Re: languages with full unicode support

2006-07-02 Thread Oliver Bandel
Matthias Blume wrote: > Tin Gherdanarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Oliver Bandel wrote: >> >>>こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-) >> >>Uhm, I'd guess that Xah is Chinese. Be careful >>with such things in real life; Koreans might >>beat

Re: languages with full unicode support

2006-06-25 Thread Oliver Bandel
こんいちわ Xah-Lee san ;-) Xah Lee wrote: > Languages with Full Unicode Support > > As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete > unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode. Can you explain what you mena with the names here? > (the JavaScri

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-18 Thread Oliver Bandel
Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > Pascal Bourguignon wrote: > >>(defun ιοτα (&key (номер 10) (단계 1) (בכוכ 0)) >> (loop :for i :from בכוכ :to номер :by 단계 :collect i)) > > > How do you even *enter* these characters? My browser seems to trap all > the special character combinations, and I *know* you

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-16 Thread Oliver Bandel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opalinski from opalpaweb wrote: >>Simply put, tabs is proper, and spaces are improper. >>Why? This may seem >>ridiculously simple given the de facto ball of confusion: the semantics >>of tabs is what indenting is about, while, using spaces to align code >>is a hack. > > > The r

Re: Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code

2006-05-16 Thread Oliver Bandel
Xah Lee wrote: > Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code > > Xah Lee, 2006-05-13 > > In coding a computer program, there's often the choices of tabs or > spaces for code indentation. There is a large amount of confusion about > which is better. It has become what's known as “religious war” — > a heated