On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the immediate
availability of Python 2.7.2 release candidate 1.
2.7.2 is the second in bugfix release for the Python 2.7 series. 2.7 is the last
major verison of the 2.x line and will be receiving bug fixes while new feature
Announcing PyYAML-3.10
A new bug fix release of PyYAML is now available:
http://pyyaml.org/wiki/PyYAML
Changes
===
* Do not try to build LibYAML bindings on platforms other than CPython
(Thank to olt(at)bogosoft(dot)com).
* Clear
Hello!
I'm pleased to announce version 1.0.1, a bugfix release of branch 1.0
of SQLObject.
What is SQLObject
=
SQLObject is an object-relational mapper. Your database tables are described
as classes, and rows are instances of those classes. SQLObject is meant to be
easy to
On Mon, 30 May 2011 04:29:19 +, Chris Torek wrote:
In article 4de31635$0$29990$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com, Steven
D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
That's also completely wrong. The correct way to test for a NAN is with
the IEEE-mandated function isnan(). The NAN
On Mon, 30 May 2011 04:15:11 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:14:58 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
So, apart from float(nan), are there actually any places where real
production code has to handle NaN? I was unable to get a nan by any of
the above methods, except for
Le 29/05/2011 23:42, Ben Finney a écrit :
Peter Pearsonppearson@nowhere.invalid writes:
Python works in terms of objects having names, and one
object can have many names.
Or no names. So it's less accurate (though better than talking of
“variables”) to speak of Python objects “having
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Laurent Claessens moky.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 29/05/2011 23:42, Ben Finney a écrit :
Peter Pearsonppearson@nowhere.invalid writes:
Python works in terms of objects having names, and one
object can have many names.
Or no names. So it's less accurate
Could you give an example of an object that has no name ? I've missed
something ...
def foo():
return 5
print(foo())
The int object 5 has no name here.
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
^
SyntaxError:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Laurent Claessens moky.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give an example of an object that has no name ? I've missed
something ...
object()
object object at 0xb73d04d8
--
With best regards,
Daniel Kluev
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
Modules, classes, and functions have a .__name__ attribute (I call it
their 'definition name') used to print a representation. As best I can
Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com writes:
On May 29, 3:44 pm, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy as a swallow to announce
a
release candidate for the fourth bugfix release for the Python 3.1
series, Python
3.1.4.
The Pi release
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space between 5 and
.__add__ ?
Why does it
Well, the subject says it almost all: I'd like to write a small Vector
class for arbitrary-dimensional vectors.
I am wondering what would be the most efficient and/or most elegant
way to compute the length of such a Vector?
Right now, I've got
def length(self):
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:08:23 +0200, Laurent Claessens wrote:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:12:50 +0200, Laurent Claessens wrote:
Could you give an example of an object that has no name ? I've missed
something ...
mylist = [None, 42, something]
The list object has a name, mylist.
The three objects inside the list have no names.
--
Steven
--
Laurent Claessens moky.m...@gmail.com writes:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space between 5 and
.__add__ ?
Why does it work ?
Try asking it the other way around. Why doesn't ‘5.__add__(6)’, without
the space,
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
foo(x=1, y=2, z=3)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#8, line 1, in module
foo(x=1, y=2, z=3)
File pyshell#4, line 2, in foo
bar(y=2, **kwargs)
TypeError: bar() got multiple values for keyword argument 'y'
And the above
Thanks for all your feedback.
Well, I'll play a little and go either for a wrapper around
ways to detecth a file change or for a tiny socket solution.
Thanks again.
On 05/30/2011 04:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Chris Torek nos...@torek.net wrote:
What would
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Gabriel snoopy.6...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, the subject says it almost all: I'd like to write a small Vector
class for arbitrary-dimensional vectors.
I am wondering what would be the most efficient and/or most elegant
way to compute the length of such a
Laurent Claessens wrote:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space between 5
Gabriel wrote:
Well, the subject says it almost all: I'd like to write a small Vector
class for arbitrary-dimensional vectors.
I am wondering what would be the most efficient and/or most elegant
way to compute the length of such a Vector?
Right now, I've got
def length(self):
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space between 5 and
.__add__ ?
Why does it work ?
It's a hint for the tokenizer.
