On Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:10:45 PM UTC+2, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> WSGI would enable you to write a persistent application that sits
> around waiting for requests and returns responses for them as and
> when, as opposed to a simple CGI script that gets started each time a
> request comes in, an
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:35:20 -0700, rusi wrote:
(extracting the text without the ASCII-art)
> > “When I get new information, I change my position. What, sir,
> > do you do with new information?” —John Maynard Keynes
> > “Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a
> > finite wor
Yesterday I released a new version of the decorator module. It should run under
Python 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3. I did not have the will to
install on my machine 8 different versions of Python, so I just tested it with
Python 2.7 and 3.3. But I do not feel happy with that. Is there
> \ “When I get new information, I change my position. What, sir, |
> `\ do you do with new information?” —John Maynard Keynes |
> _o__) |
> \ “Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a
On 10/18/2012 10:30 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
reference.pdf from python document has the following description. It
is not accessible from help() in the command line. Is there an
alternative so that I can quickly access these class attributes or
method names from the command line?
object.__call__(s
Hi,
reference.pdf from python document has the following description. It
is not accessible from help() in the command line. Is there an
alternative so that I can quickly access these class attributes or
method names from the command line?
object.__call__(self [, args... ])
Called when the instanc
On 10/18/2012 09:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:47:48 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>> I never use the backslash at end-of-line to continue a statement to the
>> next. Not only is it a readability problem, but if your editor doesn't
>> have visible spaces, you can accidentally
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:08:37 -0700, David wrote:
> Hello, how to add if...else... switch to doctest?
Step 1):
Write your doctest with the switch. Don't forget to test both branches:
>>> global_var = True
>>> if global_var:
... function()
... else:
... function()
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:36:57 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> The accepted rule in print is that lines of prose should be between 45
> and 90 characters, with 66 being ideal for readability. Code is not
> prose, and the combination of fixed-width and much more variable line
> length aids readability,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:59:18 +0200, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 2012-10-18, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>>
>> > What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
>> > over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
>>
>> I try to do what's
On 10/18/2012 8:08 PM, David wrote:
Hello, how to add if...else... switch to doctest?
E.g. function outputs different value when global_var change.
"""
if (global_var == True):
function()
[1,2]
else:
function()
[1,2,3]
"""
doctests should/must be self contained. IE, you would have to set t
David writes:
> Hello, how to add if...else... switch to doctest?
> E.g. function outputs different value when global_var change.
>
> """
> if (global_var == True):
> >>> function()
> [1,2]
> else:
> >>> function()
> [1,2,3]
> """
>
> Thank you very much.
You write the code in a doctest as it wo
On 10/18/2012 2:42 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
Awesome. Pretty much what I figured. Of course, I'll have to dig around
the source just to confirm this with my own eyes (more just curiosity
than anything),
If you do, please followup with a report.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
On 10/18/2012 3:18 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/18/2012 1:23 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
When len() is called passing an immutable built-in type (such as a
string), I'd assume that the overhead in doing so is simply a function
call and there are no on-call calculations done.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:47:48 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> I never use the backslash at end-of-line to continue a statement to the
> next. Not only is it a readability problem, but if your editor doesn't
> have visible spaces, you can accidentally have whitespace after the
> backslash, and wonder wh
Jean-Michel Pichavant writes:
> The 79 char limit purpose is to allow someone to read the code on a 80
> char terminal (and allow old printers to print the code).
There is a very good reason for a strict line width limit regardless of
terminal size: scanning long lines is cognitively more diffic
Hans Mulder writes:
> On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > some_variable = spam('x') + ham(
> > some_longer_variables, here_and_here,
> > and_here_also)
The indentation level for continuation lines shouldn't be dependent on
the content of the
Zero Piraeus writes:
> :
>
(Why is this colon appearing at the top of your messages? Can you remove
it if it's not germane?)
> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
> over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
> 1. Say "screw it" and go past 79, PEP8
Hi there, I am parsing some huge xml files (1.8 Gb) that look like this:
some data
some data
some data
What I am trying to do is build up a dictionary of lists where the key is the
parent scan num and the members of the list are the child scan nums.
