Rick Johnson writes:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 1:44:25 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
>> No, it's simply that nobody can force volunteers to back
>> port something when they're just not interested in doing
>> the work, for whatever reason. Hence my statement above,
>> of which you have
On 07/19/2015 11:33 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> For the most part,
> it's been good to hear from Cecil (there have been a few snarky posts)
> as he has learned python and really run with it. I don't understand
> where your apparent frustration with Cecil is coming from.
Come to think of it, I ca
Mark Lawrence writes:
> On 19/07/2015 18:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> ...
>> You think so? I think that a lot of people who are using 2.7 would
>> like to have the fixes. They know how to use Python, but they would
>> not now how to implem
Rick Johnson writes:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:54:34 AM UTC-5, dieter wrote:
>> From my point of view: if you want help with fixing bugs,
>> you must ensure that there is a high probability that
>> those contributions really find their way into the main
>> development lines. As I understan
On 7/19/2015 9:20 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
Search your logs for https://bugs.python.org/issue17094
http://bugs.python.org/issue5315
I was most frustrated by the first case --
> the patch was (informally) rejected
By 'the patch', I presume you mean current-frames-cleanup.patch
by Stefan Rin
Ian Kelly writes:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of c
Mark Lawrence writes:
> On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> ...
>> Babies want clean diapers. So babies have to change diapers
>> themselves?
>>
>
> That has to be the worst analogy I've ever read. We are discussing
> backportin
On Monday 20 July 2015 13:30, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
>>> to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-p
On 07/19/2015 06:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 20/07/2015 00:23, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> No use replying anymore. You make a caricature of what I am saying and
>> put words in my mouth I never said. Just stay in your cosy ivory
>> tower. But please do not pretend that you are open for discussi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> def main():
>>> name= input('Enter your full name: ')
>>> split=name.split()
>>> Full_name=split[2],split[
On 07/19/2015 06:21 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
>> def main():
>> name= input('Enter your full name: ')
>> split=name.split()
>> Full_name=split[2],split[0], split[1]
>> print(Full_name[2],',', Full_name[0], Full
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Kevin Peterson wrote:
> How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
You could use your favourite search engine to look this up. Or you
could poke around with the Python standard library and see if anything
looks promising:
https
Hi,
How we can send mail with attachment in Python? Is it any prerequisite for it?
Thanks,
Kevin Peterson
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> It's very interesting that you ignore the two hardest parts of the process:
> (1) Producing the patch in the first place.
> (2) Convincing those with appropriate commit rights to accept the patch.
2 is often harder than 1. Or consider the case when you report an
obvious
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:20 am, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> I was most frustrated by the first case -- the patch was (informally)
>> rejected in favor of the "right" fix, and the "right" fix was
>> (informally) rejected because it changed beha
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ryguy7272 wrote:
> Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
> C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
>
> Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
> 'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
> "C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2>" "pip install 's
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>> I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
>> to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting
>> as well! You're a zero.
>
> Rick, what the h
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 11:05:46 PM UTC-4, ryguy7272 wrote:
> Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
> C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
>
> Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
> 'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
> "C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2>" "
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:35 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
> I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting
> to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting
> as well! You're a zero.
Rick, what the hell are you talking about? Mark is using the same email
address as
Hello experts. I odwnloaded Pandas, and put it here.
C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2
Then, I ran this in what most people call the c-prompt, but I call it the
'Python 3.4.3 Shell'
"C:\Python34\Scripts\pandas-0.16.2>" "pip install 'setup.py'"
It seems like everything ran fine, so I try this.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:20 am, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>> It gets really boring submitting 2.7-specific patches, though, when
>>> they aren't accepted, and the committers have such a hostile attitude
>>> towards it. I was told by core de
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 6:19:58 AM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote:
> But don't worry, his bark is worse than his bite, and he is
> just the first of many daemons you must defeat on your quest
> to challenge the benevolent Hades.
Do you give lessons in rhetoric Rick?
--
https://mail.python.org/m
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> I just ran the following command
> $ hg log --template "{author|person}\n" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
>
> as giving all the committers to python in sorted order.
> I get the list below.
> Dont see any Mark Lawrence there
> Of course I dont kn
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:51 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> You are now suggesting that people shouldn't even bother reading the
> develoment guide, just great. Do they have to do anything themselves to
> get patches through? Presumably the core devs give up their paid work,
> holidays, families, other
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:21 am, breamore...@gmail.com wrote:
> All in all though I have to admit that overall it's a really onerous task.
> Once you've produced the patch you have to go to all the trouble of
> logging on to the issue tracker, finding the appropriate issue and
> uploading the patch.
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 03:25 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
>> And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
>> is still in Europe.