I didn't know the tokenizer. Now I understand.
Thanks
Laurent
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space between 5 and
.__add__ ?
Why does it work ?
It's a hint for the tokenizer.
I didn't know the tokenizer. Now I understand.
Thanks
Laurent
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello
Is it a waste of time to try to get school admins to put python in
their school laptops?
OK. Here's the crib for the rest[!] of the world. Here in Australia
most secondary schools [that is kids from age approx 12-18] have some sort
of netbook/laptop program. I have looked at
Laurent Claessens writes:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a space
I'm sorry, I wanted to send the message below to the list and instead I sent it
to just one user.
Piotr
Dnia 23-05-2011 o 10:29:24 Piotr Kamiński piotr.kamin...@poczta.onet.eu
napisał(a):
Dnia 23-05-2011 o 00:58:55 Brendan Simon (eTRIX) brendan.si...@etrix.com.au
napisał(a):
...
Take a
On 30/05/11 15:45, John Thornton wrote:
Hello
Is it a waste of time to try to get school admins to put
python in their school laptops?
OK. Here's the crib for the rest[!] of the world. Here in
Australia most secondary schools [that is kids from age approx 12-18]
have some
I agree fully. Linux is better and safer. But they seem hellbent on getting
their students to use Windows. For laughs the kids in year 7 start off with
this on their school netbook:
Individual software packages
MS Office Professional 2010 $80.30
(Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, Outlook,
Hello!
I'm pleased to announce version 1.0.1, a bugfix release of branch 1.0
of SQLObject.
What is SQLObject
=
SQLObject is an object-relational mapper. Your database tables are described
as classes, and rows are instances of those classes. SQLObject is meant to be
easy to
rantingrick wrote:
On May 18, 7:19 am, Peter Moylan inva...@peter.pmoylan.org.invalid
wrote:
It's interesting to note that the definitions of 'recursive' to be found
in Wikipedia and Wiktionary have very little in common with the
definitions to be found in the dictionaries covered by
I want to make a function that is called only once per one argument. I mean I
want to store data of function calling to prevent calling it again if there is
no need.
How to make it? For example I can make a global list that just consist of
tuples
[(arg1, res1), (arg2, res2), ...]. Ok, how to
rantingrick wrote:
On May 18, 12:59 pm, s...@sig.for.address (Victor Eijkhout) wrote:
Harrison Hill harrish...@gmx.com wrote:
No need - I have the Dictionary definition of recursion here:
Recursion: (N). See recursion.
If you tell a joke, you have to tell it right.
Jeez, speaking of bad
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, vino19 wrote:
I want to make a function that is called only once per one argument. I mean I
want to store data of function calling to prevent calling it again if there is
no need.
How to make it? For example I can make a global list that just consist of tuples
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:15 PM, John Thornton secretel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Is it a waste of time to try to get school admins to put python in
their school laptops?
Two halves to this question.
1) Would it be of value if the school admins were to put Python on the
school
Thanks a lot to both of you, Chris Peter!
(I knew the solution would be simple ... ;-) )
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:58 PM, vino19 vinogra...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to make a function that is called only once per one argument. I mean I
want to store data of function calling to prevent calling it again if there
is no need.
How to make it? For example I can make a global list that
Thanks.
It seems that dictionary is a sorted list of tuples, so the procedure of
searching an element is quite quick.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 30 mai, 13:09, hackingKK hackin...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Even better, try convincing them to use Ubuntu instead of a virus
called Where I Never Do Operations With Safety, or WINDOWS for short.
That way Python will come by default and VB will be out of question
Happy hacking.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:50 PM, vino19 vinogra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
It seems that dictionary is a sorted list of tuples, so the procedure of
searching an element is quite quick.
Not sorted - it's hashed, so it's even faster. Yep, sounds like a
dictionary is everything you want!
Chris Torek wrote:
In at least some versions of Python 2
I'm with P3k :P. However thank you for your guidelines.
