On Saturday, December 7, 2013 7:54:50 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 12/6/13 8:03 AM, rusi wrote:
> > Leaving aside whose fault this is (very likely buggy google groups),
> > this mojibaking cannot happen if the assumption "All text is ASCII"
> > were to uniformly hold.
> > Of course with
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, rusi wrote:
> On Saturday, December 7, 2013 8:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
>> > That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
>> > mailing list config. No??
>
>> If in doubt, blame someo
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> --
> extracols = sorted(set.union(*(set(t.data.keys()) for t in tracks))) if
> tracks else []
> --
> c2s = compids2songs(set(targets.keys()) |
> set.un
In article ,
Dan Stromberg wrote:
> A lot of things people do with regex's, could be done with string methods
> more clearly and concisely.
That is true. The problem is, there are a lot of things for which regex
is the right tool, but people get out of practice using them (or never
learned h
On 12/06/2013 06:07 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/12/2013 01:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mark Lawrence
wrote:
Sorry but I don't get it :)
[explained the joke]
Clearly that went straight over your head.
In article <52a290ed$0$30003$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In contrast, that is not the case with nearly all web forums. By
> deliberate design, or mere ignorance and neglect, they mix up the message
> you care about ("Hi Bob...") and the stuff you need to get t
In article <52a287cb$0$30003$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The ternary if is slightly unusual and unfamiliar
It's only unusual an unfamiliar if you're not used to using it :-)
Coming from a C/C++ background, I always found the lack of a ternary
expression rath
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano <
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:54:22 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> > Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the
> > direction of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding tempo
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 8:11:45 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
> > That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
> > mailing list config. No??
> If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
> I'd first check what your browser's
On 07/12/2013 02:41, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
mailing list config. No??
If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
I'd first check what your browser's actually sending. Firebug will
help ther
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:13:54 -0800, rusi wrote:
> On Thursday, December 5, 2013 6:28:54 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
>> The real problem with web forums is they conflate transport and
>> presentation into a single opaque blob, and are pretty much universally
>> designed to be a closed system. M
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, rusi wrote:
> That seems to suggest that something is not right with the python
> mailing list config. No??
If in doubt, blame someone else, eh?
I'd first check what your browser's actually sending. Firebug will
help there. See if your form fill-out is encoded as
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> As for readability, I accept that ternary if is unusual compared to other
> languages...
All the C-derived ternary operators put the condition first, but
Python puts the condition in the middle. What that does for
readability I don't really
On Saturday, December 7, 2013 12:30:18 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> > illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
> > "unicode as a medium is universal in the same wa
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:20:27 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 05:14 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> I'm thinking mostly of stackoverflow, but here's an example I ran into
>> (a lot of) on a job:
>>
>> somevar = some_complicated_thing(somevar) if
>> some_other_complicated_thing(somevar) el
On 12/6/13 8:03 AM, rusi wrote:
I think you're off on the wrong track here. This has nothing to do with
>plain text (ascii or otherwise). It has to do with divorcing how you
>store and transport messages (be they plain text, HTML, or whatever)
>from how a user interacts with them.
Evidently (
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:54:22 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the
> direction of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary
> variables with descriptive names? Or using regex's for everything under
> the sun?
All those t
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 01:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mark Lawrence
>> wrote:
>>> Sorry but I don't get it :)
>>
>> [explained the joke]
>
> Clearly that went straight over your head.
*facepalm* Yep, it did. Compl
On 07/12/2013 01:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/12/2013 01:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/6/2013 4:26 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
My apologies if you've seen this before but here is the official
schedule http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-04
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 01:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> On 12/6/2013 4:26 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> My apologies if you've seen this before but here is the official
>>> schedule http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/
>>
>>
>> The PEP number is
On 07/12/2013 01:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/6/2013 4:26 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
My apologies if you've seen this before but here is the official
schedule http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/
The PEP number is not an accident ;-).
Sorry but I don't get it :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas,
On 12/6/2013 4:26 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
My apologies if you've seen this before but here is the official
schedule http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/
The PEP number is not an accident ;-).
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 12/6/2013 12:03 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Is it just me, or is this basically useless?
>>> help(object)
Help on class object in module builtins:
class object
| The most base type
Given that this can be interpreted as 'least desirable', it could
definitely be improved.
Surely a few m
In article ,
Joel Goldstick wrote:
> Aside from django urls, I am not sure I ever wrote regexes in python. For
> some reason they must seem awfully sexy to quite a few people. Back to my
> point above -- ever try to figure out a complicated regex written by
> someone else?
