John Reese added the comment:
Is there an ETA for having Big Sur support backported to the 3.8 branch, or is
it already there and I'm just not seeing it here?
--
nosy: +jreese
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
John Reese added the comment:
The problem I'm trying to solve is around functions that operate on a
Union[Leaf, Node], and want to be able to do things like `grandchildren =
node.children[0].children + node.children[1].children` (contrived example, but
point being tuple+list=TypeError while
Change by John Reese :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +7588
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33983>
___
___
Python-
New submission from John Reese :
When type checking applications using lib2to3, the difference in types for
lib2to3.pytree.Base.children versus Node.children makes it difficult to accept
both leaves and nodes and programatically work with child nodes/leaves.
Base/Leaf both have `children
Change by John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
--
nosy: +jreese, lukasz.langa
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33516>
___
Change by John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +6553
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net> added the comment:
This looks like an issue specific to Windows? I can't replicate on Mac, and
given Windows' method of implementing "symlinks" as junctions.
--
nosy: +jreese
___
Pyt
John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net> added the comment:
Looks like this is already changed for 3.7: see commit a22a127458
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
--
nosy: +jreese
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33496>
___
__
Change by John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
--
nosy: +lukasz.langa
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33504>
___
_
Change by John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +6504
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
The configparser module uses `collections.OrderedDict` as its default, but this
is no longer necessary in 3.7+ due to the semantics of core dictionaries being
ordered by design. configparser should just use `dict` by default now, i
Changes by John Reese jre...@leetcode.net:
--
nosy: -jreese
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6715
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by John Reese jre...@leetcode.net:
--
nosy: +jreese
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6715
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
It seems like it would be clear and mostly backwards compatible if the
+ operator on any iterables created a new iterable that iterated
throught first its left operand and then its right, in the style of
itertools.chain. This would allow summation of generator expressions,
among other things, to
Hi.
import time, calendar, datetime
n= 1133893540.874922
datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(n)
datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 10, 25, 40, 874922)
lt= _
datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(n)
datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 18, 25, 40, 874922)
gmt= _
So it's easy to create datetime objects from
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:05:06 +0100, Stephen Illingworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Reese wrote:
Morning. I've been running into an error message pertaining to SSL
that I don't understand, and I was hoping someone had some insight.
Gmail provides POP access over SSL on port 587, so I tried
Morning. I've been running into an error message pertaining to SSL
that I don't understand, and I was hoping someone had some insight.
Gmail provides POP access over SSL on port 587, so I tried to use
poplib.POP_SSL, with the following results:
%python
Python 2.4.1 (#1, May 16 2005, 15:19:29)
Why hello there ha ha.
I have got in the habit of testing the types of variables with
isinstance and the builtin type names instead of using the types
module, as was the style back around Python 2.1. That is, rather than
if type(x) == types.ListType:
I now do:
if isinstance(x, list):
You know how you can specify that stderr, stdin, stdout should be
unbuffered by running python with the -u switch? Is there any way I
can have the same affect in code by doing something to the sys.std*
variables?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
def uselessHash(filename):
fp= open(filename)
hash= 0
for line in fp:
hash ^= hash(line.strip())
fp.close() # do I need this or is fp closed by ref count?
return hash
Consider the function above. Do I need the fp.close(), or will the
file be closed automatically when fp goes
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:06:51 -0400, Peter Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Reese wrote:
Is there a memory or heap profiler for python programs? So that, for
example, if a program was bloating over time I could see how many of
each object there were and maybe even where the references were
Good afternoon, ha ha ha!
Is there a memory or heap profiler for python programs? So that, for
example, if a program was bloating over time I could see how many of
each object there were and maybe even where the references were?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:48:34 -0800, Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mozilla, Firefox, Thunderbird, and so forth use this awful format
called MORK to store all kinds of things: which messages you've read
in a newsgroup, headers and indexes into the mbox
Mozilla, Firefox, Thunderbird, and so forth use this awful format
called MORK to store all kinds of things: which messages you've read
in a newsgroup, headers and indexes into the mbox file of messages in
a mail folder, and address books. It's documented to some extent
here:
On 03 Jan 2005 18:11:06 +, John J. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Re ternary operator: Everybody who read this list at certain times in
the past is painfully aware of that fact, and of precisely why it's
not quite true, and of all the syntax alternatives for real ternary
conditionals that
On 03 Jan 2005 18:27:52 +, John J. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Galvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christopher J. wrote:
I tried this, but it didn't work:
conn.request(GET, /somepage.html, None,
{AUTHORIZATION: Basic username:password})
[...]
import re, base64, urllib2
Hello there. I've run into some missing functionality with HTTP Digest
authentication in the 2.3 library and I was wondering if I'm just
missing something.
Missing functionality the first: urllib2
1a. You can add handlers to your opener indicating that you want to
use HTTP Digest auth.
In comp.lang.python, [I] wrote:
Hello there. I've run into some missing functionality with HTTP Digest
authentication in the 2.3 library and I was wondering if I'm just
missing something.
Missing functionality the first: urllib2
1a. You can add handlers to your opener indicating that you
29 matches
Mail list logo
