Michael Felt added the comment:
update: went back to check what worked, did not work without the environment
variable set.
I am going to guess that pip(3) is able to make use of the environment variable
SSL_CERT_FILE as pip download fails (in some cases) without it, but succeeds
Michael Felt added the comment:
Any comments re: environment variables - even if the answer is None!
--
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34
Michael Felt added the comment:
as this is fixed is Python3.7 (see issue26439) and has been stated several
times that it will not be fixed in Python2.7 I suspect this issue may also be
closed.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.
New submission from Michael Felt :
As far as I can tell _ssl works properly. However, test_ssl returns FAIL at
some very basic levels, e.g.
...
test_constructor (test.test_ssl.ContextTests) ... ERROR
...
test_protocol (test.test_ssl.ContextTests) ... ERROR
test_python_ciphers
Michael Felt added the comment:
OK. as promised when I closed PR 5183 - a restart.
You may skip the wall that follows - it is just documentation.
The key points:
* AIX ifconfig and arp do not supply maccaddr
* netstat supplies a macaddr, but uses '.' not ':' as a delimiter
** also, AIX
Michael Felt added the comment:
There is a big chance it is not a direct issue with either python or pip /
rather an issue with how current your "openssl" setup is.
As an example, using git I was not able to "pull" from a remote. This git (that
also depends on pyth
Michael Felt added the comment:
@tarek - anything specific/extra you need?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue11191>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Michael Felt added the comment:
Again, the PR worked months ago. I expect it to still work.
So, I guess the question is: is there any interest. After several weeks of
waiting after the last ttt - still waiting :)
--
components: +Tests -ctypes
Michael Felt added the comment:
imho - this should have status "closed"
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26439>
___
___
Python-b
Michael Felt added the comment:
I was not aware that _uuid was new to python3-3.7. I thought it had been around
for a long time.
Bpo-28009 goes back two years and i was unaware of uuid_create().
Would it be easier to split it into 3 issues? One for unixdll, one for netstat,
and one
Michael Felt added the comment:
OK. I know I do not understand this well - when it goes in A, or B.
So, if I understand correctly, like this issue was created after
uuid_create() was added for AIX and created issues for FreeBSD )that I
did not know had uuid_create(), I need to create a new
Michael Felt added the comment:
@vstinner - I know this is "closed", however, I submit a minor PR to fix an
error in PR7104. The logic of configure.ac always defines HAVE_UUID_ENC_BE.
I cannot proceed with PR5183 (aka issue28009) until this is repa
Change by Michael Felt :
--
pull_requests: +7139
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32493>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Michael Felt :
--
pull_requests: +7082
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32493>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Michael Felt added the comment:
I hope this can be reviewed and eventually closed - not because it is X years
old and unresolved - but because it is resolved for the latest branches!
Thx
--
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<ht
Michael Felt added the comment:
Please review PR. at least for "master"
--
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue28009>
___
__
Michael Felt added the comment:
I know it is not earth shattering - but it will permit one more test to pass.
Please review the PR. Thx.
--
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Wishing I could edit a post...
root@x066:[/data/prj/python]find ./python3-3.4.8 git/python3-3.4.8 -name
ld_so_aix
./python3-3.4.8/Modules/ld_so_aix
--
___
Python tracke
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
OOT builds are working for Python2.7, Python3-3.5, Python3-3.6 (and later I
expect) but not for Python3-3.4(.8)
unable to execute '../git/python3-3.4.8/Modules/ld_so_aix': No such file or
directory
while building OOT
root@x066:
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Took me a while to get this 'posted' properly.
- please see https://github.com/python/pythondotorg/issues/1156
My apologies for the noise.
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open
Michael Felt <aixto...@gmail.com> added the comment:
P.s. i apologize for probably posting in the incorrect “issues” area. Having
followed guido’s link i see an area that is new for me.
If it is better that i “restart” the discussion there, just ask.
--
nosy: +aixto...@gma
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
FYI: as my primary effort for AIX concerned ctypes.find_library() - and that is
now in the Python3-3.7 branch - when I do a PR it will only be for "current"
efforts, i.e., Python3-3.7 and later.
As much as I feel it i
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
I struggled with how python was packaged by others. Key points being: many
dependencies, no assurance you could uninstall the dependencies and/or python.
A little over two years ago I started looking for 'root causes' of pr
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 15/04/2018 07:56, Ned Deily wrote:
> Ned Deily <n...@python.org> added the comment:
>
> Thanks for the report and the good detective work! I see the same results.