Regex has a bad rap
Hi Gregory,
On 07/12/13 08:39, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> To allow each script to run in its own environment, with minimal
>> chance of inadvertent interaction between the environments, whilst
>> allowing each script the ability to stall on conditions that will be
>> later met by an
On 12/06/2013 03:38 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
def MyFunc(self, originalData):
data = {}
dateStrs = []
for i in xrange(0, len(originalData)):
dateStr, freq, source = originalData[i]
On 06/12/2013 16:51, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
[...]
I thought of that argument later the next day. Your proposal does
unify access if the old obj.x syntax is removed.
As long as obj.x is a very concise way to get attribute named 'x' from
object obj it's somehow odd that identifier x is treated n
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 05:14 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > I'm thinking mostly of stackoverflow, but here's an example I ran into (a
> > lot of) on a job:
> >
> > somevar = some_complicated_thing(somevar) if
> > some_other_complicated_thing(somevar) e
On 2013-12-06 11:37, Igor Korot wrote:
> def MyFunc(self, originalData):
> data = {}
> for i in xrange(0, len(originalData)):
>dateStr, freq, source = originalData[i]
>data[str(dateStr)] = {source: freq}
this can be more cleanly/pythonically written as
def my_
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Joel Goldstick wrote:
>
> > Python lets you iterate over a list directly, so :
> >
> > for d in originalData:
> > dateStr, freq, source = d
> > data[source] = freq
>
> I would make it even simpler:
>
> > f
Hi Gregory,
On 07/12/13 08:53, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> The bare minimum would be protection against inadvertent interaction.
>> Better yet would be a setup that made such interaction annoyingly
>> difficult, and the ideal would be where it was impossible to interfere.
>
> To give
On 12/06/2013 05:14 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I'm thinking mostly of stackoverflow, but here's an example I ran into (a
> lot of) on a job:
>
> somevar = some_complicated_thing(somevar) if
> some_other_complicated_thing(somevar) else somevar
>
> Would it really be so bad to just use an if statem
In article ,
Joel Goldstick wrote:
> Python lets you iterate over a list directly, so :
>
> for d in originalData:
> dateStr, freq, source = d
> data[source] = freq
I would make it even simpler:
> for dateStr, freq, source in originalData:
> data[source] = freq
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 04:54 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the
> direction
> > of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary variables
> > with descriptive names? Or using
On 12/06/2013 04:54 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the direction
> of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary variables
> with descriptive names? Or using regex's for everything under the sun?
>
> What happened to using
On 12/6/13 6:54 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the
direction of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary
variables with descriptive names? Or using regex's for everything under
the sun?
What happened to using classes?
rusi wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 10:11:04 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
You're exaggerating. It's more like 500 years ago. :-)
I was going to say the same until I noticed the "the way people think English
was spoken..."
That makes it unarguable -- surely there are some people who (wrongly)
Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the direction
of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary variables
with descriptive names? Or using regex's for everything under the sun?
What happened to using classes? What happened to the beautiful emphasis on
r
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> - character 33 was permitted to be either the exclamation
> mark ! or the logical OR symbol |
>
> - consequently character 124 (vertical bar) was always
> displayed as a broken bar ¦, which explains why even today
>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> I have following code:
>
> def MyFunc(self, originalData):
> data = {}
> dateStrs = []
> for i in xrange(0, len(originalData)):
>dateStr, freq, source = originalData[i]
>data[str(dateStr)] = {so
On 12/06/2013 11:37 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Hi, ALL,
I have following code:
def MyFunc(self, originalData):
data = {}
dateStrs = []
for i in xrange(0, len(originalData)):
dateStr, freq, source = originalData[i]
data[str(dateStr)] = {source: freq}
rusi wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 1:06:30 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
Which means, if I wanted to (and many examples of this exist), I can
write my own client which presents the same information in different
ways.
Not sure whats your point.
The point is the existence of an alternat
Hi, ALL,
I have following code:
def MyFunc(self, originalData):
data = {}
dateStrs = []
for i in xrange(0, len(originalData)):
dateStr, freq, source = originalData[i]
data[str(dateStr)] = {source: freq}
dateStrs.append(dateStr)
for i in xrange(0
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 16:52, John Ladasky wrote:
>
>> On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:47:54 AM UTC-8, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
>>
>> I try to squeeze out some performance of the code pasted on the link
>>> below.
