Good or bad use of __repr__?

2009-02-03 Thread Alaric Haag
Hello, Is the use of __repr__ below a "really bad idea"? class Dimension(): def __init__(self, setp, name): ptr = setp.contents.dim while ptr.contents.name != name: ptr = ptr.contents.next self.name = ptr.contents.name self.size = ptr.contents.size

Re: Odd syntactic NON-error?

2009-01-30 Thread Alaric Haag
In article <20090130173948.12853.732928641.divmod.quotient@henry.divmod.com>, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:36:45 -0600, Alaric Haag wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I just noticed that I've been successfully importing a module I wrote >

Odd syntactic NON-error?

2009-01-30 Thread Alaric Haag
Hello, I just noticed that I've been successfully importing a module I wrote which contains a class definition that begins with (docstring removed): class TDF(): def __init__(self, name='', mode=tscan. GP_NOCLOBBER): Note the "space" which shouldn't be here---^ I'm running Python 2.5.2.

Re: A "roadmap" for ctypes wrapping?

2008-03-25 Thread Alaric Haag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alaric Haag schrieb: > > Hi all, > > > > stuff deleted > > > > == > > Can anyone with some "wrapping" experience add/modify/enha

A "roadmap" for ctypes wrapping?

2008-03-23 Thread Alaric Haag
Hi all, I'm undertaking a pretty significant wrapping project (a linux shared-object lib) early in my Python experience, and thought it might be useful for many more that just myself if this thread were to produce a sort of roadmap for approaching wrapping with ctypes. I've been doing some rea

Re: Pycon disappointment

2008-03-16 Thread Alaric Haag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Eckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the following seems unnecessarily harsh, it was even more harsh for . As a relative noob to the Python world, (and lurker to the list :) ) I can't speak to differences from previous years. However, my impressions

Re: Information on PyGMT?

2008-01-04 Thread Alaric Haag
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -On [20080104 04:11], Alaric ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >Unfortunately, the only site (forge.nesc.ac.uk) that seems to offer the code > >(written by Magnus Hagdorn) is not responding. I don't know if that