I am sorry if this is obvious, but I am not seeing it. How would I go
about creating a new type that is of the same type as a class sent into
the function?
new = foo.__init__() refers to the current foo, not a new fresh
instance of my class. The only way I can think of is to make a large
Yes because that is a bad way to things. There is no reason to be
working with a list when it could be done directly with numarray.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thats not what Jack Chick says =(
http://www.chick.com/catalog/tractlist.asp
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Well I would be more than willing to learn Emacs if it does all these
things you speak of, but really I can't get started because the default
scheme is so friggin ugly it isn't funny.
Anyone want to send me a configuration setup with Python in mind, and
decent colors?
--
When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
can't understand customization even without going through a hundred
menus that might contain
Are there no windows binaries for SciPy for python 2.4 yet? I try to
run the installer and it complains that it can't find python 2.3.
Besides that, vectorize is exactly what i want.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Oh well. I am downloading all the things to build it, but in the mean
time I just did:
def get_y_mat(x_ind,y_ind):
return self.y_min + y_ind*self.dy
def get_x_mat(x_ind,y_ind):
return self.x_min + x_ind*self.dx
I know there are probably alternatives for this with the standard
library, but I think that would kill the speed I get with numarray:
Say I have two 2-dimensional numarrays (x_mat and y_mat, say), and a
function f(x,y) that I would like to evaluate at every index.
Basically I want to be able to