>>> http://pastebin.com/gMnqprST
>>>
On 06/12/2013 16:52, John Ladasky wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:47:54 AM UTC-8, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
I try to squeeze out some performance of the code pasted on the link below.
http://pastebin.com/gMnqprST
Several comments:
1) I find this program to be very difficult to read, la
Garthy wrote:
The bare minimum would be
protection against inadvertent interaction. Better yet would be a setup
that made such interaction annoyingly difficult, and the ideal would be
where it was impossible to interfere.
To give you an idea of the kind of interference that's
possible, consi
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM, John Ladasky wrote:
> On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:47:54 AM UTC-8, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
>
> > I try to squeeze out some performance of the code pasted on the link
> below.
> > http://pastebin.com/gMnqprST
>
Not that this will speed up your code but you have
Garthy wrote:
To allow each script to run in its own environment, with minimal chance
of inadvertent interaction between the environments, whilst allowing
each script the ability to stall on conditions that will be later met by
another thread supplying the information, and to fit in with existi
My apologies if you've seen this before but here is the official
schedule http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
> Yes, it appears that MT-NewsWatcher is *deeply, deeply* confused about
> encodings and character sets. It doesn't just assume things are ASCII,
> but makes a half-hearted attempt to be charset-aware, but badly. I can
> only imagine that it was written b
On 6 December 2013 18:16, John Ladasky wrote:
> The following two functions return the same result:
>
> x**2
> x*x
>
> But they may be computed in different ways. The first choice can accommodate
> non-integer powers and so it would logically proceed by taking a logarithm,
> multiplying
On Friday, December 6, 2013 11:32:00 AM UTC-8, Nick Cash wrote:
> The reasons why have already been answered, I just wanted to point out that
> Python makes it extremely easy to check these sorts of things for yourself.
Thanks for the heads-up on the dis module, Nick. I haven't played with that
On Friday 06 December 2013 14:30:06 Steven D'Aprano did opine:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> > Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> > illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
> >
> > "unicode as a medium is universal in the same way that
>My question is, what do Python interpreters do with power operators where the
>power is a small constant, like 2? Do they know to take the shortcut?
Nope:
Python 3.3.0 (default, Sep 25 2013, 19:28:08)
[GCC 4.7.2] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
On 2013-12-06 19:01, Neil Cerutti wrote:
On 2013-12-06, John Ladasky wrote:
The following two functions return the same result:
x**2
x*x
But they may be computed in different ways. The first choice
can accommodate non-integer powers and so it would logically
proceed by taking a log
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:03:57 -0800, rusi wrote:
> Evidently (and completely inadvertently) this exchange has just
> illustrated one of the inadmissable assumptions:
>
> "unicode as a medium is universal in the same way that ASCII used to be"
Ironically, your post was not Unicode.
Seriously. I a
On 2013-12-06, John Ladasky wrote:
> The following two functions return the same result:
>
> x**2
> x*x
>
> But they may be computed in different ways. The first choice
> can accommodate non-integer powers and so it would logically
> proceed by taking a logarithm, multiplying by the power
- Original Message -
> The following two functions return the same result:
>
> x**2
> x*x
>
> But they may be computed in different ways. The first choice can
> accommodate non-integer powers and so it would logically proceed by
> taking a logarithm, multiplying by the power (in
The following two functions return the same result:
x**2
x*x
But they may be computed in different ways. The first choice can accommodate
non-integer powers and so it would logically proceed by taking a logarithm,
multiplying by the power (in this case, 2), and then taking the anti-log
Am 06.12.13 14:12, schrieb Jean Dubois:
It works but it's not all clear to me. Can you tell me what "label.bind("<1>", quit)"
is standing for? What's the <1> meaning?
"bind" connects events sent to the label with a handler. The <1> is the
event description; in this case, it means a click with
Is it just me, or is this basically useless?
>>> help(object)
Help on class object in module builtins:
class object
| The most base type
>>>
Surely a few more words, or a pointer to this
http://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#object, would be better?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask
On Friday, December 6, 2013 10:11:04 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:52:48 -0800, iMath wrote:
> >> yes ,I am a native Chinese speaker.I always post question by Google
> >> Group not through email ,is there something wrong with it ?
On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:47:54 AM UTC-8, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
> I try to squeeze out some performance of the code pasted on the link below.
> http://pastebin.com/gMnqprST
Several comments:
1) I find this program to be very difficult to read, largely because there's a
whole LOT of du
On Friday, December 6, 2013 3:07:51 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost
>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti
> > wrote:
>
> >> not something to do commonly. Your proposed syntax leaves the
> >> distinction between valid and i
On Friday, December 6, 2013 9:55:54 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 16:19, rusi wrote:
> > So someone please update that page!
