Michael Driscoll added the comment:
Whatever became of this? We just stumbled across this bug in our code at work
where we accidentally put multiple files of the same name into the zip file and
not only does it not overwrite the others, but when you go to access that file
name, it grabs
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Do I need to do anything else to those patches I submitted?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14446
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I added the extra information to the docstring for the shuffle method and
attached a patch.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +michael.driscoll
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25938/shuffle.patch
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I don't see the error, TimeoutExpired, documented either. At least the doc page
mentions CalledProcessError a couple times. Do we want to use the docstring for
CalledProcessError for the documentation page? Where on the page would
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I thought the ebook, Modern Tkinter for Busy Python Developers by Mark
Roseman was pretty good too:
http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Tkinter-Python-Developers-ebook/dp/B0071QDNLO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1339446684sr=8-1
--
nosy
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Here's the doc patch. The local repo I was using yesterday is on a different
computer that I don't have access to today. Hopefully applying two patches is
okay. If not, I can redo the other patch and add it to this one
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I'm assuming Nick is talking about the stdtypes.rst (in Doc/library) file,
correct? If so, I went ahead and created a simple patch that almost uses his
verbiage verbatim.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +michael.driscoll
Added file
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
After reading up on both issues, I think I found all the instances that were
deprecated and removed them. A patch is attached that includes the edits for
tkinter/__init__.py and the _tkinter.c files.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I just noticed that we'll need to update the Documentation for tkinter too as
it mentions the AtEnd etc methods. Do you want me to create a patch for that or
a new ticket + patch
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Here are a few proposals that spring to mind:
1a) Update all Windows references to Windows 7 or Vista/7. We can include XP,
but I think Microsoft is dropping support next year.
1b) Update all Python references to the current version
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
I know Python 3.x still runs on XP too, but should we continue to mention it in
our documentation? I don't know. Part of the reason I wrote up all that was to
see if people had any well thought out arguments one way or the other
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Should the patch for 1b replace Python 2.2 with Python 2.7/3.2 or just Python
3.2?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14901
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Could we say just Python and ignore the version number? Or would Python 2.7
work for the 2.7 branch patch since there isn't supposed to be a 2.8 and then
for Python 3 we could go with 3.x
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Okay. Here are a couple from
http://docs.python.org/faq/windows.html#how-do-i-run-a-python-program-under-windows:
You may also find that you have a Start-menu entry such as Start ‣ Programs ‣
Python 2.2 ‣ Python (command line
New submission from Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org:
I was reading through http://docs.python.org/faq/windows.html and noticed that
its examples are based on Python 2.2-2.3 and it only really covers up to
Windows 2000 with just a couple mentions of XP.
There are also sections
Changes by Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org:
--
components: +Windows
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python
3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14901
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Here's a new patch that I think addresses both issues. Thanks for your insights.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25678/setup.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
@ Eli - Sorry about that. I just went with Brian's wording on that. I didn't
realize it was plural. My experience with Visual Studio is limited, although I
hope to rectify that at some point. Anyway, I corrected the patch and attached
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Thanks for the tip Eli. I'll try to remember to number my patches next time.
This is my first time doing this.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14884
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Looking at 3.3.rst, it looks like we could just add the blurb to the end of the
file in the Other issues section. The windows.rst file is potentially more
complicated as I assume we need to leave the directions for adding the path
New submission from Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org:
In http://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html#windows the devguide mentions
that the user must go to the Build menu to run Build Solution. When I tried
doing that with Visual C++ 2010 per the instructions, I discovered
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
@Brian - Sorry I didn't include a screenshot earlier. I was running it on a
machine without good screen capturing software. I've rectified that and
attached a screenshot for you. I suspect that there's a difference between the
VC
Michael Driscoll m...@pythonlibrary.org added the comment:
Yeah, my patch didn't turn out the way I expected. I replaced Build with
Debug and then noticed that it also referred to some kind of build
drop-down that didn't seem like the right term. I couldn't figure out what the
right term
23 matches
Mail list logo
