bruno Piguet added the comment:
I apologise for coming back to this issue lately, after its closing.
I must have misconfigured something in my tracking system.
Thank-you everybody for the work done, especiallly the careful handling and
documenting of the case only if password is present
Changes by bruno Piguet bruno.pig...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14984
___
___
Python-bugs
bruno Piguet added the comment:
I missed the 3.3 window, may I re-propose the same minimal patch against
3.4.0a1 ?
I'm not sure I follow any python standard lib coding style but the general idea
is quite simple and easy to get.
I chose to ignore the backward compatibility concern, since I
bruno Piguet bruno.pig...@gmail.com added the comment:
Do you agree that the attached patch could be a practical solution ?
The patch is for the 2.6 version of the lib. Transposition to other versions
should be trivial.
If we don't want to break backward compatibility, the solution is to add
New submission from bruno Piguet bruno.pig...@gmail.com:
Most FTP clients require that the .netrc file be owned by the user and
readable/writable by nobody other than the user (ie. permissions set to 0400 or
0600).
The netrc module doesn't do this kind of checking, allowing the use a .netrc
Changes by bruno Piguet bruno.pig...@gmail.com:
--
title: netrc module alows read of non-secured .netrc file - netrc module
allows read of non-secured .netrc file
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14984
On 11 fév, 22:24, LL.Snark ll.sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a pythonic way to translate this short Ruby code :
t=[6,7,8,6,7,9,8,4,3,6,7]
i=t.index {|x| xt.first}
I'm thinking of two methods, depending on the length of the list, and
the fact that you wish (or not) to scan the
