Am 24.02.2011 17:19, schrieb s...@uce.gov:
Is there a better way to convert int to bytes then going through strings:
x=5
str(x).encode()
Thanks.
bytes([8])
b'\x08'
seems more straight forward...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Am 26.02.2011 12:26, schrieb J. Gerlach:
Am 24.02.2011 17:19, schrieb s...@uce.gov:
Is there a better way to convert int to bytes then going through strings:
x=5
str(x).encode()
Thanks.
bytes([8])
b'\x08'
seems more straight forward...
... but it gives a different result. I
Am 21.02.2011 16:04, schrieb Luther:
I've tried installing pygtk, pygobject, and gobject-introspection from
source, but none of them will compile, and nothing I install through
synaptic has any effect.
I've tried too many things to post all the details here, but I'll post
any details on
Am 08.12.2010 03:23, schrieb Yingjie Lan:
Hi,
According to the doc, group(0) is the entire match.
m = re.match(r(\w+) (\w+), Isaac Newton, physicist)
m.group(0) # The entire match 'Isaac Newton'
But if you do this:
import re
re.sub(r'(\d{3})(\d{3})', r'\0 to \1-\2', '757234')
Am 29.11.2010 14:50, schrieb Thomas Guettler:
Hi,
I think it would be nice if you could use the hashlib in one line:
hashlib.sha256().update('abc').hexdigest()
Unfortunately update() returns None.
Is there a way to convert a string to the hexdigest of sha256 in one line?
Thomas
Am 06.11.2010 02:36, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:19:47 +0100, J. Gerlach wrote:
Am 28.10.2010 03:40, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
[ snip a lot of wise words ]
Can I put this (translated) in the german python wiki? I guess it might
help more people to understand some
Am 28.10.2010 03:40, schrieb Steven D'Aprano:
[ snip a lot of wise words ]
Can I put this (translated) in the german python wiki?
I guess it might help more people to understand some decisions taken
during python's development - and I'm to lazy to do something similar
myself ;)
Greetings from
Am 13.10.2010 14:26, schrieb Jon Clements:
On 12 Oct, 20:21, J. Gerlach gerlach_jo...@web.de wrote:
Am 12.10.2010 17:10, schrieb Roy Smith:
[A]re there any plans to update the api to allow an iterable instead of
a sequence?
[sqlite3 example snipped]
What happens if you do
Am 12.10.2010 17:10, schrieb Roy Smith:
[A]re there any plans to update the api to allow an iterable instead of
a sequence?
sqlite3 (standard library, python 2.6.6., Windows 32Bit) does that already::
import sqlite3 as sql
connection = sql.connect(:memory:)
cursor = connection.execute(