The comp.lang.python.announce newsgroup (or c.l.py.a for short) has been
created in early 1998 as a companion newsgroup for comp.lang.python focused on
Python-related announcements. ... other items of general interest to the Python
community.
https://www.gangboard.com/big-data-training/data-scie
On 11Feb2019 08:17, Irv Kalb wrote:
On Feb 11, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
I have code with structure:
```
if cond1:
[some code]
if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
[ more code]
else:
[ do xxyy ]
else:
[ do the same xxyy as above ]
```
So what's the best
The error I get typing pip install -U tensorflow into the command terminal
Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement tensorflow (from
versions: )
No matching distribution found for tensorflow.
Ive been able to install numpy, scipy, and pygame. Tensorflow is the only
package tha
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:13 AM Avi Gross wrote:
>
>
> Just Chris,
Can we keep things on the list please?
> I am thinking I missed the point of this discussion thus what I say makes no
> sense.
Not sure. You were fairly specific with your statements about how
things supposedly were in the past.
The first one is used very often. Less verbose
Le 11 févr. 2019 à 20:41, à 20:41, Felix Lazaro Carbonell
a écrit:
>
>
>Hello to everyone:
>
>Could you please tell me wich way of writing this method is more
>pythonic:
>
>
>
>..
>
>def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
>
>
On 11/02/2019 19:30, Chris Narkiewicz via Python-list wrote:
> Is there any extra step I have to take?
Ok, I'll respond to myself, as this was really silly.
Debian ships hopelessly obsolete pip 9.PEP 518 is supported in pip 10+.
Cheers,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:56 PM boB Stepp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:34 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > Calling on the D'Aprano Collection of Ancient Pythons for confirmation
> > here, but I strongly suspect that positional arguments with defaults
> > go back all the way to 1.x.
>
> Has
Felix Lazaro Carbonell wrote:
> Hello to everyone:
> Could you please tell me wich way of writing this method is more pythonic:
> def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
>
> month = month or datetime.date.today()
> Or it should better be:
> if not month:
>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:34 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> Calling on the D'Aprano Collection of Ancient Pythons for confirmation
> here, but I strongly suspect that positional arguments with defaults
> go back all the way to 1.x.
Has Steve's banishment ended yet? The only postings I have recently
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:26 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> > If you want to talk about recent or planned changes, fine. But make that
> > clear. I was talking about how in the past positional arguments did not have
> > defaults available at the de
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-02-11, Felix Lazaro Carbonell wrote:
>
>> Could you please tell me wich way of writing this method is more
>> pythonic:
>>
>> def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
>> month = month or datetime.date.today()
>>
>> Or it should better be:
>>
>>
+1 with David Raymond, it's nice to use condensed style when it leaves
things readable and logic. But if in doubt:
"Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is better than complex." :)
-Sivan
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:19 PM David Raymond
wrote:
> My non-expert vote is for
>
> if month is None
On 2/11/2019 2:46 PM, Felix Lazaro Carbonell wrote:
def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
month = month or datetime.date.today().month
Or it should better be:
if not month:
month = datetime.date.today().month
As a 20+ year veteran, I would be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:26 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> If you want to talk about recent or planned changes, fine. But make that
> clear. I was talking about how in the past positional arguments did not have
> defaults available at the def statement level. I was talking about how use
> of the symbol "=
Ian,
Again, not having read whatever documentation we may be discussing, I may be
very wrong.
The topic is the C API. I started using C at Bell Laboratories in 1982
replacing other languages I had used before. I haven't felt a reason to use
it in the last few decades as I moved on to yet other la
Ian,
I now assume we are no longer talking about the past or even the present but
some planned future. In that future we are talking about how to define a
function with added or changed functionality. So nothing I wrote earlier
really applies because I was talking of how things did work in the abs
Ian,
I want to make sure we are talking about the same things in the same ways. I
will thus limit my comments in this message.
If efficiency is your major consideration, then using only positional
arguments of known types you can place on the stack and optimize at compile
time may be a great way
My non-expert vote is for
if month is None:
month = datetime.date.today().month
Because you're checking for your default value, not whether the boolean version
of what they did give you is True or False. It's explicit, it's not reliant on
any __bool__() function implementations or overrides
-Mensaje original-
De: Python-list [mailto:python-list-bounces+felix=epepm.cupet...@python.org]
En nombre de Grant Edwards
Enviado el: lunes, 11 de febrero de 2019 02:46 p.m.
Para: python-list@python.org
Asunto: Re: more pythonic way
On 2019-02-11, Felix Lazaro Carbonell wrote:
> Coul
Sorry I meant
..
def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
month = month or datetime.date.today().month
..
Or it should better be:
...
if not month:
month = datetime.date.today().month
..
Cheers,
Felix.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
On 2019-02-11, Felix Lazaro Carbonell wrote:
> Could you please tell me wich way of writing this method is more pythonic:
>
> def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
> month = month or datetime.date.today()
>
> Or it should better be:
>
> if not month:
>
Hello to everyone:
Could you please tell me wich way of writing this method is more pythonic:
..
def find_monthly_expenses(month=None, year=None):
month = month or datetime.date.today()
..
