webmas...@terradon.nl wrote:
>
>But now i am wondering how to trace sessions? it is needed for a
>multiplayer game, connected to a webserver. How do i trace a PHP-session?
>I suppose i have to save a cookie with the sessionID from the webserver?
Yes. The server will send a Set-Cookie: header wit
I have written a GUI that gets data sent to it in real time and this data is
displayed in a table. Every time data is sent in it is displayed in the table
in a new row. My problem is that I would like to have the data just replace the
old in the first row.
The table has 6 columns (A, B, C, D, E
RBotha wrote:
>
>I'm facing the following problem:
>
>"""
>In a city of towerblocks, Spiderman can
>cover all the towers by connecting the
>first tower with a spider-thread to the top
>of a later tower and then to a next tower
>and then to yet another tower until he
>reaches the end of the
I tried the following:
Am_cor=np.vectorize(Am_cor)
#plt.plot(t, signal, color='blue', label='Original signal')
fig=plt.figure()
plt.xlabel('Time(minute)')
plt.ylabel('$ Re()$')
plt.xlim([t[0], t[-1]])
plt.ylim((-.3*a1-a1,a1+.3*a1))
plt.grid()
plt.plot(t,Am_cor(t),'o-',label='with parallax', marke
MacroPy is a pure-python library that allows user-defined AST rewrites as part
of the import process (using PEP 302). In short, it makes mucking around with
Python's semantics so easy as to be almost trivial: you write a function that
takes an AST and returns an AST, register it as a macro, and
On 04/23/2013 06:40 PM, Ana Dionísio wrote:
The condition I want to meet is in the first column, so is there a way to read
only the first column and if the condition is true, print the rest?
The CSV module will read a row at a time, but nothing gets printed till
you print it. So starting wi
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:57:17 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
> On 23/04/2013 15:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:05:53 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>>
>>> I did a lot of work comparing the overall performance of the sieve
>>> when using either lists or arrays and I found that lists
On 24/04/2013 01:28, animemaiden wrote:
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:02:08 PM UTC-4, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> numberOfVertices = int(infile.readline().decode()) # Read the first line from
the file
> AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'readline'
...
> infile = filedialog.askopen
On Apr 24, 9:13 am, vasudevram wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:52:57 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, vasudevram wrote:
> > > I saw an example of defining a class within another class
> > > In what way is this useful?
>
> > In that particular case they're just
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:02:08 PM UTC-4, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > numberOfVertices = int(infile.readline().decode()) # Read the first line
> > from the file
>
> > AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'readline'
>
> ...
>
> > infile = filedialog.askopenfilename()
>
>
>
> Thi
> numberOfVertices = int(infile.readline().decode()) # Read the first line from
> the file
> AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'readline'
...
> infile = filedialog.askopenfilename()
This is just returning a filename. You need to open it to get a file
object. For example:
in
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:41:27 PM UTC-4, animemaiden wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to display a graph in Tkinter that reads a graph from a file and
> displays it on a panel which the first line in the file contains a number
> that indicates the number of vertices (n). The vertices are l
Hi,
I'm trying to display a graph in Tkinter that reads a graph from a file and
displays it on a panel which the first line in the file contains a number that
indicates the number of vertices (n). The vertices are labeled as 0,1,…,n-1.
Each subsequent line, with the format u x y v1, v2, …descr
The enumerate function should allow you to check whether you are in the
first iteration.
Like so:
for row_number, row in enumerate(csv.reader(<...>)):
if enumerate == 0:
if :
break
...
Enumerate allows you to know how far into the iterati
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:52:57 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, vasudevram wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hi list,
>
> >
>
> > I saw an example of defining a class within another class, here, in the
> > docs for peewee, a simple ORM for Python:
>
> >
>
> > http://peewee.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, R. Michael Weylandt
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering if it possible to use pandoc instead of rst to document
>> python. Is there a documentation system support this format of python
>> document?
Sorry for the con
The condition I want to meet is in the first column, so is there a way to read
only the first column and if the condition is true, print the rest?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ana Dionísio wrote:
> Thank you, but can you explain it a little better? I am just starting in
> python and I don't think I understood how to apply your awnser
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
#!/usr/local/pypy-1.9/bin/pypy
import csv
On 23 April 2013 22:41, Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 22:29, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> I just thought I'd add that Python 3 has a convenient way to avoid
>> this problem with next() which is to use the starred unpacking syntax:
>>
>> >>> numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>> >>> first, *numbers =
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if it possible to use pandoc instead of rst to document
> python. Is there a documentation system support this format of python
> document?
