Dan Stromberg wrote:
I know that sounds strange: usually we look up values by key, not keys.
But suppose you have a strange key type that despite being equal, is
not identical in some fields, and you need to see those fields.
Is there a way of getting the key used by the dictionary, short
pytest-2.7.2: bug fixes
===
pytest is a mature Python testing tool with more than a 1100 tests
against itself, passing on many different interpreters and platforms.
This release is supposed to be drop-in compatible to 2.7.1.
See below for the changes and see docs at:
New submission from Martin Panter:
While trying to port the example at
https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio-task.html#example-future-with-run-until-complete
to use “async def”, I discovered the ensure_future() function does not like
the coroutine field name changes introduced in Issue
Armin Rigo added the comment:
Also, if we want to be paranoid, the _PyObject_GetAttrId() can return anything,
not necessarily a string object. This would make the following
PyUnicode_FromFormat() fail. So maybe you also want to overwrite failures in
PyUnicode_FromFormat() with the final
How about a random substitution cipher? This will be ultra-weak, but
fast (using bytes.translate/bytes.maketrans) and seems to be the kind
of thing you're asking for.
-- Devin
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Randall Smith rand...@tnr.cc wrote:
Chunks of data (about 2MB) are to be stored on
Armin Rigo added the comment:
I'd guess so: if the PyObject_GetAttrId() fails, then ignore the rest of the
code that was added in https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/fded07a2d616 and jump
straight to ``PyErr_Format(PyExc_ImportError, ...)``.
--
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
It's not the first time that a bug in found in _format_coroutine(). We need
more unit tests!
Previous bug: https://github.com/python/asyncio/issues/222
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
Would I have to do an O(n) search to find my key?
Iterate over it - it's an iterable view in Py3 - and compare.
I think the question was whether the O(n) search could be avoided,
Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com:
I don't think that it's fundamentally broken. A simple example would
be the int 3, vs. the float 3, vs. the Decimal 3. All of them compare
equal to one another, but they are distinct values, and sometimes it
might be useful to be able to determine which one is
Hello,
I am trying to get some old plugins I wrote to wrote on anewer version of
rhythmbox.
When I try to load the plugin I see:
(rhythmbox:3092): libpeas-WARNING **: nowplaying-lcd:
/usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/nowplaying-lcd/libnowplaying-lcd.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or
Chunks of data (about 2MB) are to be stored on machines using a
peer-to-peer protocol. The recipient of these chunks can't assume that
the payload is benign. While the data senders are supposed to encrypt
data, that's not guaranteed, and I'd like to protect the recipient
against exposure to
Florian Bruhin added the comment:
I've now updated to Python 3.4.3 and it's broken there as well.
I tried on two other Windows 8.1 machines (with Python 3.4.3 and 3.4.1
respectively), and I can't reproduce there either...
It works with shell=True indeed.
I wonder why this is only broken on
On 24/06/2015 01:47, Dan Stromberg wrote:
Would I have to do an O(n) search to find my key?
can you use something from here
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sortedcontainers/0.9.6 with the bisect module?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do
Hi everyone!
On June 27th, Code of the Rings, an online coding battle will launch. It's
Free open to all. You will have 24 hours to code and optimize your solution
to a puzzle.
What will be exciting and fun is that it will be VERY EASY to start and to get
something that works, but complex
Zorceta added the comment:
When provided object is not from a file
should be
'When `inspect` can't find the source file of provided object'.
My mistake.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12920
New submission from mattyw:
The comments in test_decimal contain a url for downloading tests written by
Mike Cowlishaw:
Cowlishaw's tests can be downloaded from:
New submission from Jakub Kadlčík:
Hello, I think there are awesome example code snippets in gzip documentation.
No doubt, they helped me a lot.
The only problem is that they are not idiomatic. They look like C more than
Python.
I suggest following patch
--
assignee: docs@python
Martin Panter added the comment:
It looks like this is for Python 2. I agree with the change, but I suggest
back-porting revisions 35c53e7e2280, a01992e219c0 and ae1528beae67 (Issue
21146) instead, to match the Python 3 documentation.