Last my attempt was to use a *for* p.wait() , as mentioned earlier
That looks good enough. I noted some little delay for the first lines,
mostly sure Popen assign some buffer even
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're always going to look them up by the argument, the best way
would be to use a dictionary:
cache={arg1: res1, arg2: res2, ...}
Then you can search with a simple: cache[arg135]
You can add things with:
On 5/30/2011 5:08 AM, Laurent Claessens wrote:
Le 30/05/2011 11:02, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 5/30/2011 3:38 AM, Laurent wrote:
Cool. I was thinking that 5 was the name, but
5.__add__(6)
File stdin, line 1
5.__add__(6)
Try 5 .__add__(6)
What is the rationale behind the fact to add a
Before I reinvent the wheel, I'm wondering if anyone can
recommend a 3rd party tree data structure module? (I do not need
a GUI component)
I've looked at ElementTree but I think(?) need something more
flexible.
I have a parser that reads a proprietary file format which
defines an outline-like
Thanks for the details on IronPython's implementation B-)
Hopefully Pypy will eventually get rid of its own Gil, since it doesn't
do refcounting either.
Regards,
Pascal
Le 28/05/2011 00:52, Dino Viehland a écrit :
In IronPython we have fine grained locking on our mutable data
structures.
On May 29, 10:41 pm, ray r...@aarden.us wrote:
I have Python 2.7 on Win7 Pro on a tightly locked down desktop. I
would like to install Networkx from an egg. From what I have read,
Setuptools can be used for this.
I don't know how to install Setuptools. The exe will not work. On
En Mon, 30 May 2011 06:46:01 -0300, Peter Otten __pete...@web.de
escribió:
Gabriel wrote:
Well, the subject says it almost all: I'd like to write a small Vector
class for arbitrary-dimensional vectors.
class Vector(object):
... def __init__(self, *coords):
...
In article 4de3358b$0$29990$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com
Steven D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Better than a float method is a function which takes any number as
argument:
import math, fractions, decimal
math.isnan(fractions.Fraction(2, 3))
False
On 2011-05-28, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's geographic. This list covers a lot of geography; I'm in
Australia, there are quite a few Brits, and probably the bulk of posts
come from either the US or Europe. (And yes, I did deliberately fold
all of Europe down to one
On 2011-05-28, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Angelico
yes, bit of a Bible geek as well as a programming geek
So you don't believe in genetic algorithms, then ?
(ducking for cover)
--
When in doubt, use brute force.
-- Ken Thompson
--
Chris Torek wrote:
In at least some versions of Python 2
[the file-type object iterators behave badly with pipes]
(This may still be true in Python 3, I just have no experience with
Py3k. At least some version of Python 2 means the ones I have
access to, and have tried. :-) )
In article
Hi,
I am trying to build an application using sqlalchemy.
in principle i have the structure
#==
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.orm import *
metadata = MetaData('sqlite://')
a_table = Table('tf_lehrer', metadata,
Column('id', Integer,
On 30-5-2011 16:30, jmfauth wrote:
On 30 mai, 13:09, hackingKK hackin...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Even better, try convincing them to use Ubuntu instead of a virus
called Where I Never Do Operations With Safety, or WINDOWS for short.
That way Python will come by default and VB will be
Hi All,
Pydev 2.1.0 has been released
Details on Pydev: http://pydev.org
Details on its development: http://pydev.blogspot.com
Release Highlights:
---
Code Analysis
By default, only the currently opened editor will be analyzed
(resulting in much shorter build
On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:04:41 +0200, Rikishi42 wrote:
On 2011-05-28, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's geographic. This list covers a lot of geography; I'm in
Australia, there are quite a few Brits, and probably the bulk of posts
come from either the US or Europe. (And yes, I
On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:58:35 +, Chris Torek wrote:
In article 4de3358b$0$29990$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com Steven
D'Aprano steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Better than a float method is a function which takes any number as
argument:
import math, fractions, decimal
On 2011-05-29, at 4:30 , Henry Olders wrote:
I just spent a considerable amount of time and effort debugging a program.
The made-up code snippet below illustrates the problem I encountered:
def main():
a = ['a list','with','three elements']
print a
print fnc1(a)
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
LOL
I invite you to consider the difference between a legally dead person
moments before being resuscitated by a paramedic,
( ... alive )
versus a chicken that
has just been beheaded and is still running around the yard,
( ... alive )
versus a
Ian Kelly wrote:
You have just misrepresented Steven's argument, which is rather ironic
considering that you're the one who brought up straw-men. Steven did
not use one code snippet to demonstrate that Python 2 and Python 3 are
fully compatible. The code snippet merely demonstrated that Python
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
At least,
his arguments make more sense if I read him as arguing from the not
completely compatible position. It's possible he is intentionally
equivocating for dramatic effect.
yes
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Henry Olders henry.old...@mcgill.ca wrote:
On 2011-05-29, at 4:30 , Henry Olders wrote:
I just spent a considerable amount of time and effort debugging a program.