Pandoc is a converter while rst is a format so they're not directly
comparable; pando
Hi,
I'm wondering if it possible to use pandoc instead of rst to document
python. Is there a documentation system support this format of python
document?
--
Regards,
Peng
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, vasudevram wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I saw an example of defining a class within another class, here, in the docs
> for peewee, a simple ORM for Python:
>
> http://peewee.readthedocs.org/en/latest/peewee/quickstart.html
>
> In what way is this useful?
In that parti
Thank you, but can you explain it a little better? I am just starting in python
and I don't think I understood how to apply your awnser
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi list,
I saw an example of defining a class within another class, here, in the docs
for peewee, a simple ORM for Python:
http://peewee.readthedocs.org/en/latest/peewee/quickstart.html
In what way is this useful?
Thanks,
Vasudev
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ana Dionísio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I need to read a CSV file that has "n" rows and "m" columns and if a
> certain condition is met, for exameple n==200, it prints all the columns in
> that row. How can I do this? I tried to save all the data in a
> multi-dimensional
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Kyle Shannon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Rodrick Brown
> wrote:
>> I thought I read some where that strptime() will pad 0's for day's for some
>> reason this isnt working for me and I'm wondering if i'm doing something
>> wrong.
>>
> from dateti
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> I thought I read some where that strptime() will pad 0's for day's for some
> reason this isnt working for me and I'm wondering if i'm doing something
> wrong.
>
from datetime import datetime
dt = datetime.strptime('Apr 9 2013', '%b
On 23 April 2013 22:29, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> I just thought I'd add that Python 3 has a convenient way to avoid
> this problem with next() which is to use the starred unpacking syntax:
>
> >>> numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4]
> >>> first, *numbers = numbers
>
That creates a new list every time. You'll
Hello!
I need to read a CSV file that has "n" rows and "m" columns and if a certain
condition is met, for exameple n==200, it prints all the columns in that row.
How can I do this? I tried to save all the data in a multi-dimensional array
but I get this error:
"ValueError: array is too big."
In Rodrick Brown
writes:
> I thought I read some where that strptime() will pad 0's for day's for some
> reason this isnt working for me and I'm wondering if i'm doing something
> wrong.
> >>> from datetime import datetime
> >>> dt = datetime.strptime('Apr 9 2013', '%b %d %Y')
> >>> dt.day
> 9
On 23 April 2013 17:30, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The definition of the for loop is sufficiently simple that this is
>> safe, with the caveat already mentioned (that __iter__ is just
>> returning self). And calling next() inside the loop will si
I thought I read some where that strptime() will pad 0's for day's for some
reason this isnt working for me and I'm wondering if i'm doing something
wrong.
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> dt = datetime.strptime('Apr 9 2013', '%b %d %Y')
>>> dt.day
9
>>>
How can I get strptime to run 09? ins
On 23 April 2013 21:49, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
> ri= iter(range(3))
> for i in ri:
> for j in ri:
> print(i,j)
> # this is somewhat deceptive as the outer loop executes just once
> 0 1
> 0 2
>
> I personally would add a 'break' after 'outer_line = next(f)', since the
> first loop is e
On 4/23/2013 11:40 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
construct (eliding some details):
f = open(filename)
for line in f:
if re.search(pattern1, line):
outer_line = f.next()
for inner_line in f:
On 23/04/2013 21:00, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
> On 4/23/2013 12:57 PM, Blind Anagram wrote:
>
>> So, all I was doing in asking for advice was to check whether there is
>> an easy way of avoiding the slice copy,
>
> And there is.
>
>> not because this is critical,
>> but rather because it is a pity
On 23 April 2013 21:00, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
>
> That said, I do see that tuple/list.index have had start, stop paramaters
> added, so doing the same for .count is conceivable.
Are those new? I don't remember them not being there.