I ha
Hello, how to add if...else... switch to doctest?
E.g. function outputs different value when global_var change.
"""
if (global_var == True):
>>> function()
[1,2]
else:
>>> function()
[1,2,3]
"""
Thank you very much.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thursday 18 October 2012 18:40:52 Grant Edwards did opine:
> On 2012-10-18, Den wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:06:43 PM UTC-7, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> >> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
> >
> >> over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the
In article
<5b80dd153d7d744689f57f4fb69af4741671d...@scacmx008.exchad.jpmchase.net>
,
"Prasad, Ramit" wrote:
> I would install python+virtualenv+pip from MacPorts to keep
> it separate from the OS X system Python. MacPorts will take
> care of everything for you as long as you have Xcode install
In article
<53b38fa2-ea8b-4225-bdf3-b9bcbde31...@o5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Python using python-2.7.3-macosx10.6.dmg on my Mac OS
> 10.8.2.
>
> When try to use pip to install packages, I get the following message.
> Then the installation fails.
>
> gcc
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Daniel Urban wrote:
> The source is usually in Objects/*object.c (e.g., the source for list
> is in Objects/listobject.c, dict is in dictobject.c and so on). The
> implementation of __len__ is usually in a method called
> whatever_length (e.g., dict.__len__ is cal
Peng Yu wrote
> Hi,
>
> I installed Python using python-2.7.3-macosx10.6.dmg on my Mac OS
> 10.8.2.
>
> When try to use pip to install packages, I get the following message.
> Then the installation fails.
>
> gcc-4.2 not found, using clang instead
>
>
> I then create a link from /usr/bin/gcc t
Hi,
I installed Python using python-2.7.3-macosx10.6.dmg on my Mac OS
10.8.2.
When try to use pip to install packages, I get the following message.
Then the installation fails.
gcc-4.2 not found, using clang instead
I then create a link from /usr/bin/gcc to gcc-4.2. Then I run pip
again, I get
:
On 18 October 2012 11:55, Den wrote:
> [...] I'm amused by the whole question, and others related
> to PEP8. A quick aside, the width of our roads all go back to the
> width of a two horse rig. The suggested maximum of 80 characters goes
> back to teletype machines, and IBM cards, and charact
:
On 18 October 2012 12:03, wrote:
> yes, but as I have just answered to Zero, is using mod_wsgi a better strategy?
WSGI would enable you to write a persistent application that sits
around waiting for requests and returns responses for them as and
when, as opposed to a simple CGI script that ge
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> I never use the backslash at end-of-line to continue a statement to the
> next. Not only is it a readability problem, but if your editor doesn't
> have visible spaces, you can accidentally have whitespace after the
> backslash, and wonder what
Ian Kelly wrote:
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:39 PM
> To: Python
> Subject: Re: len() on mutables vs. immutables
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Prasad, Ramit
> wrote:
> > Why does pointer arithmetic work for dicts? I would think the position
> > of a value would be based on the hash
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
>> str, bytes, bytearrays, arrays, sets, frozensets, dicts, dictviews, and
>> ranges should all return len in O(1) time. That includes the possibility
>> of a subtraction as indicated above.
>
> Awesome. Pretty much what I figured. Of course, I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Prasad, Ramit
wrote:
> Why does pointer arithmetic work for dicts? I would think the position
> of a value would be based on the hash of the key and thus "random" for
> the context of this conversation.
It doesn't. len() on CPython dicts is O(1) because the dict
Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 1:23 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
>
> > When len() is called passing an immutable built-in type (such as a
> > string), I'd assume that the overhead in doing so is simply a function
> > call and there are no on-call calculations done. Is that correct?
>
> See below.
Hans Mulder wrote:
> On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:06:19 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> >> 3. Say "well, at least it's not a backslash" and break the line using
> >> > parentheses.