>
> This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
> be a part of the EU.
La
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:01 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof
> wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> to 2.7, surely bug fixes ar
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:16:50 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 20/07/2015 02:20, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't like how this is being redirected to "surely you
> > misunderstood" or "I don't believe you". The fact that some core devs
> > are hostile to 2.x development is re
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 4:43:57 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/19/2015 3:32 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > Unix bc:
> > $ bc
> > bc 1.06.95
> > Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation,
> > Inc.
> > This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
> >
On 20/07/2015 02:20, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
I don't like how this is being redirected to "surely you
misunderstood" or "I don't believe you". The fact that some core devs
are hostile to 2.x development is really bleedingly obvious, you
shouldn't need quotes or context thrown at you. The rhetor
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:26:52 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:49:58 AM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > Every time i defeat [MARK LAWRENCE], and drag him out
> > through an opening in the
On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:49:58 AM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Thank goodness for that as you make no sense at all. As
> > for this ivory tower nonsense, [...]
>
> Cecil, don't pay too much attention to Mark, he's a glo
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:45:43 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have no negative perception of 2.7, it simply no longer
> interests me, to repeat in the same way that it no longer
> interests some core devs.
Your apathy towards Py2 will not shield you from the
collateral damage caused
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> It gets really boring submitting 2.7-specific patches, though, when
>> they aren't accepted, and the committers have such a hostile attitude
>> towards it. I was told by core devs that, instead of fixing bugs in
>> Python 2, I should just
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Thank goodness for that as you make no sense at all. As
> for this ivory tower nonsense, [...]
Cecil, don't pay too much attention to Mark, he's a glory
hound. He's like the Python community version of Cerberus --
you know, the
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 10:27:58 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:36:21 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Wrong, not all programmers need the patches as a lot of
> > people couldn't care two hoots about 2.7.
>
> Well you should. Because apparently, you're i
On 20/07/2015 00:23, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Monday 20 Jul 2015 00:51 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 23:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 22:28 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 21:05, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 6:07:14 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
> def main():
> name= input('Enter your full name: ')
> split=name.split()
> Full_name=split[2],split[0], split[1]
> print(Full_name[2],',', Full_name[0], Full_name[1])
>
> main()
Sorry, but this code is
On 07/19/2015 05:06 PM, craig.si...@gmail.com wrote:
> def main(): name= input('Enter your full name: ')
> split=name.split()
> Full_name=split[2],split[0], split[1]
> print(Full_name[2],',', Full_name[0], Full_name[1])
>
> main()
>
> Sorry it took so long to get back to you guys an
On Monday 20 Jul 2015 00:51 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 23:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 22:28 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 21:05, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015
On Monday 20 Jul 2015 00:40 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>> If two modules import the same module, they get two references to
>>> that same module, not two separate module instances. Since your
>>> parameters appear only to affect the init
On 7/19/2015 3:32 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Unix bc:
$ bc
bc 1.06.95
Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
For details type `warranty'.
4+5
9
obase=8
4+5
11
IOW bc has two (global) variables ibase and oba
On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-5, craig...@gmail.com wrote:
> I need help writing a homework program.
>
> I'll write it, but I can't figure out how to incorporate what I have read in
> the book to work in code.
>
> The assignment wants us to take a users first, middle and last nam
On 7/19/2015 1:53 AM, dieter wrote:
Mark Lawrence writes:
...
If the vast majority of Python programmers are focused on 2.7, why are
volunteers to help fix 2.7 bugs so scarce?
I have not done much work related to Python bug fixing. But, I had
bad experience with other open source projects: m
On 19/07/2015 23:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 22:28 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 21:05, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> If two modules import the same module, they get two references to
>> that same module, not two separate module instances. Since your
>> parameters appear only to affect the initialization itself, this is
>> not likely to be a problem (it's
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 22:28 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 21:05, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/0
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 23:08 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>> I think it's fine, then. As long as it makes absolutely no sense
>>> to have two separately-initialized twitter connections, and as
>>> long as it's okay for two separate modules
On 7/18/2015 10:48 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
I understand the general problem quite well. But feeling that one would
have to do a 2.7 backport after writing, editing, or reviewing a 3.x patch
can discourage doing a review in the first place. I
On 2015-07-19 22:16, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Tim Chase
wrote:
On 2015-07-20 04:07, Chris Angelico wrote:
The int() and float() functions accept, if I'm not mistaken,
anything with Unicode category "Nd" (Number, decimal digit). In
your examples, the fraction (U+21
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:36:21 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> Wrong, not all programmers need the patches as a lot of
> people couldn't care two hoots about 2.7.