--
nosy: +vadmium
versions: +Python 2.7
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:02 am, Randall Smith wrote:
Chunks of data (about 2MB) are to be stored on machines using a
peer-to-peer protocol. The recipient of these chunks can't assume that
the payload is benign. While the data senders are supposed to encrypt
data, that's not guaranteed, and
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:37 pm, kbtyo wrote:
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 9:50:50 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:15 am, Sahlusar wrote:
That is not the underlying issue. Any thoughts or suggestions would be
very helpful.
Thank you for spending over 100 lines to
Changes by mattyw mat...@me.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39797/24497.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24497
___
Martin Panter added the comment:
For Benno’s original gi_yieldfrom property, I guess the
asyncio.coroutines.CoroWrapper class would need updating. The GeneratorWrapper
class for @types.coroutine probably should be updated too, since it already
supports other internal generator properties.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 3:12:40 PM UTC-4, John Gordon wrote:
In c0ea6bec-b6b1-48fd-9291-0fedcda7b...@googlegroups.com Sahlusar
ahlusar.ahluwa...@gmail.com writes:
However, when I extrapolate this same logic with a list like:
Jorge Herskovic added the comment:
20,000+ iterations of the test suite with my homebuilt 3.4.3 throw no
exceptions.
Weirder and weirder.
Any suggestions? Without any actual knowledge (unencumbered by the thought
process), a concurrency issue in the interpreter itself is my guess.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 10:18:43 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 06:16 am, kbtyo wrote:
I am working on a workflow module that will allow one to recursively check
for file extensions and if there is a match move them to a folder for
processing (parsing, data
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 9:50:50 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:15 am, Sahlusar wrote:
That is not the underlying issue. Any thoughts or suggestions would be
very helpful.
Thank you for spending over 100 lines to tell us what is NOT the underlying
issue. I
Changes by Armin Rigo ar...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: -arigo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24450
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
I would prefer do not repeat the code, but I afraid this can affect the
performance, and the performance of PyDict_GetItem is critical for Python.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Julien Palard mandark@gmail.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24486
___
___
Julien Palard added the comment:
OK, so, requests have a `timeout` and take it into account, and it solves my
problem.
Yet I don't understand one little thing:
With both requests `timeout` parameter set or unset, the exact same
http.client.py:_read_status call the same socket.readinto. With
On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 8:38:24 AM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:37 pm, kbtyo wrote:
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 9:50:50 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:15 am, Sahlusar wrote:
That is not the underlying issue. Any thoughts or
Martin Panter added the comment:
I assume you meant _without_ an explicit timeout setting in Requests, you see a
recvfrom() system call, and _with_ an explicit timeout you see poll(). I guess
that would be because Requests is using a blocking socket in the first case,
and in the second case
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Please let this go forward as Serhiy has written it. That is the way I wrote
the existing known hash function. You all should be focused on correctness,
not on bike-shedding my and Serhiy's coding style.
--
David MacIver da...@drmaciver.com writes:
Author of Hypothesis here. (If you don't know what Hypothesis is, you're
probably not the target audience for this email but you should totally
check it out: https://hypothesis.readthedocs.org/
Oh very cool: a QuickCheck-like unit test library. I
On 2015-06-24, Randall Smith rand...@tnr.cc wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-06-24, Randall Smith rand...@tnr.cc wrote:
On 06/24/2015 06:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I don't understand how mangling the data is supposed to protect the
recipient. Don't they have the
STINNER Victor added the comment:
'Z:\Pr Files\norma' looks wrong '\n' is a single character, a new line. Try to
write r'Z:\Pr Files\norma'.
https://docs.python.org/dev/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-and-bytes-literals
--
nosy: +haypo
___
New submission from Karl Richter:
`gcc` 4.9 is more restictive and recognizes that the empty definition of the
`REQN` macro doesn't use some variables. It's more suitable to wrap the usage
of the macro in the same preprocessor conditionals like the macro definition.