> This is a community so why don't you?
Ok done (at least a first draft)
I was under the impression that anyone could not edit
--
https://mail.python.
Am Freitag, 6. Dezember 2013 17:36:03 UTC+1 schrieb Mark Lawrence:
> > I already did some basic profiling and optimized a lot. Especially > with
> > help of a goof python performance tips list I found.
>
> Wonderful typo -^ :)
>
Oh well :-) ... it was a good one. Just had a quick look at
On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:52:48 -0800, iMath wrote:
yes ,I am a native Chinese speaker.I always post question by Google
Group not through email ,is there something wrong with it ? your
english is a little strange to me .
Mark is writing in fake old-En
On 06/12/2013 16:29, Robert Voigtländer wrote:
Thanks for your replies.
I already did some basic profiling and optimized a lot. Especially > with help
of a goof python performance tips list I found.
Wonderful typo -^ :)
I think I'll follow the cython path.
The geometry approach also s
Thanks for your replies.
I already did some basic profiling and optimized a lot. Especially with help of
a goof python performance tips list I found.
I think I'll follow the cython path.
The geometry approach also sound good. But it's way above my math/geometry
knowledge.
Thanks for your input
On 06/12/2013 16:19, rusi wrote:
On Friday, December 6, 2013 9:23:47 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
(if I remember correctly) I think Mark also
sometimes posts a link to managing Google Groups.
You do, and here it is https://wiki.python.org
On Friday, December 6, 2013 9:23:47 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> (if I remember correctly) I think Mark also
>
> > sometimes posts a link to managing Google Groups.
>
> >
>
> You do, and here it is https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsP
On 06/12/2013 15:34, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
(if I remember correctly) I think Mark also
sometimes posts a link to managing Google Groups.
You do, and here it is https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you ca
On 12/5/13, 10:50 AM, Michael Herrmann wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 4:26:40 PM UTC+1, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 12/5/13, 5:14 AM, Michael Herrmann wrote:
If your library and their dependencies are simply .pyc files, then I
don't see why a zip collated via py2exe wouldn't work on other
platf
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:52:48 -0800, iMath wrote:
> yes ,I am a native Chinese speaker.I always post question by Google
> Group not through email ,is there something wrong with it ? your
> english is a little strange to me .
Mark is writing in fake old-English style, the way people think English
On Friday, December 6, 2013 8:42:02 PM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> The English I used was archaic, please ignore it :)
"Archaic" is almost archaic
"Old" is ever-young
:D
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, December 6, 2013 8:22:48 PM UTC+5:30, iMath wrote:
> 在 2013年12月6日星期五UTC+8下午5时23分59秒，Mark Lawrence写道：
> > On 06/12/2013 06:23, iMath wrote:
> > Dearest iMath, wouldst thou be kind enough to partake of obtaining some
> > type of email client that dost not sendeth double spaced data into t
On 06/12/2013 14:52, iMath wrote:
在 2013年12月6日星期五UTC+8下午5时23分59秒，Mark Lawrence写道：
On 06/12/2013 06:23, iMath wrote:
Dearest iMath, wouldst thou be kind enough to partake of obtaining some
type of email client that dost not sendeth double spaced data into this
most illustrious of mailing lis
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:54 AM, iMath wrote:
> fp=tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=False)
> fp.write(("file '"+fileName1+"'\n").encode('utf-8'))
> fp.write(("file '"+fileName2+"'\n").encode('utf-8'))
>
>
> subprocess.call(['ffmpeg', '-f', 'concat','-i',fp.name, '-c', 'copy',
>
在 2013年12月4日星期三UTC+8下午6时51分49秒，Chris Angelico写道：
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Perstinger
> wrote:
>
> > "fp" is a file object, but subprocess expects a list of strings as
>
> > its first argument.
>
>
>
> More fundamentally: The subprocess's arguments must include the *name*
>
在 2013年12月6日星期五UTC+8下午5时23分59秒，Mark Lawrence写道：
> On 06/12/2013 06:23, iMath wrote:
>
>
>
> Dearest iMath, wouldst thou be kind enough to partake of obtaining some
>
> type of email client that dost not sendeth double spaced data into this
>
> most illustrious of mailing lists/newsgroups. T
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:11 AM, rusi wrote:
> Aha! There you are! Its 'page editor' here and not the html which
> 'display source' (control-u) which a browser would show. And wikimedia
> is the software that mediates.
