On Aug 4, 9:10 am, BobAalsma bob.aal...@aalsmacons.nl wrote:
#
bestandsnaam_nieuw = bestandsnaam
bestandsnaam_nieuw.replace(KLANTNAAM_OUT,KLANTNAAM_IN)
The replace method does not modify the string (strings are immutable).
On Feb 10, 2:09 pm, kj no.em...@please.post wrote:
Some people have mathphobia. I'm developing a wicked case of
Unicodephobia.
[snip]
Some general advice (Looks like I am reiterating what MRAB said -- I
type slower :):
1. If possible, use unicode strings for everything. That is, don't
use
On Feb 10, 3:42 pm, joy99 subhakolkata1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Group,
[snip]
I tried to change the location to D:\file and as I saw in Python Docs
the file reading option is now r+ so I changed the statement to
file_open=open(D:\file,r+)
but it is still giving error.
Only use r+ if you
On Jan 28, 7:12 am, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
In the code:
f = open('input.txt', 'r+')
for line in f:
s = line.replace('python', 'PYTHON')
# f.tell()
f.write(s)
[snip]
My guess is that there are a few possible problems:
1) In this case, writing to file opened
On Dec 28, 7:29 am, Martin v. Loewis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
In this case (you just started to learn Python), I recommend to take
an explicit approach. Create a dictionary that maps class names to
classes:
name2class = { MyObject : MyObject,
MyOtherObject : MyOtherObject,
On Oct 21, 3:20 pm, Dan Guido dgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Diez,
The source of the string literals is ConfigParser, so I can't just
mark them with an 'r'.
config = ConfigParser.RawConfigParser()
config.read(filename)
crazyfilepath = config.get(name, ImagePath)
normalfilepath =
On Oct 16, 12:24 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
[snip]
As for what you want: No, it's not currently possible. If it's so big
a deal that the various methods presented don't meet with your approval,
break out the C and write your own. Then you could give that back to
the
On Oct 15, 7:24 am, Austin Bingham austin.bing...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip] I'd like to create a set of these
objects where the hashing is done on these names. [snip]
Why not use a dict? The key would be the object name. Pretty much
the same behavior as a set (via the key), and you can still
On Oct 15, 10:42 am, Austin Bingham austin.bing...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Anthony Tolle To reiterate, dict only gets
me part of what I want. Whereas a set
with uniqueness defined over 'obj.name' would guarantee no name
collisions, dict only sorta helps me keep
On Oct 15, 12:11 pm, Austin Bingham austin.bing...@gmail.com wrote:
To put it in code, I want this:
s = set(hash_func = lambda obj: hash(obj.name), eq_func = ...)
...
x.name = 'foo'
y.name = 'foo'
s.add(x)
s.add(y) # no-op because of uniqueness criteria
assert len(s) == 1
I
On Oct 15, 1:49 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
I'm still not sure I understand your concern about the values in a set,
though. Sets keep the first object of a given key, dicts keep the last
object of a given key; in both cases, all other objects with the same
key are lost.
So is
To take things one step further, I would recommend using decorators to
allow symbolic association of functions with the message identifiers,
as follows:
==
(MESSAGE_ONE
,MESSAGE_TWO
,MESSAGE_THREE
) = xrange(3)
class MyClass(object):
method_dict = {}
On Jul 20, 12:27 pm, Phillip B Oldham phillip.old...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Specifically the differences between lists and tuples have us
confused and have caused many discussions in the office. We
understand that lists are mutable and tuples are not, but we're a
little lost as to why the two
On Jul 15, 8:32 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Among other things, that uses quadratic time! Why do you want to keep
popping items from that list instead of iterating through it anyway?
Anyway, I think you wrote something close to this:
...
Very true! I didn't think
On Jul 14, 2:25 pm, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman pfeld...@verizon.net
wrote:
Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
have an 'xor' operator as well.
My $0.02 on this discussion: There would be nothing gained by having
non-bitwise XOR operator. You can't
On Dec 29, 1:01 am, scsoce scs...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a function return a reference, and want to assign to the
reference, simply like this:
def f(a)
return a
b = 0
* f( b ) = 1*
but the last line will be refused as can't assign to function call.
In my thought , the
On Dec 19, 9:34 am, Alex alex.pul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a Pyhon GUI application that launches subprocess.
I would like to read the subprocess' stdout as it is being produced
(show it in GUI), without hanging the GUI.
I guess threading will solve the no-hanging issue, but as far as
On Dec 6, 4:15 pm, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 6, 12:47 am, Patrick Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could I do something like this:
def a.add(b): return a+b
Outside of a class? Of course then that makes you think you could do
5.add(6) or something crzy like that.
On Dec 6, 4:15 pm, Carl Banks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 6, 12:47 am, Patrick Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could I do something like this:
def a.add(b): return a+b
Outside of a class? Of course then that makes you think you could do
5.add(6) or something crzy like that.
):
def self.func(arg):
return arg + 1
-
Anthony Tolle
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
20 matches
Mail list logo