You need the start/stop parameters to be able to use index for
Hi,
since there were some questions about template-engines some time ago,
I would like to announce:
- I updated my comparison and benchmarks of several template-engines
on http://www.simple-is-better.org/template/
- I have released a new version of my small and simple but powerful and
pythoni
On 4/23/2013 12:57 PM, Blind Anagram wrote:
So, all I was doing in asking for advice was to check whether there is
an easy way of avoiding the slice copy,
And there is.
not because this is critical,
but rather because it is a pity to limit the performance because Python
forces a (strictly un
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:13:38 -0700, Ana Dionísio wrote:
> I have an array and I need pick some data from that array and put it in
> a list, for example:
>
> array= [a,b,c,1,2,3]
>
> list=array[0]+ array[3]+ array[4]
>
> list: [a,1,2]
>
> When I do it like this: list=array[0]+ array[3]+ array[4
On 23 April 2013 19:30, Blind Anagram wrote:
> On 23/04/2013 18:45, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> You keep mentioning that you want it to work with a large sieve. I
>> would much rather compute the same quantities with a small sieve if
>> possible. If you were using the Lehmer/Meissel algori
On 4/23/2013 7:45 AM, Blind Anagram wrote:
I then wondered why count for lists has no limits
Probably because no one has asked for such, as least partly because it
is not really needed. In any case, .count(s) is a generic method. It is
part of the definition of a Sequence. It can also be imp
On 23/04/2013 18:45, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
I did a lot of work comparing the overall performance of the sieve when
using either lists or arrays and I found that lists were a lot faster
for the majority use case when the sieve is not large.
>>>
>>> And when the sieve is large?
>>
>>
On 23 April 2013 17:57, Blind Anagram wrote:
> On 23/04/2013 15:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:05:53 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>>
>>> I did a lot of work comparing the overall performance of the sieve when
>>> using either lists or arrays and I found that lists were a lot f
On Apr 22, 2:03 pm, Olive wrote:
> I am using virtualenv and pip (from archlinux). What I have done:
> virtualenv was installed by my distribution. I have made a virtual
> environment and activate it, it has installed pip, so far so good.
>
> Now I am trying to install package in the virtualenvir
On 23/04/2013 15:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:05:53 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>
>> I did a lot of work comparing the overall performance of the sieve when
>> using either lists or arrays and I found that lists were a lot faster
>> for the majority use case when the sieve i
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:42:41 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> I love this list. If I make a mistake, it's sure to be caught by someone
> else.
No it's not!
Are-you-here-for-the-five-minute-argument-or-the-full-ten-minutes-ly y'rs,
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The definition of the for loop is sufficiently simple that this is
>> safe, with the caveat already mentioned (that __iter__ is just
>> returning self). And calling next() inside the loo
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The definition of the for loop is sufficiently simple that this is
>> safe, with the caveat already mentioned (that __iter__ is just
>> returning self). And calling next() inside the lo
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:40:31 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
> In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following construct
> (eliding some details):
>
> f = open(filename)
> for line in f:
> if re.search(pattern1, line):
> outer_line = f.next()
> for i
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> The definition of the for loop is sufficiently simple that this is
> safe, with the caveat already mentioned (that __iter__ is just
> returning self). And calling next() inside the loop will simply
> terminate the loop if there's nothing th
احلى مجموعة كفرات فيس بوك facebook covers 2013
http://natigtas7ab.blogspot.com/2013/04/facebook-covers-2013.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
> construct (eliding some details):
>
> f = open(filename)
> for line in f:
> if re.search(pattern1, line):
> outer_line = f.next()
> for inner
Roy Smith wrote:
> In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
> construct (eliding some details):
>
> f = open(filename)
> for line in f:
> if re.search(pattern1, line):
> outer_line = f.next()
> for inner_line in f:
> if re.search(patte
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
> construct (eliding some details):
>
> f = open(filename)
> for line in f:
> if re.search(pattern1, line):
> outer_line = f.next()
> for inner
On 23 April 2013 16:40, Roy Smith wrote:
> In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
> construct (eliding some details):
>
> f = open(filename)
> for line in f:
> if re.search(pattern1, line):
> outer_line = f.next()
> for inner_line in
On Monday, April 22, 2013 8:24:40 AM UTC-4, arif7...@gmail.com wrote:
> Note that:- I have some experience of using Selenium IDE and Webdriver
> (Java). but no prior experience of Python.
>
>
>
> Now there is a project for which I will need to work with webdriver + Python.
>
>
>
> So far I
In reviewing somebody else's code today, I found the following
construct (eliding some details):
f = open(filename)
for line in f:
if re.search(pattern1, line):
outer_line = f.next()
for inner_line in f:
if re.search(pattern2, inner_line):
Ulrich Eckhardt writes:
> So again, why is one faster than the other? What am I missing?
The .format() syntax is actually a function, and that alone carries some
overload. Even optimizing the lookup may give a little advantage:
>>> from timeit import Timer
>>> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c
Am 23.04.2013 10:26, schrieb Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
consider using string % formatting rather than the format metho
with gdb, can you find referents of an object given an object id?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-04-23 09:30, Tim Chase wrote:
> > But a csv.DictReader might still be more efficient. I never
> > tested. This is the only place I've used this "optimization".
