile(path1, path2):
... fd1 = os.open(path1, os.O_RDONLY)
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Here is a fixed version of Victor's bench (didn't work on 2.x).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18983/bench_pickle.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com added the comment:
giampaolo: did you ever rewrite the patch?
For reference to other users:
http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/source/browse/trunk/pyftpdlib/ftpserver.py
Note the complexity of the two handle_accept implementations in that file; both
of them
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
And here is new performance patch (Victor's patch was outdated because of heavy
changes incorporated from Unladen Swallow). Results of bench_pickle.py are as
follows:
* Python 2.7 (cPickle):
Protocol 0
- dump: 189.8 ms
- load (seekable=False):
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
issue6610 looks very similar. issue9074 may also be related.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9905
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The pid_t issue was fixed but not uid_t/gid_t.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2005
___
New submission from Kamil Kisiel kisi...@users.sourceforge.net:
The library documentation (http://docs.python.org/library/os.html) states:
os.EX_NOTFOUND
Exit code that means something like “an entry was not found”.
Availability: Unix.
New in version 2.3.
However, on both my Linux and OS X
Kamil Kisiel kisi...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
That should have read Linux and OS X installs of *Python*.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9933
___
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Nick noticed another issue with this, and it actually won't work on pre-Vista
versions since we load GetFinalPathNameByHandle at runtime, which is why we had
that NotImplementedError.
Attaching a patch which should handle this. We only try the
New submission from Retro vinet...@gmail.com:
http://docs.python.org/distutils/sourcedist.html#manifest-related-options
Please visit the above link and note the typo in:
-o is a sortcut for --manifest-only.
Should be:
-o is a shortcut for --manifest-only.
The word sortcut is a typo. Please
Changes by Dan Buch daniel.b...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +meatballhat
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4661
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
The following code exists in Modules/posixmodule.c
8167 /* These come from sysexits.h */
...
8216 #ifdef EX_NOTFOUND
8217 if (ins(d, EX_NOTFOUND, (long)EX_NOTFOUND)) return -1;
8218 #endif /* EX_NOTFOUND */
sysexits.h on my Mac has no
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Perhaps this constant existed at some point on some linux systems...google
found one comment about it referencing posix.2. I also found it mentioned in a
specific version of sendmail, and in bash. When it appears it seems to most
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
s/linux/unix/
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9933
___
___
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
+1 for removing it from the docs.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9933
___
___
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
This is a bunch of assorted optimizations which make pickling of user-defined
classes quite a bit faster.
Example on a minimal instance:
$ python -m timeit -s import pickle; import collections, __main__;
__main__.X=type('X', (), {}); x=X()
MunSic JEONG rus...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thank you for a kind guidance.
I uploaded patch with
- function name checktm
- add comment above gettmarg
- move comment in checktm to (above function signature)
- change comment little bit to mention issue6608
- { on new line
Jon Anglin jang...@fortresgrand.com added the comment:
issue9783.diff provides a patch that will compile clean on 32 and 64 bit
Windows systems. I tried to avoid explicit casts where I could, but it was not
always possible. I have ported a lot of my company's code to 64 bit (all
Windows
Changes by Skye sky...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +skyepn
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2209
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Jon Anglin jang...@fortresgrand.com added the comment:
issue9784.diff contains a patch that compiles clean on 32 and 64 bit Windows.
This patch is exactly what Amaury Forgeot d'Arc recommended in msg115750.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18989/issue9784.diff
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
nosy: -brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6608
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
With the attached traceme.py,
$ python -m trace -m -s -c traceme.py
lines cov% module (path)
250% traceme (traceme.py)
$ cat traceme.cover
x = (1,
2,
1: 3)
This is wrong
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
I am attaching a patch that fixes this issue. Need to add a unit test.
--
assignee: - belopolsky
components: +Library (Lib)
keywords: +patch
stage: - unit test needed
type: - behavior
versions: +Python 3.2
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +eli.bendersky, terry.reedy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9936
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
it does seem that the consensus is that this is not a generally desirable
feature.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray -BreamoreBoy
resolution: - rejected
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
status: closed - languishing
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1763
___
___
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9936
___
Kamil Kisiel kisi...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
I mostly wanted to just report the issue rather than propose a solution, so I'm
in favor of whatever everyone feels is best.
As for how I came across the issue, it was mostly curiosity, I wanted to see
the numerical value of all
Changes by Andrew Ziem ahz...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +AndrewZiem
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7519
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by MunSic JEONG rus...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue459007
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I fail to see the issue. The documentation clearly says, above the block of all
the EX_* constants:
Note
Some of these may not be available on all Unix platforms, since there is some
variation. These constants are defined where they are
101 - 170 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