> > I mostly do this. Since most lines include a bracket of some sort, I
> > r
> I'm curious as to the implementation (I'd be happy to dig through the
> source, just don't have the time right now). I've seen various
> implementations across interpreters in the past (some which have been
> rather shocking) and I'd like to get some insight into Python (well,
> CPython at this p
David Hutto wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Prasad, Ramit
> wrote:
> > David Hutto wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Demian Brecht
> >> wrote:
[snip]
>
> > The question is whose opinion matters. Yours? Mine? Others? Personally,
> > I heartily second the recommendation to
David Hutto wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:05:12 -0400, Dwight Hutto wrote:
> >
> >> this was just a confidence statement that I'm
> >> intelligent as well, so don't get uppity with me.
> >
> > Please tone down the aggression.
> >
> >
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> > Though technology has moved along swiftly, keeping your code
> > accessible to the guy using a crummy old console xterm might
> > still be worthwhile, and it makes printouts easy to create.
>
> And keeping your inte
On 18 October 2012 12:05, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 10/18/12 04:33, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I use a "double indentation".
> >
> if 'asdf' and 'asdf' and 'asdf' \
> > ... 'asdf' and 'asdf' and \
> > ... 'asdf' and 'asdf':
> > ... print('do if')
> > ... s = 'asdf'
>
Den wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:06:43 PM UTC-7, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> > :
> >
> >
> > What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
> >
> > over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
> >
>
> I personally just keep typing until my statement is finis
On 10/18/2012 11:29 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:> Or the length could be the
difference of two pointers -- address of the
> first empty slot minus address of first item.
That would assume contiguous blocks of memory, which I would find to be
rather dangerous (of an assumption that is) in most dynamic
On 10/18/2012 11:28 AM, Nick Cash wrote:
It appears that list has len() complexity of O(1)
source: http://wiki.python.org/moin/TimeComplexity
It may be worth mentioning that lists in Python are implemented using arrays
instead of linked lists.
It's reasonable to assume that other built-in colle
On 10/18/2012 1:23 PM, Demian Brecht wrote:
When len() is called passing an immutable built-in type (such as a
string), I'd assume that the overhead in doing so is simply a function
call and there are no on-call calculations done. Is that correct?
See below.
I'd also assume that mutable buil
On 2012-10-18, Den wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:06:43 PM UTC-7, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>
>> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
>>
>> over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
>
> I personally just keep typing until my statement is finished
I'm curious as to the implementation (I'd be happy to dig through the
source, just don't have the time right now). I've seen various
implementations across interpreters in the past (some which have been
rather shocking) and I'd like to get some insight into Python (well,
CPython at this point a
On 10/18/2012 12:58 PM, Chris Kaynor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
>
>>
>> But both C++ and Python have automatic concatenation of adjacent
>> strings. So you can just start and end each line with a quote, and
>> leave off the backslash.
>>
> That will work in C++ a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 12:26 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Evan Driscoll
> wrote:
> >>Python isn't as bad as C++ though (my main other language), where
> >>80 characters can go by *very* quickly.
> >>
> >> 2. Ba
On 10/18/2012 12:26 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
>>Python isn't as bad as C++ though (my main other language), where
>>80 characters can go by *very* quickly.
>>
>> 2. Backslash continuations are *terrible*. I hate them with a firery
>>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
>Python isn't as bad as C++ though (my main other language), where
>80 characters can go by *very* quickly.
>
> 2. Backslash continuations are *terrible*. I hate them with a firery
>passion. :-) A line could be 1000 characters long
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> Though technology has moved along swiftly, keeping your code
> accessible to the guy using a crummy old console xterm might
> still be worthwhile, and it makes printouts easy to create.
And keeping your interface accessible to someone who can
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> In fact, I tend to do lots of "otherwise pointless" variables, because I
> want to be able to quickly and easily insert print statements/functions
> without having to split up large commands, during debugging.
