[ I think you meant for this to go to python-list, not python-dev.
Sending this to python-list. ]
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Seriously though, error messages are chosen to provide a simple and clear
description that will help the user track down what
On 5/10/14 8:42 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
Ars Technica article a couple of days ago, about Fortran, and what is
likely to replace it:
http://tinyurl.com/mr54p96
uhm, yeeah!
'Julia' is going to give everyone a not so small run for competition;
justifiably so, not just against FORTRAN.
Julia
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 12:57:34 AM UTC+5:30, subhaba...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Room,
I was trying to go through a code given in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward%E2%80%93backward_algorithm[ Forward
Backward is an algorithm of Machine Learning-I am not talking on that
I am just
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a language where
variables were first class values *exactly* the same as ints,
strings, floats etc.
[...]
What you mean by
On 5/10/14 6:35 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Instead, what we have is a world in which Python can be used to write
closed-source software, LibreOffice Writer will happily open a
Microsoft Word document, Samba communicates with Windows computers,
libc can be linked to non-free binaries, etc, etc,
On Sat, 10 May 2014 22:42:13 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/10/2014 10:22 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
It's that declaration that creates the variable, not changing locals().
A Python variable is a name bound to a value (and values, of course, are
objects). If you don't have both pieces,
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:51:59 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Rustom Mody :
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a language where
variables were first class values *exactly* the same as
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:47:55 AM UTC+5:30, Mark H. Harris wrote:
'Julia' is going to give everyone a not so small run for competition;
justifiably so, not just against FORTRAN.
Julia is Matlab and R, Python, Lisp, Scheme; all rolled together on
steroids. Its amazing as a dynamic
On Sun, 11 May 2014 01:17:55 -0500, Mark H Harris wrote:
On 5/10/14 8:42 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
Ars Technica article a couple of days ago, about Fortran, and what is
likely to replace it:
http://tinyurl.com/mr54p96
uhm, yeeah!
'Julia' is going to give everyone a not so small run for
On Sat, 10 May 2014 21:16:06 -0700, Nelson Crosby wrote:
I also believe in this more 'BSD-like' view, but from a business point
of view. No one is going to invest in a business that can't guarantee
against piracy, and such a business is much less likely to receive
profit (see Ardour).
I
On Sat, 10 May 2014 18:28:43 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 05/10/2014 04:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
wrote:
And if you don't like that argument (although it is a perfectly sound
and correct argument), think of the module name
On Sun, 11 May 2014 11:59:21 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
wrote:
Well, with function variables they have to exist *when you use them*.
;)
This seems like more of a scoping issue than a can we create variables
in Python
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:50:32 AM UTC+5:30, subhaba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 12:57:34 AM UTC+5:30, subhaba...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Room,
I was trying to go through a code given in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward%E2%80%93backward_algorithm[
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
Rustom Mody:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a language
where variables were first class values *exactly* the same as
ints, strings, floats etc.
[...]
What you
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 1:56:41 PM UTC+5:30, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
Rustom Mody:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a language
where variables were first class values
Hi,
I want to install Python on a PC with 16GB of RAM and the 64 bit version of
Windows 7.
I want Python to be able to use as much as possible of the RAM.
When I install the 64 bit version of Python I find that sys.maxint ==
2**31 - 1
Whereas the Pythpon installed on my 64 bit linux system
On 5/11/2014 2:56 AM, Ross Gayler wrote:
Hi,
I want to install Python on a PC with 16GB of RAM and the 64 bit version
of Windows 7.
I want Python to be able to use as much as possible of the RAM.
When I install the 64 bit version of Python I find that sys.maxint ==
2**31 - 1
Since
On 11/05/2014 08:45, subhabangal...@gmail.com wrote:
[268 lines snipped]
Would you please use the mailing list
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list or read and action
this https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython to prevent us
seeing double line spacing and single line
Rustom Mody writes:
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 1:56:41 PM UTC+5:30, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
Rustom Mody:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a
language where
On Sun, 11 May 2014 11:26:41 +0300, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Marko Rauhamaa writes:
Rustom Mody:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 2:39:31 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Personally, I don't imagine that there ever could be a language
where variables were first class values *exactly* the
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ross Gayler r.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to install Python on a PC with 16GB of RAM and the 64 bit version of
Windows 7.