Well you should. Because apparently, you're incapable of
recognizing that Py2 and Py3 are existentially joined at the
hip!
On 7/19/2015 5:27 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:36:33 -0400, Terry Reedy writes:
If the vast majority of Python programmers are focused on 2.7, why are
volunteers to help fix 2.7 bugs so scarce?
Because volunteers to fix any bugs are scarce? Because most peopl
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Tim Chase
wrote:
> On 2015-07-20 04:07, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The int() and float() functions accept, if I'm not mistaken,
>> anything with Unicode category "Nd" (Number, decimal digit). In
>> your examples, the fraction (U+215B) is No, and the Roman numerals
>>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I think it's fine, then. As long as it makes absolutely no sense to
>> have two separately-initialized twitter connections, and as long as
>> it's okay for two separate modules to both import this and to then
>> share state, then what you
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:29:06 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 2:02:12 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
> > Poor analogy. Babies need others to change their diapers
> > for them because they're not capable of doing it for
> > themselves.
>
> Duh! That was the point of his anal
On 19/07/2015 21:05, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrot
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:13:50 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 1:44:25 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> > No, it's simply that nobody can force volunteers to back
> > port something when they're just not interested in doing
> > the work, for whatever reason. H
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 21:01 CEST, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> to 2.7, surely bug fixes
On 2015-07-20 04:07, Chris Angelico wrote:
> The int() and float() functions accept, if I'm not mistaken,
> anything with Unicode category "Nd" (Number, decimal digit). In
> your examples, the fraction (U+215B) is No, and the Roman numerals
> (U+2168, U+2182) are Nl, so they're not supported. Addin
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:19:01 AM UTC-5, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> 14324
> 234545
> 345
> 534543
>
> ^ Looks less good though in non-fixed-sized font.
The obvious solution is to use a fixed width font. If you're
inserting syntactical noise simply to maintain readability
in variable widt
On 7/18/2015 10:33 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 8:27 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 00:36, Terry Reedy wrote:
Programmers don't much like doing maintainance work when they're paid to
do it, so why would they volunteer to d
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 2:02:12 PM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
> Poor analogy. Babies need others to change their diapers
> for them because they're not capable of doing it for
> themselves.
Duh! That was the point of his analogy, Ian. *ALL* Python
programmers need the patches. Whether or not they posse
On 2015-07-19 20:01, Aron Barsam wrote:
i have trouble trying to play python please can you respond soon
You'll need to provide some details. Saying "i have trouble" isn't helpful.
Help us to help you.
Which operating system are you using? Windows, MacOS, Linux? Which
version?
Which version
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 20:11 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Parameterized imports aren't possible, correct. What I'd look at
>>> here is a more explicit instantiation. Something like:
>>>
>>> import twitterDecebal
>>> twitter = twitterDecebal.twitterDecebal(5, 60)
>>
>> I worked with default value
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 1:44:25 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, it's simply that nobody can force volunteers to back
> port something when they're just not interested in doing
> the work, for whatever reason. Hence my statement above,
> of which you have focused on the last eight wor
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Aron Barsam wrote:
> i have trouble trying to play python please can you respond soon
"Play" is an odd choice of verb. Are you under the impression that
Python is a game? Anyway, here's how to use Python:
1. Download Python from python.org.
2. Install Python on y
i have trouble trying to play python please can you respond soon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>> On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
>>>
>>> Of course, allowed. But should t
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:15 PM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:55:06 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > I don't think so, I know. If they want the patches that
> > badly and can't do it themselves they'll have to grin and
> > bear it, or do a bit of begging, or
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:55:06 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> I don't think so, I know. If they want the patches that
> badly and can't do it themselves they'll have to grin and
> bear it, or do a bit of begging, or pay somebody to do it
> for them.
It's all about the effing money then?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
>>I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
>>patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
>>environment that it runs in? Are you
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:29:11 -0600, Ian Kelly writes:
>I think this is an unrealistic and unattainable goal. Even if you stop
>patching your Python 2.7 version altogether, what about the
>environment that it runs in? Are you going to stop patching the OS
>forever? Are you going to fix
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 14:59 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Reordering/interleaving your post to respond to different parts
>> together.
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>> I am using libturpial to post thing
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:35:03 +0100, MRAB wrote:
> rsplit -> one line.
def lastWordFirst(s):
return " ".join(reversed(s.rsplit(" ", 1)))
--
Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Tim Chase
wrote:
> Agreed that it's pretty awesome. It seems to have some holes though:
>
> Python 3.4.2 (default, Oct 8 2014, 10:45:20)
> [GCC 4.9.1] on linux
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
print('\N{VULGAR FRACTIO
On 19/07/2015 18:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:25:35 -0700, Rick Johnson writes:
>On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
>> And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
>> is still in Europe.
