Xah Lee wrote:
> blah blah blah blah blah lisp blah blah blah
> blah blah lisp blah blah. Blah blah? Blah blah!
> blah blah blah blah blah;
> 1) Blah lisp.
> 2) Blah blah.
> 3) Blah lisp blah.
> blah blah blah blah blah. Blah blah lisp! Blah lisp!
> Blah lisp! Blah! Blah blah blah! Lisp bla
Bart Willems wrote:
> Autofit is a method. Also, columns are a method of a worksheet - try:
> xlApp.Worksheets.Columns("C:K").Autofit()
Silly me. That is of course xlApp.Activesheet.Columns("C:K").Autofit()
On a sidenote, you can refer to a worksheet with xlApp
Ray wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to call "xlApp.Columns.AutoFit=1" the whole program will crash,
> but without xlApp.Columns.AutoFit=1, everything just fine.
Autofit is a method. Also, columns are a method of a worksheet - try:
xlApp.Worksheets.Columns("C:K").Autofit()
(or whatever columns you need of c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Perl, there is a GD module to draw custom chart.
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-perlgdchart/?ca=dgr-lnxw01Perl-GD-Charts
> Can you please tell me if there is an equivalent library in python?
Did you take a look at reportlab? (ht
Aahz wrote:
> In all fairness, the csv module is new in Python 2.3, and I'm sure I'm
> not the only person still using Python 2.2 for production.
That is true, on the other hand, Reportlab is made for at least Python
2.4, "although it will work with 2.3" - so he has 2.3 at least :)
--
http://mail
gtb wrote:
> appear at the end of many examples I see. Is this to cause a .class
> file to be generated?
This might be obvious, but no one else mentioned it: the Python
interpreter cannot execute code that it hasn't compiled yet, which is
why the "if __name__ ..." code is always at the end of the
anders wrote:
> So basicly i like advice about interac with os, compiler etc.
> Nice webblinks to read more
> and do/don't things.
Hello Anders,
OS Support for Windows in Python is excellent. I suggest you download
the latest version, and don't forget to download Mark Hammond's win32
library as
Carsten Haese wrote:
> You mean something like the csv module that is part of Python's standard
> library?
>
import csv
help(csv)
You have to admit, the module name is not really intuitive... :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jia Lu wrote:
> I have 2 lists,
> a = [1,2,3]
> b = ["ooo","aaa","ppp"]
reading the documentation might help.
If that doesn't work, try d = dict(zip(a, b))
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2007 06:35:34 -0700, "jamadagni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed
> the following in comp.lang.python:
> In Python, the "variable" NAME does NOT define storage; unlike most
> other classical languages where the "variable name" is a storage
> address, and the
> if points > 89 and points <= 100:
> return "A"
> elif points > 89 and points <= 89:
> return "B"
> elif points > 69 and points <= 79:
> return "C"
> elif points > 59 and points <= 69:
> return "D"
> else:
> return "F"
The previous poste
James Stroud wrote:
> ... It boils down to the fact that tuples are useless as a
> result unless you know you really need them--and you never really NEED
> them.
Could you clarify that for me? I use tuples *a lot* and I really *NEED*
them - I'm building a lot of multi-tier reports where detail-
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:23:19 -0700, Chris Lasher wrote:
>
>> A friend of mine with a programming background in Java and Perl places
>> each class in its own separate file in . I informed him that keeping
>> all related classes together in a single file is more in the Pytho
John Machin wrote:
> I'm a bit puzzled by your notion of creating a dependency graph
> *without* first extracting the "relationships (functions)" [which you
> could do only by parsing the formulas and macros].
Not really. The range object in the Excel object model has a Dependents
attribute, al
>
> Even better: pick one entry of your choice from
>
> http://images.google.com/images?q=%22don%27t+feed+the+troll%22
>
>
> Michele
OMG and here I am thinking that Ken Rockwell's site is full of crap.
This one's worse... Does the guy have a job? Or a life?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
Aaah, *now* we're getting somewhere... :-)
>> All he wants is something that turns 'readable,
>> changeable python' into 'unreadable, immutable python'.
>
> chown scriptuser script.py # a unique user
> chmod a-rwx script.py
> chmod u+rx script.py
>
> I believe that fully meets the functional r
dmitrey wrote:
> 1st still is shorter by 1 char; considering majority of people use
> space after comma & number of parameters can be big it yileds
> foo bar baz bar2 bar3 bar4
> vs
> foo(bar, baz, bar2, bar3, bar4)
I think most readers already agree on the ambiguities part. Now, for the
length o
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Protect it from what? Viruses? Terrorists? The corrupt government? Your
> ex-wife cutting it up with scissors? People who want to copy it? People
> who will look at your code and laugh at you for being a bad programmer?
>
> Until you tell us what you are trying to protect
John McMonagle wrote:
> Try it a different way:
>
> while True:
> hint = raw_input("\nAre you stuck? y/n: ")
> hint = hint.lower()
> if hint != 'y' and hint != 'n':
> print "Please answer y or n"
> continue
> else:
> break
> if hint == 'y':
> do_your_hin
Donald Fredkin wrote:
> John wrote:
>
>> For my code of radix sort, I need to initialize 256 buckets. My code
>> looks a little clumsy:
>>
>> radix=[[]]
>> for i in range(255):
>>radix.append([])
>>
>> any better code to initalize this list?
>
> radix = [[[]]*256][0]
>
No I fell for that on
I'm sorry, but what's wrong with:
radix = [ [] ] * 256
Cheers,
Bart
"John" writes:
>> For my code of radix sort, I need to initialize 256 buckets. My code looks a
>> little clumsy:
>>
>> radix=[[]]
>> for i in range(255):
>> radix.append([])
>>
>> any better code to initalize this list?
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
