On Aug 6, 3:55 pm, Tommy Grav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a file with the format
>
> Field f29227: Ra=20:23:46.54 Dec=+67:30:00.0 MJD=53370.06797690 Frames
> 5 Set 1
> Field f31448: Ra=20:24:58.13 Dec=+79:39:43.9 MJD=53370.06811620 Frames
> 5 Set 2
> Field f31226: Ra=20:24:45.50 Dec=+78
On Jul 29, 11:23 pm, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 28, 6:49 pm, Svenn Are Bjerkem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi again,
>
> > when I get far enough to parse the VHDL (which is not currently the
> > fact, but
On Jul 28, 6:49 pm, Svenn Are Bjerkem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> when I get far enough to parse the VHDL (which is not currently the
> fact, but I have to look at the work coming up downstream) I will have
> to put it into an internal data structure and then write some classes
> to
On Jun 4, 4:44 am, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:25:19 -0700, Jesse Aldridge wrote:
> > I've got a module that I use regularly. I want to make some extensive
> > changes to this module but I want all of the programs that depend on the
> > module to keep workin
On Jun 1, 10:25 am, Shriphani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to solve the sumtrian problem in the SPOJ problem set
> (https://www.spoj.pl/problems/SUMTRIAN/) and this is the solution I
> submitted:http://pastebin.ca/1035867
>
> The result was, "Your solution from 2008-06-01 15:13
On May 26, 6:06 pm, Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 15:49:33 -0400, Dan Upton wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if it would necessarily look like the CPython VM, except
> > for the decode stage (this being said with
On May 26, 3:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> what is the definition of a highlevel-language?
>
There's no formal definition of high level language. Thus, the
following are true:
1) You can safely treat it as buzzword
2) You can't formally define a level hierarchy of languages
3) You can't
On May 22, 6:09 am, Ross Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Finally (and the answer is obvious). 387 breaks the standards and
> >doesn't use IEEE double precision when requested to do so.
>
> A
On May 22, 1:41 am, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > Notice that 1e16-1 doesn't exist in IEEE double precision:
> > > 1e16-2 == 0x1.1c37937e07fffp+53
> > > 1e16 == 0x1.1c37937e08p+53
>
> > > (that is, the hex repr
On May 22, 1:36 am, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 22, 1:26 am, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 21, 3:38 pm, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >>> a = 1e16-
On May 22, 1:26 am, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 21, 3:38 pm, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> a = 1e16-2.
> > >>> a
> > 9998.0
> > >>> a+0.999 # gives expecte
On May 21, 3:38 pm, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> a = 1e16-2.
> >>> a
> 9998.0
> >>> a+0.999 # gives expected result
> 9998.0
> >>> a+0. # doesn't round correctly.
>
> 1.0
Notice that 1e16-1 doesn't exist in IEEE double precision:
On May 19, 5:25 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's at least one (possibly incomplete) C interpreter. FWIW, it
> would not be harder (and possibly simpler) to write a byte-code+VM
> based C implementation than it is to write CPython, Jython or
You may (right now, readily,
On May 19, 5:46 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 mai, 17:53, Henrique Dante de Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > Yes, I was actually referring to statically typed JIT-compiled
> > languages. Sorry about t
On May 19, 5:35 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The situation would be simpler if there were good well-known toolkits
> > for optimization in python (like numpy for matrix operations), but
> > that's not the case.
>
> There's at least Psyco (if you're willing and able to res
On May 19, 3:07 pm, Vicent Giner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, of course, but that should mean that I have to do it better, in
> the programming step (I would have to re-program or re-implement my
> algorithm). And I think the problem would be the same in any other
> language, wouldn't it?
On May 19, 7:03 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Vicent Giner a écrit :
>
> > Hello.
>
> > I am new to Python. It seems a very interesting language to me. Its
> > simplicity is very attractive.
>
> > However, it is usually said that Python is not a compiled but
> > interpreted programming language
On May 19, 6:52 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Henrique Dante de Almeida a écrit :
>
> > On May 17, 7:32 pm, Vicent Giner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello.
>
> (snip)
> >> However, it is usually said that Python is not a compiled but
> >>
On May 19, 10:28 am, Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think that it is important. But if you are interested:
>
> - yes, the server will probably be I/O bound, not CPU bound
> - I'm have experience with thread programming, but not with twisted
That part was just to show you that
On May 17, 7:32 pm, Vicent Giner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am new to Python. It seems a very interesting language to me. Its
> simplicity is very attractive.
>
> However, it is usually said that Python is not a compiled but
> interpreted programming language —I mean, it is not like
>
> yeah I don't know much about that, I was figuring perhaps I could limit the
> assembler parts / methodology to something I could write generically
> enough.. and if all else fails write for the other OS's or only support
> windows. also I think I should be using SIMD of some sort, and I'm no
On May 16, 9:26 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you consider gzipping your XML (or YAML) packets ? Would the
> > transfer time be acceptable in this case ?
>
> That would add even more to the overhead of transcoding the
> transportlayer. Switching from XMLRPC to a json-ba
On May 16, 7:16 am, Laszlo Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
Hello, :-)
>
> I'm trying to write a multi threaded TPC server. I have used xmlrpc
How exactly did you come to the conclusion that your server must be
multi threaded ?
> - I have to send larger amounts of data, the overhe
Em Thu, 15 May 2008 19:20:58 +0200, Andreas Tawn escreveu:
>>print os.path.exists('C:\Users\saftarn\Desktop\NetFlixDataSet
>>\training_set') returns False...
>>
>>i have thourogly checked the filename to be correct and if we assume it
>>is what could this mean then?
>>i had a problem one other tim
Em Thu, 15 May 2008 08:03:40 -0700, p.wallstedt escreveu:
> Hi all!
>
> I have a small but rather annoying problem with pyserial. I want to open
> a file on disk for reading and then open a com-port, write lines from
> the file to the port and then read something back and compare it to the
> next
Em Wed, 14 May 2008 10:01:40 -0700, castironpi escreveu:
> On May 14, 11:58 am, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Love them opticals.
Testing. :-P
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
26 matches
Mail list logo