>
>This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
>be a part
On 2015-07-19 18:25, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
is still in Europe.
This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
be a part of the EU. Not anymore than i would
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 18:38 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also a
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 4:18:31 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
> And, despite Norway not being part of the EU, Scandinavia
> is still in Europe.
This is a bit off topic: But i don't consider Scandinavia to
be a part of the EU. Not anymore than i would consider
America to be a part of the EU
On 2015-07-19 14:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> ie we can now do
> १ + २
>> 3
>
> That is actually quite awesome, and I would support a new feature
> that set the numeric characters to a particular script, e.g. Latin,
> Arabic, Devanagari, whatever, and printed them in that same script.
> I
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 14:59 CEST, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Reordering/interleaving your post to respond to different parts
> together.
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> I am using libturpial to post things on Twitter. But sometimes I
>> get a ServiceOverCapacity except
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 12:54:34 AM UTC-5, dieter wrote:
> From my point of view: if you want help with fixing bugs,
> you must ensure that there is a high probability that
> those contributions really find their way into the main
> development lines. As I understand from other messages in
> th
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 17:24, MRAB wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-07-19 17:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
>>> wrote:
I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that
was t
On 19/07/2015 17:24, MRAB wrote:
On 2015-07-19 17:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that
was the
Amiga file system.
Okay, I'll bite. What does HHMLL stand for? Google didn't answ
On 19/07/2015 17:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
Of course, allowed. But should they be made, and if so, by who
On 2015-07-19 01:59, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:35:10 +0200, Sibylle Koczian wrote:
Am 18.07.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Denis McMahon:
Having a list of words, get a copy of the list in reverse order. See
the reversed function (and maybe the list function).
That won't really he
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:24 AM, MRAB wrote:
> On 2015-07-19 17:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that was
>>> the
>>> Amiga file system.
>>
>>
>> Okay, I'll bite. Wh
On 2015-07-19 17:13, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that was the
Amiga file system.
Okay, I'll bite. What does HHMLL stand for? Google didn't answer my
question instantly with the
On Sunday 19 Jul 2015 15:42 CEST, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/07/2015 03:13, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 7/18/2015 7:50 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>>> to 2.7, surely bug fixes are also allowed?
>>
>> Of course, allowed. But should they be made, and if so, by who?
>
> The people who want the fixes.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> I've only seen one other application using HHMLL -- and that was the
> Amiga file system.
Okay, I'll bite. What does HHMLL stand for? Google didn't answer my
question instantly with the first result, like it usually does. I even
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In this corner of the world, the favourite language for developing in
> is C (because we work close to hardware) and one of the things we like
> about it, a whole lot, is that the language never changes out from
> under you. So there is gr
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 2:42:41 PM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/18/2015 11:52 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> among other things, a complaint about rejection of his desire for a
> mechanism for subsetting Python for teaching purposes.
Sorry Terry if the compliant sounded louder than the answe
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:59:29 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>Bug for bug compatible back to the 1970s, right? :-)
No, till the last posix in 1989 or so. Definitely not to the 1970s
as we want v7 c structs and x++ not the v6 ++x version.
:)
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailm
In a message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:59:29 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 07:27 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
>
>> In the tiny corner of industrial automation where I do a lot of work,
>> nobody is using 3.0.
>
>I should hope not, because 3.0 was rubbish and is unsupported :-)
>
On 19/07/2015 06:53, dieter wrote:
Mark Lawrence writes:
...
If the vast majority of Python programmers are focused on 2.7, why are
volunteers to help fix 2.7 bugs so scarce?
I have not done much work related to Python bug fixing. But, I had
bad experience with other open source projects: ma
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 07:27 pm, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In the tiny corner of industrial automation where I do a lot of work,
> nobody is using 3.0.
I should hope not, because 3.0 was rubbish and is unsupported :-)
I expect you mean 3.x in general.
> It is not clear that this is ever going to c
On 19/07/2015 04:52, Rustom Mody wrote:
Not to mention actively hostile attitude to discussions that could at the
moment be tangential to current CPython. See (and whole thread)
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-May/033708.html
This https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-i
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:11 pm, Lara BK wrote:
> I would like to do a spatial join in a batch process in python.
You seem to be using arcpy. Unfortunately, that's not a standard part of
Python, so I don't know it very well. But looking at the error you get:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
On 19/07/2015 04:45, Paul Rubin wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
I am suggesting that if there are 10x as many 2.7only programmers as
3.xonly programmers, and none of the 2.7 programmers is willing to do
the backport *of an already accepted patch*, then maybe it should not
be done at all.
The patch
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