The made-up code snippet below illustrates the problem I encountered:
def main():
a =
Chris Angelico wrote:
Is it a waste of time to try to get school admins to put python in
their school laptops?
No, absolutely no... Python advocacy is necessary in this venue !
Possibly the best way to encourage Python deployment would be to
require it to run some internal
On Tue, 31 May 2011 01:32:01 +0100, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net
wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Compatibility is inherently continuous, a matter
of degree.
Compatible by degrees is incompatible. Just 'how' incompatible
determines whether the factor(s) are utterly useless, or
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Henry Olders henry.old...@mcgill.ca wrote:
What I would like is that the variables which are included in the function
definition's parameter list, would be always treated as local to that function
You still mis-reading docs and explanations you received from
On 5/30/2011 6:15 PM, Irmen de Jong wrote:
Do you mean one of these os's, where Python (2) is not
working properly because the *defaultencoding* is set
to utf-8?
Huh? On all of my machines, including windows and Ubuntu 11.04,
sys.getdefaultencoding()
returns 'ascii'.
For me, WINXP, 2.7
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:43 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
I realize you are now asserting that compatibility is a boolean
condition, and that totally incompatible is a redundant phrase that
you tossed out as a joke. I don't know whether you're sincere or
backpedaling, but in
On 5/30/2011 8:28 PM, Henry Olders wrote:
Sadly, I feel that the main issue that I was trying to address, has
not been dealt with.
False. Please go back and read what I and others wrote before.
...
What I would like is that the variables which are included in the
function definition's
On 5/30/2011 8:32 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Ever tried to read Beowulf in the original? Ever tried to write Ænglisc ?
I have, and it is a lot further from modern American than Python 2 and 3
are from each other.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5/30/2011 8:32 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
However, I guarantee that if I'm dumped unaided in Piccadilly I'll be
able to hail a cab, pay my £12.00 and get myself to Liverpool Street
Station, find the bathroom, and be on the correct train just in time for
dinner, all without looking into the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Again, go back and reread what I and other wrote. I believe that you are, in
part, hypnotized by the work 'variable'. Can you define the word? There are
10 to 20 possible variations, and yours is probably wrong for Python.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:43 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
If you disagree, then I invite you to list one example of two
different things that are compatible.
one man, and one woman
Now you're
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:57 AM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Possibly the best way to encourage Python deployment would be to
require it to run some internal script.
Chris has a great idea here... but I think more along the lines of an app
that
Chris Angelico wrote:
Hmm. If you did write those two scripting languages, we would finally
be able to type man woman to get docs on how to talk to women...
Which just wouldn't be fair, because her use of man man would lead
her no closer to understanding how men speak... (er, think,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Henry Olders henry.old...@mcgill.ca wrote:
I don't believe I'm the only person who thinks this way. Here is a quote from
wikipedia: It is considered good programming practice to make the scope of
variables as narrow as feasible so that different parts of a
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Infinitely-nested scoping is simply one of the casualties of a
non-declarative language.
Well, this is not accurate, as you can have 'infinitely-nested
scoping' in python, in form of nested functions. For example, you can
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Kluev dan.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Infinitely-nested scoping is simply one of the casualties of a
non-declarative language.