I want Python to be able to use as much as possible of the RAM.
When I install the 64 bit version of Python I find that
On 11/05/2014 04:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
And try running
this function in both 2.7 and 3.3 and see if you can explain the
difference:
def test():
if False: x = None
exec(x = 1)
return x
I must confess to being baffled by what happens in 3.3 with this
example. Neither
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 6:21:08 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
The point is, it is *logically impossible* for a language to use
precisely the same syntax for value-assignment and variable-assignment.
Consider the variable called x, which is bound to the value 23. If the
language has a
Hello,
I'd like to be able to analyze incoming audio from a sound card using
Python, and I'm trying to establish a correct architecture for this.
Getting the audio is OK (using PyAudio), as well as the calculations
needed, so won't be discussing those, but the general idea of being able
at
In article 536f869c$0$2178$426a7...@news.free.fr,
lgabiot lgab...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to be able to analyze incoming audio from a sound card using
Python, and I'm trying to establish a correct architecture for this.
Getting the audio is OK (using PyAudio), as well as the
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com:
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 11:51:59 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Lisp variables (symbols) are on an equal footing with other objects.
IOW, lisp variables are objects in the heap.
But is a symbol a variable??
Yes. A classic lisp symbol is even more
Le 11/05/14 16:40, Roy Smith a écrit :
In article 536f869c$0$2178$426a7...@news.free.fr,
lgabiot lgab...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Le 11/05/14 16:40, Roy Smith a écrit :
If you are going to use threads, the architecture you describe seems
perfectly reasonable. It's a classic
Jussi Piitulainen jpiit...@ling.helsinki.fi:
The claim was that Lisp variables are symbols. What do you write in
Common Lisp in place of the ... to have the following evaluate to
the the value of the variable x?
(let ((x (f)) (y 'x)) (... y ...))
No, (eval y) is not an answer, and
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 07:09:27AM +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 01:17:55 -0500, Mark H Harris wrote:
On 5/10/14 8:42 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
Ars Technica article a couple of days ago, about Fortran, and what is
likely to replace it:
http://tinyurl.com/mr54p96
Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl:
Given that Fortran is here for almost 60 years and lot of effort has
been spent to keep it backwards compatible (AFAIK), I wouldn't hold my
breath.
I have seen a glimpse of the so-called scientific computing and Fortran
programming. I can't help but think that
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl wrote:
Given that Fortran is here for almost 60 years and lot of effort has
been spent to keep it backwards compatible (AFAIK), I wouldn't hold my
breath. Something may look like cool and great, but wait ten years and
see if after
Mark H Harris harrismh...@gmail.com writes:
On 5/10/14 8:42 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/mr54p96
'Julia' is going to give everyone a not so small run for competition;
justifiably so, not just against FORTRAN.
Julia is Matlab and R, Python, Lisp, Scheme; all rolled together on
In article 871tw0s2kl@elektro.pacujo.net,
Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl:
Given that Fortran is here for almost 60 years and lot of effort has
been spent to keep it backwards compatible (AFAIK), I wouldn't hold my
breath.
I have seen a glimpse
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 02:42:13AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl wrote:
Given that Fortran is here for almost 60 years and lot of effort has
been spent to keep it backwards compatible (AFAIK), I wouldn't hold my
breath. Something
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl wrote:
And the pipe
extention is one of the things I'd consider - as well as other
similar means, like SOAP or REST.
Yep. My point was, keep the processes separate and it's easy. There
are myriad ways of doing the glue.
ChrisA
--
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
It is fine. Computers are tools. The sign of a good tool is that you
can pick it up and use it without having to read the instruction manual.