> It appears that
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
oops, sain openbsd, should be freebsd
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
If it is a bug in OpenBSD how do you propose we "fix" this.
imho, the problem is "outside" python.
however, until it is fixed in openbsd, would you accept an 3error macro that
prevents the mod from being bui
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
pull_requests: +5378
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27643>
___
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
versions: +Python 3.7
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27643>
___
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Now that it is visible - maybe OpenBSD will treat it as a bug and get
the "version bits" to work as their man page
(https://man.openbsd.org/uuid.3) says it does:
STANDARDS <https://man.openbsd.org/uuid.3#STANDARDS&
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
While working in issue11191 I found a fix for Python3-3.6 and later for the
following tests, and later - but not for Python3-3.5
I suppose "we" could ignore the error on Python3-3.5 (as I then have a quick -
simple -
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Just tested the patch presented.
For Python3-3.6.4 the patch in PR-5206 works as is, however, for Python3-3.5.4
- the patch to Lib/test/support/__init__.py does not work.
So, for Python3-3.5, Python3-3.6 and Python3-master - th
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 1/17/2018 11:16 AM, David CARLIER wrote:
> David CARLIER <devne...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Might comes from uuid1 function itself ... e.g. line 704 not setting version
> "field".
IMHO: for
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
typo here:
So, I think the AMD64 FreeBSD 10.x Shared 3.x uuid_create() function is wrong
(if that is what it is using - was it/can it also use the uuid_generate*
routines?
i.e., does AMD FreeBSD use uuid_create() or uuid_ge
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Actually, the libc/libuuid function called should be setting the
version/variant values as well.
So, I think the AMD64 FreeBSD 10.x Shared 3.x uuid_generate() function is wrong
(if that is what it is using - was it/can it al
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
I have tried jumping into the pdp using
but do not come much further in understanding how the expectations expressed in
these comments are satisfied:
+2153 # Tests for the sendmsg()/recvmsg() interface. Where possible, the
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Back to master (python3-3.7)
(note: not your problem - but this link is gone: not a python problem, see
closed aix issue http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ57712)
Getting this (obviously) on AIX 5.3, but also on A
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5060
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
a) Is this normal?
root@x065:[/data/prj/python/git/python3-3.7]./python -m unittest
test.test_distutils
--
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
OK
In short - at the start
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
After even more years - I see the same test failing, just a bit different.
And, others
in short:
./python Lib/test/test_distutils.py
...
Ran 245 tests in 10.337s
FAILED (errors=7, skipped=31)
I have managed to get this to:
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 14/01/2018 22:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Is nohup required in the example you just posted or
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Thanks for the clarification.
Being curious, is there a way to see what the size of the cache is? I want to
believe, but i do not have the impression memory is being reallocated to later
users. My gut feeling is that the code
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
FYI: - On AIX, no uuid_create support:
./python -m unittest -v test.test_uuid
...
Ran 48 tests in 0.261s
OK (skipped=37)
On AIX 6.1 (with ctypes, without _uuid)
./python -m unittest -v test.test_uuid
...
Ran 48 tests in 0.27
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
PR added, please review.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5037
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
in issue25582 - the issue is not (yet) resolved. Perhaps this one can be closed
and issue25582 reopened.
Both from python2-2.7.14 and "git master" I am getting:
michael@x071:[/data/prj/python/git/gcc-python3-3.7]./pytho
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
@panter - your patch seems to be working well. Thanks.
PR 5164 submitted for review
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
pull_requests: +5020
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27643>
___
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 04/08/2016 10:58, Martin Panter wrote:
> Martin Panter added the comment:
>
> Okay, so to be clear, I am assuming XLC supports all of the following fields,
> and uses unsigned bit fields by default:
>
&
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 30/07/2016 02:51, Martin Panter wrote:
> Martin Panter added the comment:
>
>
> ./python -m unittest -v ctypes.test.test_bitfields
>
> What I am suggesting as a fix is to change line 381 from plain “int” to
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
pull_requests: +5012
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 09/01/2018 16:21, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
>
>> What is the desired behavior, specifically, of
> uuid.getnode() - constant, or 'random'?
>
> I'm a
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 08/01/2018 17:22, Michael wrote:
> On 08/01/2018 16:07, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
>>
>> Considering that _uuid is now working for AIX is
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 08/01/2018 16:07, Michael Felt wrote:
> Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
>
> Considering that _uuid is now working for AIX issue32399 - I need to get some
> things straight (aka some help p
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Considering that _uuid is now working for AIX issue32399 - I need to get some
things straight (aka some help please).
Does uuid.py (./Lib/uuid.py) call _uuid.py?
