variables and declarative concurrency' and
onward.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oz_(programming_language)
-
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the
languages Erlang and Oz to get an idea.
-
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
!
David
Perl is solidly based in the UNIX world on awk, sed, bash and C.
I don't like the style, but many do.
--
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the ANSI group could have spent more time
on naming.
--
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
constitute a copywright
infrigment :)
--
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
testing. Create regression tests to verify application
functionality and user acceptance.
There is also a Lisp interface cl-selesium though I can't find the code on
the net now.
--
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
))
create variables with dynamic scope.
let and let* do as you said use a lexical scope. (unless you use a declare
as above)
--
John Thingstad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:25:19 +0200, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laziness, Perl, and Larry Wall
Xah Lee, 20021124
In the unix community there's quite a large confusion and wishful
thinking about the word laziness. In this post, i'd like to make some
clarifications.
American Heritage
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 05:19:49 +0100, //[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So don't (poke (random) value). That would be obvious to anyone
capable of writing a device driver in C or Lisp or Oberon or
Similarly in C programs, don't do
*random = 0;
Avoiding that is
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:19:40 +0100, //[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incorrect, I believe. The above is like saying Lisp's lack of
optional manual storage allocation and machine pointers makes Lisp
less powerful. It's in fact the absence of those features that lets
garbage collection work
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:13:26 +0100, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not even close.
In my example above:
for a in y:
dosomethingwith(a)
y could be a lot of built-in types such as an array, list, tuple, dict,
file, or set.
- Paddy.
I was refering to the recursive Lisp example.
Did you
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:39:44 +0100, Timofei Shatrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 18:03:49 -0800, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] tried to
confuse
everyone with this message:
There are a lot of people that use Wikipedia. I think some of them
might want to learn to program.
I think you
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:54:58 +0100, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Uhl wrote:
Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Speaking as somebody who programmed in FORTH for a while, that doesn't
impress me much. Prefix/postfix notation is, generally speaking, more
of a pain in the
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:04:04 +0100, mystilleef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill Atkins wrote:
Are any of these not subjective?
Objectivity is in the eye of the beholder.
Lisp is much more than a functional language.
Maybe so. But I've only ever appreciated its functional aspects. I
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:49:59 +0100, mystilleef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Donkeys have wings.
? You attitude towards CLOS is obviously insane.
In the windows world the best way to access system libraries are
via .NET. Thus each language inventing it's own libraries is quickly
becoming
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:29:43 +0100, Steven D'Aprano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh my god! Lisp can echo STRINGS to the interpreter Why didn't
somebody somebody tell me that That *completely* changes my mind
about
the language!
I'm especially impressed that it knew I wanted them
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:11:22 +0200, Anton van Straaten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this context, the term latently-typed language refers to the
language that a programmer experiences, not to the subset of that
language which is all that we're typically able to
On Tue, 23 May 2006 15:58:12 +0200, John D Salt jdsalt_AT_gotadsl.co.uk
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[Snips]
Wrong. We live in a paradise of ideas and possibilities well beyond the
wildest dreams of only 20 years ago.
What exciting new ideas exist in software
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:33:49 +0100, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i longed for such a accountable predictions for a long time. Usually,
some fucking fart will do predictions, but the problem is that it's not
accountable. So, lots fuckhead morons in the IT industry will shout
... more
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:48:01 +0200, Xah Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for various notes. Bonono?
I will have to look at the itertools module. Just went to the doc
http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.1/lib/module-itertools.html
looks interesting.
But I believe Python is designed for
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
21 matches
Mail list logo
