[Followup-To: header set to comp.lang.functional.]
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:30:51 -0400, George Neuner gneuner2/@/comcast.net
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:50:30 -0700, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
5. This is arguable and trivial, but i think TeX judged as a computer
language in
[Followup-To: header set to comp.lang.perl.misc.]
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:38:34 -0700, Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
you'd show off your community a bit
better by entertaining even the most naive questions - people have to
start somewhere, you know.
However asking a good question
Nameless wrote:
Why should I keep on learning lisp when there are python and perl?
The more programing languages you know the better programer you will
be. Lisp can teach you a number of key things that are required to
be a good programmer in any of the P* lanuages.
--
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:09:43 +0200, Tassilo v. Parseval
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I am only familiar with its successor Modula-3 which, as far as I
understand, is Modula-2 with uppercased keywords and some OO-notion
bolted onto it (I still recall 'BRANDED' references).
Modula-2 also
On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:16:02 +0200, Tassilo v. Parseval
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also sprach John W. Kennedy:
[...]
Most often, languages with strong typing can be found on the functional
front (such as ML and Haskell). These languages have a dynamic typing
system. I haven't yet come across
On 15 May 2005 02:50:38 -0700, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the Perl code.
Where did you learn to program? Its highly unlikely that a Perl
programer would ever write a range function as there is a built in
Perl function that does the same thing. If your intent is purely
accedemic
On 12 Jan 2005 08:22:04 GMT, Abigail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Wrong. Perl functions don't take memory addresses. Perl doesn't allow
the programmer to do direct memory access.
Perl's pack function will allow you to do direct memory access if you
ask it to via the p and P templates.
--