When will we next have a langu
Ooo, a good religious war. How could I resist? :-) Bear in mind that
what I say is relative to layout issues, which in the grand scheme of
things. So even if I say I really disklike something, it's still not so
bad in practice. Except for backslash continuations. :-)
On 10/18/2012 01:06 AM, Zero
On 2012-10-18, Den wrote:
> But I have to say I'm amused by the whole question, and others
> related to PEP8. A quick aside, the width of our roads all go
> back to the width of a two horse rig. The suggested maximum of
> 80 characters goes back to teletype machines, and IBM cards,
> and charact
thank you guys for pointing the double posting issue out, I am having some
issues with the news server i am using, so I am doing this via google.groups at
the time! :)
i think i managed to fix it
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2012-10-17, Dwight Hutto wrote:
>> Instead of "diabetic", try inserting the word "black" or "female".
>> There's no shame in those either, yet I think that the offensiveness
>> of either of those words used in that context should be obvious.
>
> To take it a little further, what if I said I got
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:02:40 PM UTC+2, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> Assuming your scripts accept the request as sent and return an
> appropriate response, they are CGI scripts (unless there's some
> wrinkle in the precise definition of CGI that escapes me right now).
yes, they are, but, I came
thank you for the answer!
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:03:02 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> CGI is a protocol between Apache and your script. What you want to do
> is set up Apache to call your CGI scripts.
yes, but as I have just answered to Zero, is using mod_wsgi a better strategy?
--
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:06:43 PM UTC-7, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> :
>
>
> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
>
> over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
>
I personally just keep typing until my statement is finished. This is my
program,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> :
>
> Okay, so, first thing vaguely Python-related that comes to mind [so
> probably not even slightly original, but then that's not really the
> point]:
>
> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
> over 79 cha
On 18 October 2012 16:08, andrea crotti wrote:
> 2012/10/18 Oscar Benjamin :
>>
>> Why not come up with a test that actually shows you if it works? Here
>> are two suggestions:
>>
>> 1) Use time.sleep() so that you know how long the lock is held for.
>> 2) Write different data into the file from e
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:00 AM, lars van gemerden wrote:
> I get your point, since in this case having the custom code option makes the
> system a whole lot less complex and flexible, i will leave the option in. The
> future customer will be informed that they should handle the security around
On 10/18/2012 04:02 AM, Zero Piraeus wrote:> On 18 October 2012 05:22,
wrote:
>>[...]
> By the way: are you using Google Groups? It's just that I'm led to
> understand that it's recently started to misbehave [more than it used
> to], and your replies are addressed to both
> and ,
> which is red
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 10:10 AM, Jeff Jeffries wrote:
> > Hello everybody
> >
> > When I set "AttributeChanges" in my example, it sets the same value for
> all
> > other subclasses. Can someone help me with what the name of this behavior
> > is (mutabl
2012/10/18 Oscar Benjamin :
>
> Why not come up with a test that actually shows you if it works? Here
> are two suggestions:
>
> 1) Use time.sleep() so that you know how long the lock is held for.
> 2) Write different data into the file from each process and see what
> you end up with.
>
Ok thank
On 18 October 2012 15:49, andrea crotti wrote:
> 2012/10/18 Grant Edwards :
>>
>> If what you're guarding against is multiple instances of your
>> application modifying the file, then either of the advisory file
>> locking schemes or the separate lock file should work fine.
>
> Ok so I tried a sma
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 4:29:45 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:07 AM, lars van gemerden
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Chris,
>
> >
>
> > That works like a charm (after replacig "return ns.function" with "return
> > ns['function']" ;-) ).
>
>
>
> Err, yes, I forg
On 10/18/2012 10:10 AM, Jeff Jeffries wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> When I set "AttributeChanges" in my example, it sets the same value for all
> other subclasses. Can someone help me with what the name of this behavior
> is (mutable class global?) ? I don't know any keywords... having
> troubl
On 18 October 2012 15:10, Jeff Jeffries wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> When I set "AttributeChanges" in my example, it sets the same value for all
> other subclasses. Can someone help me with what the name of this behavior is
> (mutable class global?) ? I don't know any keywords... having troub
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:07 AM, lars van gemerden wrote:
> Thanks, Chris,
>
> That works like a charm (after replacig "return ns.function" with "return
> ns['function']" ;-) ).