Well, this is not accurate, as you can have
Hi all,
Could any one provide relevant url/s on the usage of *pyant* scripts and its
setup as well
Thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Henry Olders henry.old...@mcgill.cawrote:
What I would like is that the variables which are included in the function
definition's parameter list, would be always treated as local to that
function (and of course, accessible to nested functions) but NOT global
On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:28:34 -0400, Henry Olders wrote:
I am trying to write python programs in a more-or-less functional
programming mode, ie functions without side effects (except for print
statements, which are very helpful for debugging). This is easiest when
all variables declared in
On Dienstag 31 Mai 2011, Henry Olders wrote:
What I would like is that the variables which are included in
the function definition's parameter list, would be always
treated as local to that function (and of course, accessible
to nested functions) but NOT global unless explicitly defined
as
Am 31.05.2011 02:28 schrieb Henry Olders:
This suggests that the decision to make unassigned (ie free
variables) have a global scope, was made somewhat arbitrarily to
prevent clutter. But I don't believe that the feared clutter would
materialize. My understanding is that when a variable is
Daniel Kluev dan.kl...@gmail.com writes:
On a sidenote, I wonder what is the reason to keep word 'variable' in
python documentation at all. I believe word 'name' represents concept
better, and those, who come from other languages, would be less likely
to associate wrong definitions with it.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:34:09 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
On 5/30/2011 8:32 PM, harrismh777 wrote:
Ever tried to read Beowulf in the original? Ever
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Wolfgang Rohdewald
wolfg...@rohdewald.de wrote:
what you really seem to want is that a function by default
cannot have any side effects (you have a side effect if a
function changes things outside of its local scope). But
that would be a very different language
Dennis Lee Bieber wlfr...@ix.netcom.com writes:
Well... He did say find the bathroom, not ask for directions to
whatever euphemism is in current usage (water closet, W/C, loo ?)
The room which contains the bath is the bathroom.
Assuming that the toilet is in the same room as the bath is
sorin sorin.sbar...@gmail.com added the comment:
FYI, I got the above output from 10.7 from a friend, I do not have access to
the seed, so the information could be wrong.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11623
Petri Lehtinen pe...@digip.org added the comment:
The name of the level parameter to LogRecord constructor is correct in the
documentation (I checked the code). The only inconsitency that I see is that
the corresponding attribute name of LogRecord is levelno.
--
nosy: +petri.lehtinen
Martin Ponweiser m.ponwei...@gmail.com added the comment:
You are right, I should have looked closer -- sorry to all involved.
Nevertheless this caused some confusion here. I guess mentioning the
inconsistency in the documentation is out of the question.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Petri
Petri Lehtinen pe...@digip.org added the comment:
Martin Ponweiser wrote:
I guess mentioning the inconsistency in the documentation is out of
the question.
No, not at all. If you have a good wording in your mind, please share
it :) Or even better, write a patch.
--
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
resolution: fixed -
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1195
___
Petri Lehtinen pe...@digip.org added the comment:
On 2.7, your example raises an error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File a.py, line 7, in module
z.write(a, a)
File /home/petri/tmp/cpython/cpython/Lib/zipfile.py, line 1071, in write
self.fp.write(zinfo.FileHeader())
File
Changes by Petri Lehtinen pe...@digip.org:
--
nosy: +petri.lehtinen
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12014
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
The last change appears to have fixed the problem; AFAIK there have been no
test_logging failures on the buildbots for several days.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
There appear to have been no test_logging failures on the buildbots for around
a week, so closing this issue. A change to ignore socket errors when the server
was closed appears to have done the trick.
--
resolution: - fixed
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
The last change appears to have fixed the problem;
AFAIK there have been no test_logging failures on the buildbots
for several days.
Great job, thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment:
to be backported in packaging -- in a way that will make it work with previous
python versions for the incoming 2.x backport
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jonas H. jo...@lophus.org added the comment:
I'm not.
My patch doesn't address the problem of unlinkable methods but wrong type
declarations (read, wrong usage of .. function:: directives) for builtins
like int, float, bool, list etc. Because the directives change, the roles used
to link to
Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com added the comment:
Per msg129958, attached is my stab at a patch to replace most uses of
os.popen() with the subprocess module. The test suite passes on my Mac, but the
patch does touch some specific-to-other-platform code, so further testing is
obviously
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com added the comment:
Per msg129958, attached is my stab at a patch to replace most uses of
os.popen() with the subprocess module. The test suite passes on my Mac, but
the patch does
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
title: BufferedRandom: write(); read() gives different result using io and
_pyio - BufferedRandom, BufferedRWPair: issues with interlaced read-write
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Tarek, can you confirm that the bug is closed?. It is reported as open in the
tracker.
Could you possibly close it, if appropiate?.
--
assignee: tarek -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