Or it should better be:
...
if not month:
month = datetime.d
On 11/02/2019 15:57, Ben Finney wrote:
> All of the build dependencies, *including* the ones specified in
> ‘setup_requires’?
Yes. easy_install simply doesn't look there. If I provide
~/.pydistutils.cfg with a path to find_links, it works ok.
Config file in $HOME however is no-go for a CI or buil
what python version are you using? what errors are you getting?
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm trying to replicate the YouTube video,
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NTlXEJjfsQU. The videos git hub address is,
https://github.com/carykh/alignedCelebFaces. The video says I have to download
python 3 and using pip download tensorflow, numpy, scipy, and pygame. I've
tried downloading this
On 2019-02-10 16:28:24 -0500, Avi Gross wrote:
> >> tenserflow, pygame, scipy, and numby
[...]
> please mention that the tenser flow should be tensorflow.
Eight, sir; seven, sir;
Six, sir; five, sir;
Four, sir; three, sir;
Two, sir; one!
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tension, a
> On 10 Feb 2019, at 16:43, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:37 AM Barry Scott wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, 10 February 2019 15:15:32 GMT Jon Ribbens wrote:
>>> As an aside, how is 'math.sin' actually implemented? mathmodule.c
>>> refers to the function 'math_sin' but that name
The migration was from 2.7 to 2.7 and 3.x, rather than 3.x only.
I think it worth reading for anyone interested in the subject.
https://zato.io/blog/posts/python-3-migration-success-story.html
60,000 lines of Python and Cython, 130 external dependencies (but only
10 not already 3.x ready) took 2
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:27 AM Neal Becker
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have code with structure:
>> >> ```
>> >> if cond1:
>> >> [some code]
>> >> if cond2: #where cond2 depends on t
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> I have code with structure:
> ```
> if cond1:
> [some code]
> if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
>[ more code]
>
> else:
>[ do xxyy ]
> else:
> [ do the same xxyy as above ]
> ```
>
> So what's the best sty
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:21 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:27 AM Neal Becker wrote:
> >>
> >> I have code with structure:
> >> ```
> >> if cond1:
> >> [some code]
> >> if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
> >> [ more cod
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:27 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>> I have code with structure:
>> ```
>> if cond1:
>> [some code]
>> if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
>> [ more code]
>>
>> else:
>> [ do xxyy ]
>> else:
>> [ do the same xxyy as a
On 2/11/19 9:25 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
I have code with structure:
```
if cond1:
[some code]
if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
[ more code]
else:
[ do xxyy ]
else:
[ do the same xxyy as above ]
```
So what's the best style to handle this? As coded, i
Chris Narkiewicz via Python-list writes:
> debian/rules calls this pip to install all requirements from local
> package collection:
>
> pip3 install --log=... --no-cache --no-index --find-links=pypi
> --no-binary=":all:" -r requirements.txt
As you have observed, this fails because Setuptools doe
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:27 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> I have code with structure:
> ```
> if cond1:
> [some code]
> if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
> [ more code]
>
> else:
> [ do xxyy ]
> else:
> [ do the same xxyy as above ]
> ```
>
> So what's the best s
Rhodri James wrote:
> On 11/02/2019 15:25, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I have code with structure:
>> ```
>> if cond1:
>>[some code]
>>if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
>> [ more code]
>>
>>else:
>> [ do xxyy ]
>> else:
>>[ do the same xxyy as above ]
>>
On 11/02/2019 15:25, Neal Becker wrote:
I have code with structure:
```
if cond1:
[some code]
if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
[ more code]
else:
[ do xxyy ]
else:
[ do the same xxyy as above ]
```
So what's the best style to handle this? As coded,
I have code with structure:
```
if cond1:
[some code]
if cond2: #where cond2 depends on the above [some code]
[ more code]
else:
[ do xxyy ]
else:
[ do the same xxyy as above ]
```
So what's the best style to handle this? As coded, it violates DRY.
Try/except could be used with
Kiyimba,
In my community in Arizona ( pop 7000) I am the
only one using Linux and the only one who is
studying Python, no one is coding. So spread your
knowledge among the youth of your commun ity. It is good for
their future.
Alex Kaye
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 1:34 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2
Hi,
I'm trying to build a debian package in offline environment (build server).
To build this package, I need to ship all python dependencies as source
packages and build them there. This is no problem for all, except one
package that has build-time dependencies: Automat-0.70.
debian/rules calls
On 2/11/2019 2:47 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
For math.sin, sure, but what about, say, list.index?
Special-case conversion is a different issue from blanket conversion.
Some C functions have been converted to accept some or all args by
keyword. I don't know the status of list method conversion: dis
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:51 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> > and not normally accessible to pure Python functions without
> > some arm twisting.
>
> In my first response on this thread I explained and demonstrated how to
> access signature strings from Python, as done by both help() and IDLE.
> Please r
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:49 PM Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:19 AM Terry Reedy wrote:
> > The pass-by-position limitation is not in CPython, it is the behavior of
> > C functions, which is the behavior of function calls in probably every
> > assembly and machine language. Allo
43 matches
Mail list logo