experienced with
New submission from Bob Alexander:
Python session with 3.5b2
Showing existing error:
from shutil import which
Works OK
which(python)
'C:\\Python27\\python.EXE'
Also works OK
which('C:\\Python27\\python.EXE')
'C:\\Python27\\python.EXE'
Fails
which('C:\\Python27\\python')
Showing better
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I originally planned to make the next Cython release patch the Generator
and Coroutine ABCs into collections.abc, but I now think it would be worth
uploading an abc_backports package to PyPI instead that does that and on
which asyncio, tornado and other
New submission from Denis Gordeev:
My code is:
mypath = 'Z:\Pr Files\norma'
file_list = [ f for f in listdir(mypath) if isfile(join(mypath,f))]
Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\uni\click zhenilo
workshop\noise.py, line 13, in
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24504
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Freenet seems to come to mind.. :)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid
wrote:
On 2015-06-24, Randall Smith rand...@tnr.cc wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-06-24, Randall Smith rand...@tnr.cc wrote:
On 06/24/2015 06:36 AM,
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 37c827d9dda4 by Ned Deily in branch '2.7':
Issue #24497: update link in test_decimal comments
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/37c827d9dda4
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jorge Herskovic added the comment:
Finally able to repro on my old Mac Pro at work (Universal 64/32bit 3.4.3 from
python.org, OS X 10.10.3). For some reason I can't quite fathom, there were two
exceptions this time.
Error in atexit._run_exitfuncs:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Stefan Krah added the comment:
If it is a DNS failure, the timeout of 3s indeed looks too low for me.
On a misconfigured machine I'm easily getting timeouts of 20s, (not for
this particular test, just in general, e.g. when using ssh).
--
___
Python
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 3a78be4bcbde by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.4':
Issue #24400: Fix CoroWrapper for 'async def' coroutines
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3a78be4bcbde
New changeset 338597d2e93b by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24400: Fix CoroWrapper for
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
Should be fixed now. Thanks for discovering this, Martin!
Victor, I'll make a PR on github/asyncio with some refactoring or CoroWrapper
etc. The code became too cumbersome, and has to be properly refactored. At
least we should have one wrapper class for
We’re pleased to announce a new venture at this year’s EuroPython...
*** The EuroPython Beginner’s Day ***
https://ep2015.europython.eu/en/events/beginners-day/
If you’re thinking of coming to the conference but you’re new to
Python, this could be the session for you.
Martin Panter added the comment:
Thanks for reviewing this Yury. Here is a new patch:
* Drop the “native” term; distinguish by referring to “async def” where
necessary
* Add generator version of display_date() coroutine example
* Change chained coroutine example over to “async def” and updated
R. David Murray added the comment:
It would have to be a misconfigured machine that doesn't have 'localhost' in
/etc/hosts (so that a lookup of localhost goes through DNS). Or, I suppose,
one that prioritizes the resolver over /etc/hosts (is that even possible?)
I would think other tests
Changes by Jens Diemer bugs.python@jensdiemer.de:
--
nosy: +jens
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21417
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 8f4e738cb07f by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24495, #24400: Test asyncio.Task.repr in debug mode
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f4e738cb07f
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 8f4e738cb07f by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24495, #24400: Test asyncio.Task.repr in debug mode
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f4e738cb07f
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker
We’re pleased to announce a new venture at this year’s EuroPython...
*** The EuroPython Beginner’s Day ***
https://ep2015.europython.eu/en/events/beginners-day/
If you’re thinking of coming to the conference but you’re new to
Python, this could be the session for you.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@europython.eu wrote:
* A high-level introduction to Python and programming in general.
Where did Python come from, what is programming all about, and what
do I need to know to understand all these in-jokes about cheese
shops?
* A
Jens Diemer added the comment:
IMHO it should be possible to set compression level not only for DEFLATE.
And it should be similar with the tarfile API.
Seems that http://bugs.python.org/issue21417 will cover this.
--
nosy: +jens
___
Python tracker
Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39799/tulip_coro.png
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24439
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset f4b702672beb by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.4':
asyncio: Merge changes from issue #24400.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f4b702672beb
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from R. David Murray:
ctags directly supports python. Is there any reason to keep the ptags and
eptags scripts in Tools/scripts?
--
messages: 245744
nosy: r.david.murray
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Shoudl ptags and eptags be removed from repo?
Meador Inge added the comment:
What is the exact GCC revision and what are the error messages? I just tried
GCC 4.9.3 and GCC 4.10.0 and don't see the errors.
Also, what configure and make parameters did you use to trigger the error?
I did './configure --with-pydebug' and './configure' with
Jacek Kołodziej added the comment:
Nice work with the check__all__() function.