> > It's fast enough. ;)
>
> I believe the csv module does all the work at c-level, rather than
> as pure Python, so it should be
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> # Using Python 3.3.
>
> py> from timeit import Timer
> py> setup = "a = 'spam'; b = 'ham'; c = 'eggs'"
> py> t1 = Timer("'%s, %s and %s for breakfast' % (a, b, c)", setup)
> py> t2 = Timer("'{}, {} and {} for breakfast'.format(a, b, c)", s
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:05:53 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
> I did a lot of work comparing the overall performance of the sieve when
> using either lists or arrays and I found that lists were a lot faster
> for the majority use case when the sieve is not large.
And when the sieve is large?
I don't
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:46:53 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>> If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds
>> off, consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
>
> Why? I don't see any obvious difference b
> But a csv.DictReader might still be more efficient.
Depends on what efficiency you care about. The DictReader class is
implemented in Python, and builds a dict for every row. It will never
be more efficient CPU-wise than instantiating the csv.reader type
directly and only doing what you need.
Folks,
I would like to install a Python module from a complete library. So, my
question: if I already have a fully build Python module libMyModule.so,
is there a way to use setup.py to just install it, skipping the build step?
Here are details if needed:
My build process consists of 2 steps
On 2013-04-23 13:36, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-04-22, Colin J. Williams wrote:
> > Since I'm only interested in one or two columns, the simpler
> > approach is probably better.
>
> Here's a sketch of how one of my projects handles that situation.
> I think the index variables are invaluable d
On 23 April 2013 14:36, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-04-22, Colin J. Williams wrote:
>> Since I'm only interested in one or two columns, the simpler
>> approach is probably better.
>
> Here's a sketch of how one of my projects handles that situation.
> I think the index variables are invaluable
On 2013-04-22, Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Since I'm only interested in one or two columns, the simpler
> approach is probably better.
Here's a sketch of how one of my projects handles that situation.
I think the index variables are invaluable documentation, and
make it a bit more robust. (Python
On 04/23/2013 02:58 AM, inshu chauhan wrote:
Yes Simultaneously means all three running at the same time, I looked up
zip just now, but will it not disturb my dictionaries ?
And yes the dictionaries have same number of keys.
More crucially, do all the dictionaries have the *same* keys? If so,
This seemed to work.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from email.mime.image import MIMEImage
from email.mime.text import MIMEText
from email.mime.multipart import MIMEMultipart
from email.iterators import typed_subpart_iterator
from email.generator import Generator, BytesGenerator
import email.iterators
imp
On Apr 23, 11:44 am, Rui Maciel wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Nobody forces you to do anything. Python is open source, and the source
> > code is freely available.
>
> That goes both ways, with the added benefit that python-tkinter is already
> available in distro's official repositories. I
On 23/04/2013 12:08, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 08:05, Blind Anagram wrote:
>> On 23/04/2013 00:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:19 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>>>
But when using a sub-sequence, I do suffer a significant reduction in
speed for a coun
Thx ! I will update my 0.6 version!
Cheers
Karim
On 09/04/2013 21:38, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to announce the release of xlrd 0.9.2:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd/0.9.2
This release includes the following changes:
- Fix some packaging issues that meant docs and examples
Hello. Can you please tell me, how compatible is this version with older
versions? In Fedora/CentOS we have versions 0.7 and 0.6. Can I release and
Fedora/EPEL update to 0.9.2?
Thank you.
SAL
Dňa utorok, 9.
On 23 April 2013 08:05, Blind Anagram wrote:
> On 23/04/2013 00:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:19 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>>
>>> But when using a sub-sequence, I do suffer a significant reduction in
>>> speed for a count when compared with count on the full list. When
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Rodrick Brown wrote:
>
>> I would like some feedback on possible solutions to make this script run
>> faster.
>
> If I had to guess, I would think this stuff:
>
>> line = line.replace('mediacdn.xxx.com', 'med
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:34 AM, chandan kumar wrote:
> Python Ver: 2.5
Old. Please upgrade to 2.7.4 ASAP.
> ser=ser=serial.Serial(port=21,baudrate=9600)
That double `ser=` thing is not necessary. It should only be `ser =
serial.Serial(port=21, baudrate=9600)`.
