On Feb 27, 5:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 4:16 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a), you use something like obj.a.somemethod(). obj.a still refers to
the same object, even if it changed internally; if obj.a and foo.bar both
were refering to the same object, they
from __future__ import with_statement
'''
3) upon_acquiring( lockA, lockB )( function, *ar, **kwar )
upon_acquiring spawns new thread upon acquiring locks A and B. Locks
may be specified in any order, as none is acquired until all are free.
The options to spawn a new thread upon call, lock,
On Mar 1, 11:54 am, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nexes schrieb:
Hello All,
I am having a minor problem when I try and do this:
c.execute(insert into [tblTranscripts] (MovieID,Transcript)
Values( + movieID + ,' + formatText + ');) (don't even bother
commenting of
On Mar 1, 10:07 am, Lorenzo Gatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:39 pm, Schizoid Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As in variable assignment, not homework assignment! :)
I understand the first line but not the second of the following code:
a, b = 0, 1
a, b = b, a + b
In the first
On Mar 1, 2:05 pm, K Viltersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm reading the docs and at 5.2 the del
statement is discussed. At first, i thought
i've found a typo but as i tried that
myself, it turns it actually does work so.
a = [alpha, beta, gamma]
del a[2:2]
a
Now, i expected the
RPC might be -really- easy.
Mixin class:
getattribute returns a remoting callable if ('name') is callable, or
in a special list. On call, pack the parameters, execute locally, and
broadcast. You'd need two mixins, BroadcasterMixin and ReceiverMixin,
but the same code can still run-- how can
On Mar 1, 6:49 pm, K Viltersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When that fails, try without the stutter G
import tkinter
I must be doing something wrong because
neither tkinter nor tkininter works.
I tried both with and without stuttering.
I even asked my wife to stutter some but,
sadly,
On Mar 1, 2:58 pm, Michael Torrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell Wall. But why not [ 2, 3 ]= 2? Back to your question, another
option is to not subclass.
Umm, no. You need to actually read the posts before you respond to
them. His question was whether or not to
On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Michael Torrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to use a lambda expression to bind some extra contextual data
(should be constant after it's computed) to a call to a function. I had
originally thought I could use something like this demo (but useless) code:
funcs=[]
def
On Feb 29, 12:55 am, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:09:01 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
My goal is to return Deadlock from acquire() if its blocking would
directly create deadlock. Basic example:
[ The
On Feb 29, 12:55 am, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:54:44 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
On Feb 28, 2:30 am, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is time to show your cards or fold
Here. Run it.
On Feb 29, 5:56 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 6:02 pm, Tamer Higazi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Can somebody of you make me a sample how to define a function based on
call by reference ???
I am a python newbie and I am not getting smart
On Feb 28, 3:18 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| But the default behavior may become the true copy, that seems
| simpler for a newbie to grasp.
To me, it is the opposite. If I say
gvr = Guido_van_Russum # or any natural
On Feb 29, 8:12 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 29, 5:56 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 6:02 pm, Tamer Higazi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Can somebody of you make me a sample how to define a
On Feb 29, 8:59 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If you want a computer language to model human thought, then is there
even such thing as subclassing?
Kindly try to limit your ramblings to answerable questions. Without keen
On Feb 29, 5:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 29, 12:55 am, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:09:01 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
My goal is to return Deadlock from acquire() if its blocking would
The Python main interpreter has an at-exit list of callables, which
are called when the interpreter exits. Can threads have one? What's
involved, or is the best way merely to subclass Thread?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 29, 1:55 pm, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The Python main interpreter has an at-exit list of callables, which
are called when the interpreter exits. Can threads have one? What's
involved, or is the best way merely to subclass Thread?
Is
On Feb 29, 2:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 29, 1:55 pm, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The Python main interpreter has an at-exit list of callables, which
are called when the interpreter exits. Can threads have one? What's
On Feb 29, 1:15 pm, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Robert Bossy]
I thought it would be useful if insort and consorts* could accept the
same options than list.sort, especially key and cmp.