Thank you! :)
I left some comments on Reitveld. Also, it currently ignores items satisfying
either of these checks:
* isinstance(module_object, types.ModuleType)
* getattr(module_object, '__module__', None)
Josh Rosenberg added the comment:
Obvious possibility: input.csv is empty, so the loop never executes. You could
always add prints within the loop as well, so you know it actually read
something.
--
nosy: +josh.r
___
Python tracker
On 06/24/2015 04:24 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
OK. But if the recipient (the server) mangles the data and then never
unmangles or reads the data, there doesn't seem to be any point in
storing it. I must be misunderstanding your statement that the data
is never read/unmangled.
When the
Martin Panter added the comment:
I tend to think that this proposal should be rejected. If you need low-level
control over the header fields, just use putrequest(), putheader() and
endheaders() methods instead. And adding these flags to request() isn’t going
to help with urlopen(), unless the
Changes by Jacek Kołodziej kolodzi...@gmail.com:
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file39807/Issue23883_support_check__all__.v3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23883
___
Jim Zajkowski added the comment:
Among the problems this causes, we can't correctly track which version is
present on our Macs (~6,000 systems) for upgrading.
--Jim
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24502
Changes by Jacek Kołodziej kolodzi...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39808/Issue23883_test_gettext.v2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23883
___
Martin Panter added the comment:
It’s working properly for me in 2.7.10:
$ cat -A input.csv
a,b,c$
1,2,3$
$ python2 testcase.py
$ cat -A output.csv
d,a,t,a^M$
d,a,t,a^M$
m,o,r,e, ,d,a,t,a^M$
--
nosy: +vadmium
stage: - test needed
___
Python tracker
Hi,
I read a blog written by Ned and find it is very interesting, but I am still
unclear it in some parts. In the following example, I am almost lost at the
last line:
nums = num
Could anyone explain it in a more detail to me?
Thanks,
...
The reason is that list
Karl Richter added the comment:
It's a fatal warning of `gcc 4.9.2`, not an error (my bad) for `int i;` in
`Parser/pgen.c` line 227. It might be ignored as well, but I think my approach
is more elegant and deals with issues sooner than later.
--
Martin Panter added the comment:
Hi Yury. It looks like you missed my updated /Doc/library/tulip_coro.dia file.
Here it is separately, in case you are having trouble extracting it from the
patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39810/tulip_coro.dia
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:52 AM, fl rxjw...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason is that list implements __iadd__ like this (except in C, not
Python):
class List:
def __iadd__(self, other):
self.extend(other)
return self
When you execute nums += more, you're getting the same
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:52 am, fl wrote:
Thanks, Steven. I don't know how to copy command console window contents
to the forum post.
I don't know either, because I don't use Windows, but you can google for
instructions:
https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=copy+text+windows+console
Josh Rosenberg added the comment:
Shouldn't it also disable the relevant fixers for map, filter, zip, etc. as
appropriate? Otherwise a whole bunch of calls will be wrapper in list() or the
like to mimic a behavior the code never had in Py2 in the first place.
--
nosy: +josh.r
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset eb6fb8e2f995 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24325, #24400: Add more unittests for types.coroutine; tweak wrapper
implementation.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eb6fb8e2f995
New changeset 7a2a79362bbe by Yury Selivanov in branch
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset eb6fb8e2f995 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24325, #24400: Add more unittests for types.coroutine; tweak wrapper
implementation.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eb6fb8e2f995
New changeset 7a2a79362bbe by Yury Selivanov in branch
New submission from Zach “The Quantum Mechanic” W:
A minor visual bug that causes text to pile up in the installer window.
Installation finished, python seems to run fine.
Operating System: Windows 8.1 64x
Installer: Python 3.5.0b2
--
components: Installation
files:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Emile van Sebille em...@fenx.com wrote:
On 6/24/2015 7:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
And how does writing unmangled data to disk expose anybody to
anything? I've never heard of an exploit where writing an evilly
crafted bit-pattern to disk causes a any sort of
Jorge Herskovic added the comment:
Ok, sorry, one more important thing I omitted in the previous comment.
^^^ The second exception above seems to be related to a new test I added, one
that includes a daemonic process which itself relies on daemonic threads.