I can jump into pretty much any car, start the engine, and drive it,
without any
On 05/11/2014 10:51 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article 871tw0s2kl@elektro.pacujo.net,
Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl:
Given that Fortran is here for almost 60 years and lot of effort has
been spent to keep it backwards compatible (AFAIK), I wouldn't hold
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
For the most part cars are very similar, yet in some circumstances (such as
a vehicle in front of you suddenly stopping) the exact details (such as the
precise location and size and shape of the brake pedal) become
On 5/11/14 9:46 AM, Rotwang wrote:
On 11/05/2014 04:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
And try running
this function in both 2.7 and 3.3 and see if you can explain the
difference:
def test():
if False: x = None
exec(x = 1)
return x
I must confess to being baffled by what
In article mailman.9891.1399833209.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Some things are more standardized than others. A piano keyboard is
incredibly standard, to make it possible to play without having to
look at your fingers (even when jumping your hands
On 5/11/14 12:05 PM, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
Julia is Matlab and R, Python, Lisp, Scheme; all rolled together on
steroids. Its amazing as a dynamic language, and its fast, like
lightning fast as well as multiprocessing (parallel processing) at its
core. Its astounding, really.
Hmmm...
Its
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Mark H Harris harrismh...@gmail.com wrote:
The following code will produce over 100,000 digits of π (pi) in less than 2
seconds on a low-end processor, like my mac mini dual core 2Ghz:
julia prec=524288
524288
julia with_bigfloat_precision(prec) do
Thank you everyone who replied, for your help. Using the command prompt
console, it accepts the first line of code, but doesn't seem to accept the
second line. I have altered it a little, but it is not having any of it, I
quote my console input and output here, as it can probably explain
On 5/11/14 1:59 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
julia prec=524288
524288
julia with_bigfloat_precision(prec) do
println(atan(BigFloat(1)/5)*16 - atan(BigFloat(1)/239)*4)
end
Would it be quicker (and no less accurate) to represent pi as
atan(BigFloat(1))*4 instead? That's how I
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Simon Evans musicalhack...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Thank you everyone who replied, for your help. Using the command prompt
console, it accepts the first line of code, but doesn't seem to accept the
second line. I have altered it a little, but it is not having any
Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net:
I don't see any practical reason for that limitation. If you allow
setq/setf/set!, you have no reason to disallow symbol-value on a local
variable.
In fact, the reason probably is practical and analogous to the locals()
caveat in Python. If the language made
Dear Chris Angelico,
Yes, you are right, I did install Python 3.4 as well as 2.7. I have removed
Python 3.4, and input the code you suggested and it looks like it has installed
properly, returning the following code:-
On 2014-05-11 21:03, Simon Evans wrote:
Dear Chris Angelico,
Yes, you are right, I did install Python 3.4 as well as 2.7. I have removed
Python 3.4, and input the code you suggested and it looks like it has installed
properly, returning the following code:-
On 5/11/2014 3:17 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Simon Evans musicalhack...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
c:\Beautiful Souppython setup.py install.
There is no need for a standalone Beautiful Soup directory. See below.
File setup.py, line 22
print Unit tests have
I have downloaded Beautiful Soup 3, I am using Python 2.7. I understand from
your message that I ought to use Python 2.6 or Python 3.4 with Beautiful Soup
4, the book I am using 'Getting Started with Beautiful Soup' is for Beautiful
Soup 4. Therefore I gather I must re-download Beautiful Soup
On 2014-05-11 23:03, Simon Evans wrote:
I have downloaded Beautiful Soup 3, I am using Python 2.7. I understand from
your message that I ought to use Python 2.6 or Python 3.4 with Beautiful Soup
4, the book I am using 'Getting Started with Beautiful Soup' is for Beautiful
Soup 4. Therefore I
On 11/05/2014 19:40, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 5/11/14 9:46 AM, Rotwang wrote:
On 11/05/2014 04:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
And try running
this function in both 2.7 and 3.3 and see if you can explain the
difference:
def test():
if False: x = None
exec(x = 1)
return x
I
On Sun, 11 May 2014 14:43:19 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
In article mailman.9891.1399833209.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Some things are more standardized than others. A piano keyboard is
incredibly standard, to make it possible to play without having to
Yeah well at no point does the book say to start inputting the code mentioned
in Python command prompt rather than the Windows command prompt, but thank you
for your guidance anyway.