Err, yes, I forget sometimes that Python doesn't do that. JavaScript
and Pike both let you (though Pike uses -> instea
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:49:35 PM UTC+2, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:41 PM, lars van gemerden
>
> wrote:
>
> > NameError: name 'function' is not defined
>
> >
>
> > which seems an odd error, but i think some global variable is necessary for
> > this to work (if i
- Original Message -
> On 2012-10-18, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>
> > What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that
> > go
> > over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
>
> I try to do what's easiest to read and understand. Sometimes that
> means using a line
On 2012-10-18, andrea crotti wrote:
> 2012/10/18 Grant Edwards :
>> On 2012-10-18, andrea crotti wrote:
>>
>> File locks under Unix have historically been "advisory". That means
>> that programs have to _choose_ to pay attention to them. Most
>> programs do not.
>>
>> Linux does support mandato
On 18 October 2012 14:44, andrea crotti wrote:
> 2012/10/18 Grant Edwards :
>> On 2012-10-18, andrea crotti wrote:
>>
>>
>> File locks under Unix have historically been "advisory". That means
>> that programs have to _choose_ to pay attention to them. Most
>> programs do not.
>>
>> Linux does s
2012/10/18 Grant Edwards :
> On 2012-10-18, andrea crotti wrote:
>
>
> File locks under Unix have historically been "advisory". That means
> that programs have to _choose_ to pay attention to them. Most
> programs do not.
>
> Linux does support mandatory locking, but it's rarely used and must be
On 2012-10-18, andrea crotti wrote:
> I'm trying to understand how I can lock a file while writing on it,
> because I might have multiple processes working on it at the same time.
>
> I found the fcntl.lockf function but if I do this:
>
> In [109]: locked = open('locked.txt', 'w')
>
> In [110]: f
On 2012-10-18, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
> over 79 characters? A few I can think of off the bat:
I try to do what's easiest to read and understand. Sometimes that
means using a line thats 120 characters long, sometimes that means
The code is read much more often than it is written. The PEP8 guidelines are
intended to improve the readability of code. We will take a look at web
frameworks source code readability
(bottle, cherrypy, circuits, django, flask, pyramid, tornado, web.py, web2py
and wheezy.web):
http://mindref.
PyPyODBC - A Pure Python ctypes ODBC module
Features
-Pure Python, compatible with IronPython and PyPy (tested on Win32)
-Almost totally same usage as pyodbc
-Simple and small - the whole module is implemented in a less
than 2000 lines python script
You can simply try pypy
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:41 PM, lars van gemerden
wrote:
> NameError: name 'function' is not defined
>
> which seems an odd error, but i think some global variable is necessary for
> this to work (if i put in globals() instead of {}, it works).
The def statement simply adds a name to the curre
I am trying to implement a way to let users give a limited possibility to
define functions in text, that wille be stored and executed at a later time. I
use exec() to transform the text to a function. The code is as follows:
class code(str):
def __call__(self, *args):
try:
On 10/18/12 04:33, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
> I use a "double indentation".
>
if 'asdf' and 'asdf' and 'asdf' \
> ... 'asdf' and 'asdf' and \
> ... 'asdf' and 'asdf':
> ... print('do if')
> ... s = 'asdf'
> ... ss = 'asdf'
> ...
> do if
if looks_like_it
:
There seems to be a consensus [to the extent there ever is, anyway]
around using parentheses etc., then ...
On 18 October 2012 02:31, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I've been burnt enough by word-wrapping in editors that don't handle word-
> wrapping that well that it makes me really uncomfortable t
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 15:10:33 UTC+5:30, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Ashish Jain wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I have a html string in an object, when I do repr() of that object, I get
> > value as:
>
> >
>
> > {'Id' : 1, 'Body': u' Hello '}
>
> >
>
> > I d
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Anatoli Hristov wrote:
> It does not work the result is "0"
>
> And I don't find any documentation about it :(
Microsoft's official documentation can usually be found at the other
end of a web search. In this case:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:22 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:42:56 AM UTC+2, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>> That is exactly what a webserver does. Is there some reason you don't
>> want to use e.g. Apache to handle the requests?