The cleanup of that seems to be
R. David Murray added the comment:
I presume this is because openhook could be anything, including something where
the inplace code couldn't even find the file to rename. On the other hand,
Python is a consenting adults language, so we can assume you know what you
are doing if you specify
On 2015-06-24, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:02 am, Randall Smith wrote:
Chunks of data (about 2MB) are to be stored on machines using a
peer-to-peer protocol. The recipient of these chunks can't assume that
the payload is benign. While the data senders
Stefan Krah added the comment:
I think it's also possible to misconfigure /etc/nsswitch.conf.
When I opened this issue, my buildbot had the FreeBSD default
configuration. I no longer have any FreeBSD machines, so I
cannot check this now.
--
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset e31aad001fdb by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24439: Improve PEP 492 related docs.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e31aad001fdb
New changeset d99770da3b2a by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default':
Merge 3.5 (issue #24439)
Jens Diemer added the comment:
btw. hacked work-a-round is:
zlib.Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION = 9
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21417
___
Yury Selivanov added the comment:
I would prefer do not repeat the code, but I afraid this can affect the
performance, and the performance of PyDict_GetItem is critical for Python.
Static function calls like that one will most likely be inlined by the
compiler... But if you don't want to
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
But if you don't want to rely on that, maybe we can use a macro
to avoid code duplication?
This will not make the code cleaner.
In any case this is other issue.
--
title: Avoid repeated hash calculation in C implementation of
Matthieu Gautier added the comment:
A little ping.
With a new patch integrating the unit test.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39800/ctypes_swap_uint_unittest.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
On 6/24/2015 7:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
And how does writing unmangled data to disk expose anybody to
anything? I've never heard of an exploit where writing an evilly
crafted bit-pattern to disk causes a any sort of problem.
Unless that code is executed at boot. Mangling would at least
New submission from Rusi:
While trying to freshly setup a CPython repo, encountered the following
CRLF issues:
Mixed file -- both LF and CRLF (line 29 LF rest CRLF)
Lib/venv/scripts/nt/Activate.ps1
Lib/test/decimaltestdata is a directory with mixed up files -- ie some CRLF
some LF files
Steve Dower added the comment:
Feel free to fix up msi.py as much as it needs. I don't particularly understand
it - I just run it :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24508
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
+1 to what Raymond says here. Concerns regarding code duplication need to be
weighed against the likelihood of that code changing in the future, and the
impact on the readability of each copy of the code in isolation.
In this particular case, I think the
R. David Murray added the comment:
Could you please submit your proposal as a patch? (A diff -u against the
existing version).
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24505
Kevin Shweh added the comment:
It looks like the fast paths for INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_SUBTRACT in Python 2
don't have the cast-to-unsigned fix, so they're still relying on undefined
behavior. For example, in INPLACE_ADD:
/* INLINE: int + int */
register long
Zachary Ware added the comment:
Do you plan to use the old project files or the new? For the new, there should
be no change in Tools/msi, which would make fixing it very easy for me ;)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin Panter added the comment:
I think names should be in __all__ even if they shadow builtins, at least in a
new feature release. There is plenty of precedent, e.g. asyncio.TimeoutError;
reprlib.repr(); threading.enumerate(). Modules with open() in __all__ include
aifc, bz2, codecs, dbm,
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9aee273bf8b7 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24400, #24325: More tests for types._GeneratorWrapper
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9aee273bf8b7
New changeset fa097a336079 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default':
Merge 3.5 (issue #24325
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9aee273bf8b7 by Yury Selivanov in branch '3.5':
Issue #24400, #24325: More tests for types._GeneratorWrapper
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9aee273bf8b7
New changeset fa097a336079 by Yury Selivanov in branch 'default':
Merge 3.5 (issue #24325
Changes by Pete Lancashire p...@petelancashire.com:
--
components: Build
nosy: petepdx
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: configure does not find (n)curses in /usr/local/libs
type: compile error
versions: Python 2.7
___
Python
On 2015-06-24, Emile van Sebille em...@fenx.com wrote:
On 6/24/2015 7:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
And how does writing unmangled data to disk expose anybody to
anything? I've never heard of an exploit where writing an evilly
crafted bit-pattern to disk causes a any sort of problem.
Unless
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2015-06-24, Emile van Sebille em...@fenx.com wrote:
Mangling would at least prevent it from executing.
If you don't want a file to be executed, then don't make it
executable. Or doesn't Windows have any way to
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