I have downloaded the latest version of Beautiful Soup 4, but am again facing
problems with the second line of
On Monday, May 12, 2014 12:19:24 AM UTC+1, Simon Evans wrote:
Yeah well at no point does the book say to start inputting the code mentioned
in Python command prompt rather than the Windows command prompt, but thank
you for your guidance anyway.
I have downloaded the latest version of
- but wait a moment 'BeautifulSoup4 works with 2.6+ and 3.x'(Terry Reedy) -
doesn't 2.6 + = 2.7, which is what I'm using with BeautifulSoup4.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Simon Evans musicalhack...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Yeah well at no point does the book say to start inputting the code mentioned
in Python command prompt rather than the Windows command prompt, but thank
you for your guidance anyway.
I have downloaded the latest
On 5/11/2014 6:03 PM, Simon Evans wrote:
I have downloaded Beautiful Soup 3, I am using Python 2.7. I
understand from your message that I ought to use Python 2.6or Python
3.4 with Beautiful Soup 4,
I wrote BeautifulSoup4 works with 2.6+ and 3.x..
'2.6+' means 2.6 or 2.7. '3.x' should mean 3.1
On 2014-05-12 00:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 14:43:19 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
In article mailman.9891.1399833209.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Some things are more standardized than others. A piano keyboard is
incredibly standard, to
On Mon, 12 May 2014 04:08:15 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
It is fine. Computers are tools. The sign of a good tool is that you
can pick it up and use it without having to read the instruction
manual. I can jump into pretty
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, use Python 3.4 as Terry Reedy suggested, unless the book is
using 2.7 in which case you should probably use the same version as
the book.
Following up on that, if this is the book you are using:
In article mailman.9900.1399852263.18130.python-l...@python.org,
MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2014-05-12 00:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 14:43:19 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
In article mailman.9891.1399833209.18130.python-l...@python.org,
Chris Angelico
On 12/05/2014 00:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Cars are standardized -- there are basically two types, manuals and
automatics.
Sadly they can still go wrong due to modern engineering practices. In
my neck of the woods some years ago people were killed when standing at
a bus stop, because the
On Mon, 12 May 2014 00:51:01 +0100, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-05-12 00:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 14:43:19 -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
Speaking of which, here's a trivia question. Without looking at your
keyboard, describe how the F and J keys (assuming a US-English key
layout)
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Please do not advise people to unnecessarily downgrade to 2.7 ;-).
Simon just needs the proper current version of BeautifulSoup.
BeautifulSoup3 does not work with 3.x.
BeautifulSoup4 works with 2.6+ and 3.x.
On Mon, 12 May 2014 01:27:17 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 12/05/2014 00:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Cars are standardized -- there are basically two types, manuals and
automatics.
Sadly they can still go wrong due to modern engineering practices. In
my neck of the woods some years ago
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:28:18 PM UTC+5:30, Simon Evans wrote:
I am new to Python, but my main interest is to use it to Webscrape.
I guess you've moved on from this specific problem.
However here is some general advice:
To use beautiful soup you need to use python.
To use python you need to
On 05/11/2014 09:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 00:51:01 +0100, MRAB wrote:
Certainly not. However they may be different where *you* are :-P
I'm using an IBM keyboard, model SK-8820.
Mine have an little ridge on the keytop of those keys.
I've seen keyboards with
On 05/11/2014 02:54 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
julia sin(BigFloat(π/4))
7.0710678118654750275194295621751674626154323953749278952436611913748
20215180412e-01 with 256 bits of precision
That answer doesn't seem to come anywhere near 256 bits of precision.