>
> The usual direction (seen by users of wikipedia) is that wikimedia
> takes t
On Friday, December 6, 2013 7:18:19 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:32 AM, rusi wrote:
> > I guess we are using 'structured' in different ways. All I am saying
> > is that mediawiki which seems to present as html, actually stores its
> > stuff as SQL -- nothing more
On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost
wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti
> wrote:
>> not something to do commonly. Your proposed syntax leaves the
>> distinction between valid and invalid identifiers a problem
>> the programmer has to deal with. It doesn't unify acces
Hi Tim,
On 06/12/13 20:47, Tim Golden wrote:
On 06/12/2013 09:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
wrote:
PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be used,
but pytho
> I tried out your suggestions and discovered that I had the line
> import sys to the program. So you can see below what I came up with.
> It works but it's not all clear to me. Can you tell me what
> "label.bind("<1>", quit)" is standing for? What's the <1> meaning?
>
>
>
> #!/usr/bin/env pytho
Hi Chris,
On 06/12/13 22:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> I think the ideal is completely sandboxed, but it's something that I
>> understand I may need to make compromises on. The bare minimum would be
>> protection against inadvertent interaction.
In article ,
Paul Smith wrote:
>One thing I always liked about Perl was the way you can create a single
>installation directory which can be shared between archictures. Say
>what you will about the language: the Porters have an enormous amount of
>experience and expertise producing portable and
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:32 AM, rusi wrote:
> I guess we are using 'structured' in different ways. All I am saying
> is that mediawiki which seems to present as html, actually stores its
> stuff as SQL -- nothing more or less structured than the schemas here:
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manu
On Friday, December 6, 2013 6:49:04 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:03 AM, rusi wrote:
> > SQL databases (assuming thats the mediawiki backend) is another -- ok for
> > data-structuring bad for presentation.
> No, SQL databases don't store structured text. MediaWiki
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:03 AM, rusi wrote:
> SQL databases (assuming thats the mediawiki backend) is another -- ok for
> data-structuring bad for presentation.
No, SQL databases don't store structured text. MediaWiki just stores a
single blob (not in the database sense of that word) of text.
C
Op vrijdag 6 december 2013 13:30:53 UTC+1 schreef Daniel Watkins:
> Hi Jean,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:24:59AM -0800, Jean Dubois wrote:
>
> > I'm trying out Tkinter with the (non object oriented) code fragment below:
>
> > It works partially as I expected, but I thought that pressing
On Friday, December 6, 2013 1:06:30 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Rusi wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 5, 2013 6:28:54 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> > > The real problem with web forums is they conflate transport and
> > > presentation into a single opaque blob, and are pretty much univer
Hi Jean,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:24:59AM -0800, Jean Dubois wrote:
> I'm trying out Tkinter with the (non object oriented) code fragment below:
> It works partially as I expected, but I thought that pressing "1" would
> cause the program to quit, however I get this message:
> TypeError: quit()
- Original Message -
> I'm trying out Tkinter with the (non object oriented) code fragment
> below:
> It works partially as I expected, but I thought that pressing "1"
> would
> cause the program to quit, however I get this message:
> TypeError: quit() takes no arguments (1 given), I tried
I'm trying out Tkinter with the (non object oriented) code fragment below:
It works partially as I expected, but I thought that pressing "1" would
cause the program to quit, however I get this message:
TypeError: quit() takes no arguments (1 given), I tried changing quit to quit()
but that makes th
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> This sort of code is probably harder to make faster in pure python. You
> could try profiling it to see where the hot spots are. Perhaps the choice of
> arrays or sets might have some speed impact.
I'd make this recommendation MUCH stronger.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Garthy
wrote:
> I think the ideal is completely sandboxed, but it's something that I
> understand I may need to make compromises on. The bare minimum would be
> protection against inadvertent interaction. Better yet would be a setup that
> made such interaction anno
On 12/6/13 4:23 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/12/2013 06:23, iMath wrote:
Dearest iMath, wouldst thou be kind enough to partake of obtaining some
type of email client that dost not sendeth double spaced data into this
most illustrious of mailing lists/newsgroups. Thanking thee for thine
partic
On 06/12/2013 09:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
>> lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be used,
>> but python-list does not seem to. The replies I
Hi Chris,
On 06/12/13 19:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
>> lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be
used,
>> but python-list does not seem to.
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
