Mahmoud Abdelkader mabdelka...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the clarification Terry. This is indeed not a bug. For reference,
the pieces of code I pasted line-wrapped after the 76th character, which was my
main source of confusion.
After reading RFC3548, I am now informed
New submission from Mahmoud Abdelkader mabdelka...@gmail.com:
Given a string, encoding it with .encode('base64') is not the same as using
base64's b64encode function. I think this is very unclear and unintuitive.
Here's some example code to demonstrate the problem. Before I attempt to submit
http://codingforums.com/showthread.php?s=e26b8b0aabc69745ef24a855b1a0fc83t=177529
It seems that this dude really is looking for how to double a variable...
hi looking for help catching up in a class and overall to get me better than
i am now. I can pay you by the week or per hour.
everything
for is to launch multiple threads that
process different parts of the file (different chunks) and return their
results, probably indexed by their chunk offset. Then I can iterate over
that sequentially. I think that would be a trivial parallel optimization.
Thoughts? Comments?
Thanks very much,
Mahmoud
Why don't you write a python extension module? This is a perfect opportunity
for that.
--
mahmoud mack abdelkader
http://blog.mahmoudimus.com/
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM,
travis+ml-pyt...@subspacefield.orgtravis%2bml-pyt...@subspacefield.org
wrote:
Hello,
Historically, I have used
A few code critiques:
- Your code is not very help friendly because it can not be run, so I have
to deadlist debug it.
- There are various syntax errors in the code:
- for example: file is not defined when you invoke tail(file)
- You are overshadowing a built-in type 'file' by that name,
What Paul was trying to elaborate on is that have your customers or whomever
will use this implement their own generator protocol to generate whatever
number format they need. Paul just gave you an example with
itertools.count(), where it is an infinite generator that yields count+1
every time.