Using Python 3.2,
On 5/11/14 10:10 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 05/11/2014 02:54 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
julia sin(BigFloat(π/4))
7.0710678118654750275194295621751674626154323953749278952436611913748
20215180412e-01 with 256 bits of precision
That answer doesn't seem to come anywhere near 256 bits of
On Friday, May 9, 2014 4:02:42 PM UTC+7, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Percy Tambunan percy.tambu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hai, I would like to parse this multiple root element XML
Easy fix might be to wrap it in root and /root, which will give
you a new root.
On 5/11/14 11:10 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
On 5/11/14 10:10 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 05/11/2014 02:54 PM, Mark H Harris wrote:
julia sin(BigFloat(π/4))
7.0710678118654750275194295621751674626154323953749278952436611913748
20215180412e-01 with 256 bits of precision
That answer doesn't
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Mark H Harris harrismh...@gmail.com wrote:
Having said that, the accuracy was not my point; in the first place. My
point is that the sin() function is built-in...
So what? Built-in just means that there's no namespacing of
mathematical functions.
ChrisA
--
Le 11/05/14 17:40, lgabiot a écrit :
I guess if my calculation had to be performed on a small number of
samples (i.e. under the value of the Pyaudio buffer size (2048 samples
for instance), and that the calculation would last less than the time it
takes to get the next 2048 samples from
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:33 PM, lgabiot lgab...@hotmail.com wrote:
But AFAIK the python GIL (and in smaller or older computers that have only
one core) does not permit true paralell execution of two threads. I believe
it is quite like the way multiple processes are handled by an OS on a single
Le 12/05/14 07:41, Chris Angelico a écrit :
The GIL is almost completely insignificant here. One of your threads
will be blocked practically the whole time (waiting for more samples;
collecting them into a numpy array doesn't take long), and the other
is, if I understand correctly, spending
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
The default seeding for the random module currently used 32 bytes from
urandom() to create the initial state of the random number generator.
This is far less than the number of possible states 2**19937-1.
I'm not a cryptography expert, but IMO 32
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset fadc06047314 by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default':
Issue #21424: Optimize heaqp.nlargest() to make fewer tuple comparisons.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fadc06047314
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
stage: test needed - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21467
___
___
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35213/rip_nsmallest.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21424
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Several thoughts:
* We're not reading urandom a huge number of times per second. This is just
one read of 2,500 bytes. What Ted is talking about and what we're doing are as
different as night and day.
* We're also not doing this in a loop. It is just
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
http://www.2uo.de/myths-about-urandom/
Thanks, interesting read.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21470
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21470
___
New submission from Antoine Pitrou:
The docs for subprocess.Popen seem to imply that line-buffering is always
available. However, bufsize=1 is a special value only when open the pipes in
text mode, i.e. when universal newlines are enabled.
In the short term, we should probably fix the
New submission from mouad:
Hi,
As most of you know, working behind a HTTP proxy raise all this corner cases
that no one think about until he has to, one of them i had to deal with some
months ago is absolute request URI in HTTP request, that some client will send
when they detect that they
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21471
___
Changes by mouad mouad...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35214/issue21472.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21472
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Ha, it seems actually worse than that, since no buffering argument is ever
passed to the TextIOWrapper constructor. bufsize=1 will simply get ignored,
and line buffering doesn't work at all.
Example under 2.7:
$ python -c 'import subprocess; p =
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21425
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Ok, the not working at all part is issue #21332. Let's make this issue
specific to binary mode, again.
--
nosy: +akira
title: subprocess line-buffering doesn't work - subprocess line-buffering only
works in universal newlines mode
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20115
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset ab3e012c45d0 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.4':
Issue #21425: Fix flushing of standard streams in the interactive interpreter.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ab3e012c45d0
New changeset d1c0cf44160c by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default':
Issue
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Thanks for the report. This should now be fixed in 3.4 and 3.5.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21425
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21389
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18564
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21226
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21422
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21121
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21420
___
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20383
___
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