If not, I am curious how _uuid.c is used - because ./Lib/test/test_u
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 08/01/2018 12:47, David Carlier wrote:
> David Carlier <dcarl...@afilias.info> added the comment:
>
> Perfect. That solves in the process OpenBSD uuid module build too.
>
> --
p.s. I did not 'inv
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 05/01/2018 13:38, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> Michael, does AIX have uint32_t? If so, we could happily drop the unsigned32
> reference.
Yes, AIX has unit32
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 24/02/2017 09:44, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner added the comment:
>
> Let's switch to github-based patches to discuss about:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/2.7...ha
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 03/01/2018 18:03, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Xavier de Gaye <xdeg...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> The following patch may be less invasive and more explicit:
>
> diff --git a/Modules/posixmodule.c b/Mo
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Ignore my last comment - I have a headache. If I could edit/delete it I would.
aka "reset 2018 - here I come!"
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://b
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 03/01/2018 14:41, David Edelsohn wrote:
> David Edelsohn <dje@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> _ALL_SOURCE is overkill. It probably is too big a club for this regression.
Maybe. Clearly it is a big club. The d
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
There were changes made - I know not when - but OOT builds work now. This issue
may be closed.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
this was just feedback - and should probably be closed.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
As I was not responding properly (too verbose) - I'll reread the thread for the
initial patch suggestion - and hope it still fits the current 'master'.
My apologies for the long silence on this.
--
nosy: -aixto...@gma
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Did some additional research. The code can work asis when _ALL_SOURCE is
undefined. Or, in other words - there does not have to be a variable syntax
issue or separate code for AIX.
As you read this - please remember that since
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
will open a new PR for ./Doc/library/ctypes.rst
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
As the 'basics' seem to be 'accepted', going to work on the PR so that
configure.ac can prepare the right choices, rather than rely on a hard-coded
_AIX determined macro.
--
___
Python t
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4865
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4863
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Well, replied via email response - but it did not show up here.
You suggestion worked. I'll start a PR and we can see if your suggestion also
works for all the other platforms.
--
___
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Understood.
What I have learned.
Although the types are quite different, they are both 16 bytes.
Starting with AIX 6.1, libc includes uuid_create(, )
which fills "uuid" with a uuid.uuid1() like result.
After callin
Change by Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
--
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32399>
___
__
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
So - KISS principle:
This diff shows what can compile:
diff --git a/Modules/_uuidmodule.c b/Modules/_uuidmodule.c
index d4bc3c7..5550705 100644
--- a/Modules/_uuidmodule.c
+++ b/Modules/_uuidmodule.c
@@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
#
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
I was hoping for something simple - as in:
+1 #define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN
+2
+3 #include "Python.h"
+4 #ifndef _AIX
+5 #include
+6 #else
+7 #include
+8 #endif
However, it
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
Sure - I'll work on a PR. This will be the easier one.
Where I am currently 'lost' is to correct _uuidmodule.c - another thing that
has always been broken (new issue, about t
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
FYI: from /usr/include/types.h
/* typedef for the File System Identifier (fsid). This must correspond
* to the "struct fsid" structure in _ALL_SOURCE below.
*/
typedef struct fsid_t {
#ifdef __64BIT_KERNEL
uns
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
OOps - wrong error!
It is the new fsid variable!
michael@x071:[/data/prj/python/git/python3-3.7.0.a3]xlc_r -DNDEBUG -O
-I/opt/include -O2 -qmaxmem=-1 -qarch=pwr5 -I. -I./Include -I/opt/in>
"./Modules/posixmodule.c&
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
current level: commit 4b965930e8625f77cb0e821daf5cc40e85b45f84 (HEAD -> master,
upstream/master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Build message:
michael@x071:[/data/prj/python/git/python3-3.7.X]make
xlc_r -DNDEBUG -O -I/opt/in
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
SVR4 - stands for AT System V Release 4 - the beginning (as I understand it)
of shared libraries as (indivudual) .so files in UNIX. SVR3 (and earlier) used
.a files (aka archives with members
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
x064 is AIX 5.3, x071 is AIX 6.1, x072 is AIX 7.1 - in the following output
On 11/20/2017 9:01 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> What return commands
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
If I removed you from nosy - purely accidental - probably because you answered
and I still had a dialog open with you not in it.
My apologies in any case. I'll be more careful should something like that
happen again.
I am
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
no. I'll install what I have atm.
Too bad - as now it will have an install dependency.
re: https://bugs.python.org/issue27976#msg274628 -- seems a warning that libffi
is not available might be useful after all.