Look at Phil Birkelbach’s pos
inshu chauhan wrote:
> This statement is giving me the following error
>
> Statement:
> for p, k, j in zip(sorted(segments.iterkeys(), class_count.iterkeys(),
> pixel_count.iterkeys())):
>
> Error:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Users\inshu\Desktop\Training_segs_trial2.py", l
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
> Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
>>
>> If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
>> consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
>
>
> Why? I don't see any obvious difference
Am 23.04.2013 09:13, schrieb inshu chauhan:
This statement is giving me the following error
Statement:
for p, k, j in zip(sorted(segments.iterkeys(), class_count.iterkeys(),
pixel_count.iterkeys())):
Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\inshu\Desktop\Training_segs_trial2.
Am 23.04.2013 06:00, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
If it comes down to micro-optimizations to shave a few microseconds off,
consider using string % formatting rather than the format method.
Why? I don't see any obvious difference between the two...
Greetings!
Uli
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
Ana Dionísio於 2013年4月23日星期二UTC+8上午2時13分38秒寫道：
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I need your help!
>
>
>
> I have an array and I need pick some data from that array and put it in a
> list, for example:
>
>
>
> array= [a,b,c,1,2,3]
>
>
>
> list=array[0]+ array[3]+ array[4]
>
>
>
> list: [a,1,2]
>
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Rui Maciel wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> 30 years ago, people weren't using Tk.
>
> And after 30 years gone by, some people still don't use Tk, let alone
> Tkinter. There is absolutely no reason to force them to install that if
> they don't need to.
Agreed;
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:13 PM, inshu chauhan wrote:
> This statement is giving me the following error
>
> Statement:
> for p, k, j in zip(sorted(segments.iterkeys(), class_count.iterkeys(),
> pixel_count.iterkeys())):
You probably want to sort them separately. By the way, using
iterkeys() isn't
On 2013.04.23 00:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Obviously you cannot display an X window without
> X, well duh, but merely importing tkinter doesn't require an X display.
Importing it doesn't. Doing anything useful with it, however, does. Would you
consider the engine an optional part of a car? Af
This statement is giving me the following error
Statement:
for p, k, j in zip(sorted(segments.iterkeys(), class_count.iterkeys(),
pixel_count.iterkeys())):
Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\inshu\Desktop\Training_segs_trial2.py", line 170, in
access_segments(segimage
On 23/04/2013 00:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:19 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>
>> But when using a sub-sequence, I do suffer a significant reduction in
>> speed for a count when compared with count on the full list. When the
>> list is small enough not to cause memory al
Thanks Gary.
>
> Be clearer about the problem please.
>
> Do you wish to produce a loop that:
> On pass 1, each of p,k, and t hold the first item of their respective
> lists, and
> on pass 2, each of p,k, and t hold the second item of their respective
> lists, and
> so on
> until one (or a
On 23/04/2013 02:47, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 04/22/2013 05:32 PM, Blind Anagram wrote:
>> On 22/04/2013 22:03, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>> On 22 April 2013 21:18, Oscar Benjamin
>>> wrote:
On 22 April 2013 17:38, Blind Anagram wrote:
> On 22/04/2013 17:06, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>>
zip isn't doing the required
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, inshu chauhan wrote:
> Yes Simultaneously means all three running at the same time, I looked up
> zip just now, but will it not disturb my dictionaries ?
> And yes the dictionaries have same number of keys.
>
> thanks
>
>
> On Tue, A
On 04/22/2013 11:40 PM, inshu chauhan wrote:
i have to implement the below line in one of my code:
for p in sorted(segments.iterkeys()) and for k in
sorted(class_count.iterkeys()) and for j in
sorted(pixel_count.iterkeys()):
Its giving me a syntax error which is obvious, but how can I make
On 23/04/2013 00:28, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:25:50 +0100, Blind Anagram wrote:
>
>> I have looked at solutions based on listing primes and here I have found
>> that they are very much slower than my existing solution when the sieve
>> is not large (which is the majority use
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> No, the job of the package system is to manage dependencies. It makes no
> guarantee about whether or not something will "work".
The purpose of establishing dependencies is to guarantee that once a
software package is installed, all the necessary components needed for it
Yes Simultaneously means all three running at the same time, I looked up
zip just now, but will it not disturb my dictionaries ?
And yes the dictionaries have same number of keys.
thanks
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:40 PM, inshu chauhan
>
Chris Angelico wrote:
> 30 years ago, people weren't using Tk.
And after 30 years gone by, some people still don't use Tk, let alone
Tkinter. There is absolutely no reason to force them to install that if
they don't need to.
> We've moved on beyond worrying about the odd kilobyte of space.
96 matches
Mail list logo
