On Sat, Jul 4, 2020, at 18:17, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 07/04/2020 10:32 AM, Random832 wrote:
>
> > I said obvious because even if it was not obvious from the commit message
> > itself, it had *already been explained* in the thread on the other mailing
> > list
>
> That would require Michael to
On 5/07/20 5:20 AM, narenchund...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to assign a widget to an excel cell. Convertion wont help me.Thanks
That's true - and false!
Unfortunately, these posts have revealed little about you and your level
of understanding of Python specifically, and computer programmi
On 07/04/2020 10:32 AM, Random832 wrote:
I said obvious because even if it was not obvious from the commit message
itself, it had *already been explained* in the thread on the other mailing list
That would require Michael to have been reading the other mailing list to know
that. Just becaus
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020, at 12:33, o1bigtenor wrote:
> I would point out that even suggesting that the issue be a *obvious
> factual mistake* only serves to prove that you didn't read the thing
> and I, at least, wonder why you're offering an opinion on any part of
> the discussion.
I said obvious
I am trying to assign a widget to an excel cell. Convertion wont help me.Thanks
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 10:41 AM Random832 wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020, at 08:48, Rhodri James wrote:
> > As I said in my preamble, it doesn't matter whether you believe that is
> > true or think it's utter bollocks. I asked the question to get the
> > Steering Council's opinion, not anyone else
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020, at 08:48, Rhodri James wrote:
> As I said in my preamble, it doesn't matter whether you believe that is
> true or think it's utter bollocks. I asked the question to get the
> Steering Council's opinion, not anyone else's. If you collectively
> really must rehash the argume
