Chris Smith wrote:
> Andrew McDonagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I haven't read all of this thread, I wonder, is the problem to do with
>> Class being mistaken for Type? (which is usually the issue)
>
> Hi Andrew!
Hi Chris
>
> Not much of this thread ha
Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Chris Smith schrieb:
>> Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sorry, I have to insist that it's not me who's stretching terms here.
>>>
>>> All textbook definitions that I have seen define a type as the
>>> set/operations/axioms triple I mentioned above.
>>> N
Steve Jorgensen wrote:
> I'm posting this message for 2 reasons.
>
> First, I'm still pretty new and shakey to the whole Acceptance Testing thing,
> and I'm hoping for some feedback on whether I'm on the right track. Second,
> although all the Agile literature talks about the importance of doing
