Re: a Haskell a Day

2005-10-26 Thread Martin Ambuhl
Xah Lee wrote: > This is my learning notes on Haskell. I call it a-Haskell-a-day. No one in any of comp.lang.perl.misc, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.unix.programmer gives a damn about your adventures in Haskell. If you must mastubate, please do so i

Re: Python docs [was: function with a state]

2005-03-24 Thread Martin Ambuhl
Xah Lee wrote: The Python doc is relatively lousy, from content organization to the tech writing quality. I think i'll just post snippets of my comments as i find them. (and feel like exposing) The cross-posting idiot is back. Next he'll be posting his readings from Richard Burton's _Arabian Nigh

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

2005-01-28 Thread Martin Ambuhl
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: Martin Ambuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Dan Perl wrote: | | > Actually, it can be as simple as: | > public class test { | | There is no "public" or "class" in C. Please don't post such trash to | comp.lang.c. In fact, C++ is no

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

2005-01-28 Thread Martin Ambuhl
Xah Lee wrote his usual masturbatory crap: Lisp is not topical in 3 of the 5 newsgroups you spewed on. Java is not topical in 5 of the 5 newsgroups you spewed on. Get your head out your butt and post to Java newsgroups if you want and they'll have you. Are you inflicting this crap on the rest of

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

2005-01-28 Thread Martin Ambuhl
Dan Perl wrote: Actually, it can be as simple as: public class test { There is no "public" or "class" in C. Please don't post such trash to comp.lang.c. In fact, C++ is not topical in any of the five newsgroups you posted to. I don't know where you're posting from, so I apologize to the perl,