castironpi wrote:
Hi,
I've got an in-place memory manager that uses a disk-backed memory-
mapped buffer. Among its possibilities are: storing variable-length
strings and structures for persistence and interprocess communication
with mmap.
It allocates segments of a generic buffer by length
castironpi wrote:
On Aug 24, 9:52 am, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
castironpi wrote:
Hi,
I've got an in-place memory manager that uses a disk-backed memory-
mapped buffer. Among its possibilities are: storing variable-length
strings and structures for persistence and interprocess
Peter Otten wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 10:10 pm, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jlist wrote:
I think what makes more sense is to compare the code one most
typically writes. In my case, I always use range() and never use psyco.
But I guess for most of my work
James Brady wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a python library that lets me execute shell commands
on remote machines.
I've tried a few SSH utilities so far: paramiko, PySSH and pssh;
unfortunately all been unreliable, and repeated questions on their
respective mailing lists haven't been
Peter Otten wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Peter Otten wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 10:10 pm, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jlist wrote:
I think what makes more sense is to compare the code one most
typically writes. In my case, I always use range() and never use
psyco
Angel Gutierrez wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:44:14 -0700, alex23 wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, about 20% of the time he measures is the time taken to
print junk to the screen.
Which makes his claim that all the console outputs have been removed so
jlist wrote:
I think what makes more sense is to compare the code one most
typically writes. In my case, I always use range() and never use psyco.
But I guess for most of my work with Python performance hasn't been
a issue. I haven't got to write any large systems with Python yet, where
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
Kris Kennaway schrieb:
I would like to MIME encode a message from a large file without first
loading the file into memory. Assume the file has been pre-encoded on
disk (actually I am using encode_7or8bit, so the encoding should be
null). Is there a way to construct
I would like to MIME encode a message from a large file without first
loading the file into memory. Assume the file has been pre-encoded on
disk (actually I am using encode_7or8bit, so the encoding should be
null). Is there a way to construct the flattened MIME message such that
data is
marc wyburn wrote:
Hi and thanks,
I was hoping to avoid having to weld qmarks together but I guess
that's why people use things like SQL alchemy instead. It's a good
lesson anyway.
The '?' substitution is there to safely handle untrusted input. You
*don't* want to pass in arbitrary user
Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
The only problem I can see is that 32-bit programs can't access 64-bit
dlls, so the OP might have to install the 32-bit version of Python for
it to work.
Anyway, all of this is beside the point, because the multiprocessing
module works fine on amd64 systems.
Kris
--
John Machin wrote:
Uh-huh ... try this, then:
http://hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dyoo/python/ahocorasick/
You could use this to find the Str cases and the prefixes of the
re cases (which seem to be no more complicated than 'foo.*bar.*zot')
and use something slower like Python's re to search the
J. Cliff Dyer wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 12:29 -0700, samwyse wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:01 am, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
samwyse wrote:
You might want to look at Plex.
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/python/Plex/
Another advantage of Plex is that it compiles all
Laszlo Nagy wrote:
Abhishek Asthana wrote:
Hi all ,
I have large set of data computation and I want to break it into
small batches and assign it to different threads .I am implementing it
in python only. Kindly help what all libraries should I refer to
implement the multithreading in
John Machin wrote:
Hmm, unfortunately it's still orders of magnitude slower than grep in my
own application that involves matching lots of strings and regexps
against large files (I killed it after 400 seconds, compared to 1.5 for
grep), and that's leaving aside the much longer compilation time
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [20080709 14:08], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It's compiler/build output.
Sounds like the FreeBSD ports build cluster. :)
Yes indeed!
Kris, have you tried a PGO build of Python with your specific usage? I
cannot guarantee
samwyse wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:01 am, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
samwyse wrote:
You might want to look at Plex.
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/python/Plex/
Another advantage of Plex is that it compiles all of the regular
expressions into a single DFA. Once that's done
samwyse wrote:
On Jul 4, 6:43 am, Henning_Thornblad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What can be the cause of the large difference between re.search and
grep?
While doing a simple grep:
grep '[^ =]*/' input (input contains 156.000 a in
one row)
doesn't even take a second.
Is this a
samwyse wrote:
On Jul 4, 6:43 am, Henning_Thornblad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What can be the cause of the large difference between re.search and
grep?
While doing a simple grep:
grep '[^ =]*/' input (input contains 156.000 a in
one row)
doesn't even take a second.
Is this a
Paddy wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:36 pm, Peter Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning_Thornblad wrote:
What can be the cause of the large difference between re.search and
grep?
grep uses a smarter algorithm ;)
This script takes about 5 min to run on my computer:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import re
Scott David Daniels wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Thanks for the pointers, I think a C extension will end up being the
way to go, unless someone has beaten me to it and I just haven't found
it yet.
Depending on the pattern length you are targeting, it may be fastest to
increase the out-of-loop
I am trying to parse a bit-stream file format (bzip2) that does not have
byte-aligned record boundaries, so I need to do efficient matching of
bit substrings at arbitrary bit offsets.
Is there a package that can do this? This one comes close:
http://ilan.schnell-web.net/prog/bitarray/
but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway:
I am trying to parse a bit-stream file format (bzip2) that does not have
byte-aligned record boundaries, so I need to do efficient matching of
bit substrings at arbitrary bit offsets.
Is there a package that can do this?
You may take a look at Hachoir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway:
Unfortunately I didnt find anything else useful here yet :(
I see, I'm sorry, I have found hachoir quite nice in the past. Maybe
there's no really efficient way to do it with Python, but you can
create a compiled extension, so you can see if it's fast
Is anyone aware of python bindings for ZFS? I just want to replicate
(or at least wrap) the command line functionality for interacting with
snapshots etc. Searches have turned up nothing.
Kris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Calvin Spealman wrote:
Upload, wait, and google them.
Seriously tho, aside from using a real indexer, I would build a set of
the words I'm looking for, and then loop over each file, looping over
the words and doing quick checks for containment in the set. If so, add
to a dict of file names
Gary Herron wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 2:08 am, kalakouentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know a way to actually load my data in a more
batch-like way so I will avoid the constant line by line reading?
If your files will fit in memory, you can just do
text =
Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner wrote:
[ Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
I want to make use of UNIX credential passing on a local domain socket
to verify the identity of a user connecting to a privileged service.
However it looks like the socket module doesn't implement
sendmsg/recvmsg wrappers
If I do the following:
def mmap_search(f, string):
fh = file(f)
mm = mmap.mmap(fh.fileno(), 0, mmap.MAP_SHARED, mmap.PROT_READ)
return mm.find(string)
def mmap_is_in(f, string):
fh = file(f)
mm = mmap.mmap(fh.fileno(), 0, mmap.MAP_SHARED, mmap.PROT_READ)
I want to make use of UNIX credential passing on a local domain socket
to verify the identity of a user connecting to a privileged service.
However it looks like the socket module doesn't implement
sendmsg/recvmsg wrappers, and I can't find another module that does this
either. Is there
30 matches
Mail list logo
