Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Steve D'Aprano
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 03:12 pm, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > I can't believe how many typos and grammar errors there are in this > thread by people correcting typos and grammar. That's practically a law of physics: the Iron Law of Nitpicking, better known as Muphry's Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Rustom Mody
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 7:55:57 AM UTC+5:30, Sandeep Nagar wrote: > Hi, > > A few month ago I wrote a book on introductory python based on my experinces > while teaching python to Bachelor students of engineering. It is now > available in e-book and paperback format at Amazon. > > htt

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread D'Arcy Cain
On 2017-01-27 11:01 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: This is a run-on sentence, which is to say, two sentences. Change 'suntax,' to 'syntax.' and 'in' to ' In'. ^^ I can't believe how many typos and grammar errors there are in this thread by people correcting typos and grammar. And please don't

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Terry Reedy
On 1/27/2017 6:12 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: On Jan 27, 2017 2:13 PM, "bob gailer" wrote: On 1/26/2017 8:05 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: Hi As I mentioned, a scaled down version is available for free at bookmuft.Com which can be used to judge in this case. Maybe I am blind, but I don't see any menti

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Ethan Furman
On 01/27/2017 03:11 PM, Erik wrote: On 27/01/17 21:36, MRAB wrote: "loose"? Don't you mean "lose"? (Or possible "lack"?) Don't you mean 'Or possibly "lack"'? And this is why books should be reviewed and edited /before publishing/. ;) -- ~Ethan~ -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Ian Kelly
On Jan 27, 2017 2:13 PM, "bob gailer" wrote: On 1/26/2017 8:05 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: > Hi > > As I mentioned, a scaled down version is available for free at > bookmuft.Com which can be used to judge in this case. > Maybe I am blind, but I don't see any mention of bookmuft.Co. I pulled up th

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Erik
On 27/01/17 21:36, MRAB wrote: "loose"? Don't you mean "lose"? (Or possible "lack"?) Don't you mean 'Or possibly "lack"'? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law ;) E. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Ray Cote
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:18 PM, mm0fmf wrote: > On 27/01/2017 20:17, bob gailer wrote: > >> On 1/25/2017 9:25 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> A few month ago I wrote a book on introductory python based on my >>> experinces while teaching python to Bachelor students of engineering. >>

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread MRAB
On 2017-01-27 21:18, mm0fmf wrote: On 27/01/2017 20:17, bob gailer wrote: On 1/25/2017 9:25 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: Hi, A few month ago I wrote a book on introductory python based on my experinces while teaching python to Bachelor students of engineering. It is now available in e-book and pap

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread mm0fmf
On 27/01/2017 20:17, bob gailer wrote: On 1/25/2017 9:25 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: Hi, A few month ago I wrote a book on introductory python based on my experinces while teaching python to Bachelor students of engineering. It is now available in e-book and paperback format at Amazon. https://ww

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread Jon Ribbens
On 2017-01-27, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > On 2017-01-27 03:17 PM, bob gailer wrote: >> sudo apt-get won't work on Windows. Tell the reader that this is how to >> do it in Unix, and show the Windows equivalent. > > Actually it doesn't work on Unix either. It only works on Linux. Actually it doesn't wor

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread D'Arcy Cain
On 2017-01-27 03:17 PM, bob gailer wrote: sudo apt-get won't work on Windows. Tell the reader that this is how to do it in Unix, and show the Windows equivalent. Actually it doesn't work on Unix either. It only works on Linux. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain System Administrator, Vex.Net http://www.Vex.N

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread bob gailer
On 1/25/2017 9:25 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: Hi, A few month ago I wrote a book on introductory python based on my experinces while teaching python to Bachelor students of engineering. It is now available in e-book and paperback format at Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1520153686 The book i

Re: Need reviews for my book on introductory python

2017-01-27 Thread bob gailer
On 1/26/2017 8:05 PM, Sandeep Nagar wrote: Hi As I mentioned, a scaled down version is available for free at bookmuft.Com which can be used to judge in this case. Maybe I am blind, but I don't see any mention of bookmuft.Co. Regards On Jan 27, 2017 05:02, "bob gailer"

Re: How coding in Python is bad for you

2017-01-27 Thread Nathan Ernst
I used to manually reformat unfamiliar C++ by hand, if for no other reason in that it forced me to read the code and somewhat comprehend what was going on. Now, I've lost my patience and use clang-format, a great & highly configurable tool. I also use vim for Python & C++ coding, so I also rely upo

Re: Referencing section name by interpolation in ConfigParser

2017-01-27 Thread Hans-Peter Jansen
On Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2017 10:01:56 Peter Otten wrote: > Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > I would like to use a interpolated section name, e.g.: > > > > [Section] > > secref: %{section}s/whatever > > > > should result in: > config['Section']['secref'] > > > > 'Section/whatever' > > > > Any i

Re: How coding in Python is bad for you

2017-01-27 Thread Cecil Westerhof
On Friday 27 Jan 2017 05:07 CET, Brandon McCaig wrote: > Hell, considering the code that I have seen in the wild it might > even catch some extra errors that become syntax errors! It's not > at all rare for indentation to not match in languages that don't > require it to at least fit a pattern. I