>
> no reason at all. so i guess the solution is much easier t
On 10/18/12 6:43 AM, David Hutto wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
David,
While I acknowledge and appreciate your efforts to be less aggressive on
this list, I think you have crossed a line by forwarding the contents of
an obviously personal email containing CLEARL
:
On 18 October 2012 05:22, wrote:
> So i guess in that case i do not need cgi or anything?
Assuming your scripts accept the request as sent and return an
appropriate response, they are CGI scripts (unless there's some
wrinkle in the precise definition of CGI that escapes me right now).
> Than
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Hans Mulder wrote:
>
> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
> some_longer_variables,
> here_and_here, and_here_also):
> logger.notice("might be spam")
> move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
> update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
>
This wants
On 10/18/2012 02:19 AM, rusi wrote:
>
>
> IOW the robustness principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
> is as good for human networking as for computers.
>
>
The catch to that is that the software that is liberally accepting
anything is quite vulnerable to attacks. Windows has
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Ashish Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a html string in an object, when I do repr() of that object, I get
> value as:
>
> {'Id' : 1, 'Body': u' Hello '}
>
> I don't wish to have 'u' as the character in my string representation. As
> this is not a valid json notation
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012 11:07:25 UTC+2, Hans Mulder a écrit :
> On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:06:19 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>
> >> 3. Say "well, at least it's not a backslash" and break the line using
>
> >> > parentheses.
>
> > I mostly do this.
Hi,
I have a html string in an object, when I do repr() of that object, I get value
as:
{'Id' : 1, 'Body': u' Hello '}
I don't wish to have 'u' as the character in my string representation. As this
is not a valid json notation now.
Thanks for your help
-Ashish
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:42:56 AM UTC+2, Zero Piraeus wrote:
> That is exactly what a webserver does. Is there some reason you don't
> want to use e.g. Apache to handle the requests?
no reason at all. so i guess the solution is much easier then I have
anticipated.
So i guess in that case
On 18/10/2012 07:06, Zero Piraeus wrote:
:
Okay, so, first thing vaguely Python-related that comes to mind [so
probably not even slightly original, but then that's not really the
point]:
What are people's preferred strategies for dealing with lines that go
over 79 characters? A few I can think
On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:06:19 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>> 3. Say "well, at least it's not a backslash" and break the line using
>> > parentheses.
> I mostly do this. Since most lines include a bracket of some sort, I
> rarely need to add outer parent
:
On 18 October 2012 04:10, wrote:
> I will give you an example. So let us say I create two simple python
> scripts, one does the sum of two numbers
> the other one does the multiplication. SO now I want to put these
> scripts on the server. Now let us say there is a web page that would
> like t
It does not work the result is "0"
And I don't find any documentation about it :(
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Anatoli Hristov wrote:
> Thank you,
>
> I will test this, will keep you posted.
>
> Anatoli
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:07 A
To explain, I am basically doing different algorithms and would like to make
them work and be accessible as I mentioned in the example... and to add them to
the functionality of a specific page... so I have experience in programming,
just no experience in web development etc..
On Thursday, Oct
:
On 18 October 2012 03:18, wrote:
> Here is what I need to do: on some webpage (done in php, or any other
> different technology), user inputs some data, that data and the
> request then goes to the server where python scripts calculate
> something and return the result to the users end.
>
> No
On Oct 18, 11:27 am, David Hutto wrote:
> > [BTW This was enunciated 2000 years ago by a clever chap: Love your
> > enemies; drive them crazy
>
> That only works if they're not already insane.
> Otherwise you're just prodding a cornered beast.
Usually but not necessarily
http://en.wikipedia.org/w
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