Question: is ffi
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
FYI: version 3.6.3 compiles and builds without this issue.
+ make install DESTDIR=/var/aixtools/python/Python/3.6.3.0 >
.buildaix/install.out
+ mkinstallp.ksh /var/aixtools/python/Python/3.6.3.0 > .buildaix/mk
New submission from Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl>:
after git clone from master:
make install fails to complete with:
Important - python is not installed already.
FYI: also note - build completes successfully with 2.7.14 (will download and
check other python3 versions)
i
Michael Felt <mich...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
On 11/20/2017 5:22 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> _unixdll_getnode, _ifconfig_getnode, and _arp_getnode were changed recently.
> Are they still n
Michael Felt added the comment:
First, my apology that I have not responded earlier. I had other things
to work on (real life things), customers that had interest in a fix for
find_library() have indicated no longer have interest, and also my
personal issue - becoming disillusioned
Michael Felt added the comment:
Curious.
First pass: using python2.7.12 also hanged as program, on the close()
second pass: interactive - do the read first, then the close - seems to work:
root@x064:[/data/prj/python/issues/29545]cat hello.py
#!/usr/bin/env python
import errno
import os
On 13/03/2017 02:51, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:45 am, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
Steve D'Aprano writes:
[...]
It seems that os.remove on Linux will force the delete even if the file
is read-only or unreadable, provided you own the file.
Your
On 04-Feb-17 02:07, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 03Feb2017 17:21, Wildman wrote:
On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 09:25:42 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Also, what you describe with rc.local wouldn't work anyway, even if
it had ben
what was asked.
Of course, you are correct. I don't
Michael Felt added the comment:
On 31/01/2017 20:22, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner added the comment:
>
> Feels like it is up to me to shed some light on various topics here:
Many thanks!
>
> AIX defines (static) "Object" files and "
Michael Felt added the comment:
OK - so details on the failing tests - for the record only.
However, I would appreciate some 'expert' feedback on what is expected to be
happening in this test:
==
FAIL
Michael Felt added the comment:
I am back at this: (note: short answer to msg277745 - No. does not work for me)
As ... expressed before, this needs to work in three contexts:
2) In-tree testing of build module feature (test_distutils).
Below are results of 'in tree' and 'out of tree' testing
Michael Felt added the comment:
As far as issue10656 and this issue are concerned:
Python-3.4 is out of context (but 3.4.6 was just released) - and does not work
with 'out of tree' builds.
The other versions: 2.7.13, 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 do build out-of-tree.
Note 3.5.3 and 3.6.0 use a different
Michael Felt added the comment:
re: msg286115,
1) Building modules in the tree during the build process.
** if "in the tree" means building outside of source - such as:
../src/python-X.Y.Z/configure ...
make
** the tarball for Python-2.7.13 is building from
../src/Python-2.7.13
Michael Felt added the comment:
You guys are the experts. I can only comment on what I see. IMHO: the file
_sysconfigdata.py is more accurate with nothing in it.
I am clearly confused by whatever process this is. If you believe it is more
accurate to have the BLD variable 'inaccurate
Michael Felt added the comment:
This is "only" for Python-2.7 (for now). The others will be tested as I am able.
Working with the patch submitted 2013-10-19 (aka
https://bugs.python.org/file32229/issue18235.patch)
A) Without/before the patch:
root@x064:[/data/prj/python/Python-2.7
Michael Felt added the comment:
Ok. I shall rebuild from scratch.
When I do, I start from a "clean" system - only the compiler and my mkinstallp
helper script.
I am adding the latest zlib for what I would package but I shall forgoe that
for
Michael Felt added the comment:
I did not go through a whole build process.
Changing:
if _PYTHON_BUILD:
vars['BLDSHARED'] = vars['LDSHARED']
to
if _PYTHON_BUILD:
vars['LDSHARED'] = vars['BLDSHARED']
is not going to help if both variables are wrong in _sysconfigdata
Michael Felt added the comment:
OOPS: I have a ... above, meant to be a link to a message.
I also needed to 'patch' util.py - with 32-bit build with something like this:
--- src/python-2.7.13/Lib/ctypes/util.py2016-12-17 20:05:05 +
+++ python-2.7.13.0/Lib/ctypes/util.py 2017-01-13
Michael Felt added the comment:
I would like to say:
a) I am happy this is being considered for Python3-3.7
b) I still believe it is a "bug" plain and simple - it (find_library()) cannot
work in "normal" situations. Why "IBM" or others never addressed t
501 - 600 of 756 matches
Mail list logo