If you're going to do many insertions or searches, wouldn't it be
*much* more efficient
On Feb 29, 3:09 pm, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronner, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The native implementation of int goes to great lengths to allow
| illogical comparisons such as the one below.
| import xml as x
| x
| module 'xml' from
On Feb 29, 4:34 pm, Preston Landers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 29, 2:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a thread adds an object it creates to a nonlocal
collection, such as a class-static set, does it have to maintain a
list of all such objects, just to get the right ones destroyed
On Feb 28, 1:10 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:18:27 -0800, Jeff Schwab wrote:
Benoit wrote:
I've been teaching myself the python language over the past few months
using Mark Lutz' Learning Python, 3ed. Python is also the first
programming
On Feb 27, 8:47 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Robertson wrote the following on 02/27/2008 06:40 PM:
Hi,
I need a generator which produces all ways to place n indistinguishable
items into k distinguishable boxes.
My first thought was to generate all integer
On Feb 28, 2:30 am, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is time to show your cards or fold
Here. Run it. Download Python 3.0a2.
from thread import start_new_thread as launch
from threading import Lock
import time
from functools import partial
class WithObj:
def __init__( self,
On Feb 28, 12:46 am, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au wrote:
By the way bearophile... the readability of your posts will increase a
LOT if you break it up into paragraphs, rather than use one or two giant
run-on paragraphs.
My comments follow.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008
On Feb 28, 8:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the default behavior may become the true copy, that seems
simpler for a newbie to grasp. The language then may give a tool to
use references too (like passing arrays to functions in Pascal, you
can use var for pass-by-reference reference).
Do
I have a data structure I think would be very useful. It passes a few
test cases, but one attempt to optimize it failed, so that may
indicate a bug. Will anyone help me debug it, verify it, or clean it?
It pertains to multi-threading and is a synchro. structure. If it is
not an interest of
On Feb 28, 11:49 am, Ethan Metsger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all.
I apologize for what is perhaps a newb question. I'm in the process of
transitioning our testing framework from Perl to Python. While that alone
probably sets off some red flags, I'm afraid it's what I'm stuck with.
On Feb 27, 6:02 pm, Tamer Higazi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Can somebody of you make me a sample how to define a function based on
call by reference ???
I am a python newbie and I am not getting smart how to define functions,
that should modify the variable I passed by reference.
thanks
On Feb 28, 10:07 am, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, 5:02 am, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again for your efforts here. This particular problem didn't
appear in any course I took...certainly similar problems did.
And here's the obligatory
be.
To the OP: If you try C++, don't hold that crappy language against C#, D,
or Java. ;-)
What's the relevance of C#, D, or Java to the OP's post?
public static void synchronized flamewar() {}
virtual void flamewar() {}
def flamewar(): pass
[ castironpi has changed the newsgroup
On Feb 26, 11:45 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warning -- long post follows
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:17:54 -0800, Dennis Lee Bieber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
Which is, it seems, totally backwards... Also... to my knowledge,
On Feb 25, 7:44 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:28 pm, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1]http://www.martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/identityMap.html
[1] illustrates a case in which 'a is a' returns False, and in the
other corner of the
On Feb 27, 4:16 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:58:52 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It works to keep a reference to the object, then access the member
again. If your only reference to the object is the member itself,
obj.a= {} breaks d, but
On Feb 27, 9:03 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy Smith wrote the following on 02/27/2008 06:56 PM:
What course is this homework problem for?
None. I assume you have an answer to this *trivial* problem...
It's actually a very general question relating to a very specific
On Feb 27, 9:31 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Robertson wrote the following on 02/27/2008 06:40 PM:
I need a generator which produces all ways to place n indistinguishable
items into k distinguishable boxes.
I found:
On Feb 27, 8:40 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need a generator which produces all ways to place n indistinguishable
items into k distinguishable boxes.
For n=4, k=3, there are (4+3-1)!/(3-1)!/4! = 15 ways.
(0,0,4)
(0,4,0)
(4,0,0)
(0,2,2)
(2,0,2)
(2,2,0)
On Feb 27, 10:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 8:40 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need a generator which produces all ways to place n indistinguishable
items into k distinguishable boxes.
For n=4, k=3, there are (4+3-1)!/(3-1)!/4! = 15 ways.
On Feb 27, 10:41 pm, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:38 pm, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yield map(len, (''.join(s)).split('|'))
That line should have been just:
yield map(len, s.split('|'))
of course.
Mark
It's easier:
def
On Feb 27, 10:49 pm, Michael Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 02/27/2008 08:46 PM:
Just sort the list in text-ascending order, and it's pretty clear.
Indeed. After trying Mark's solution, I saw that it sorted in a very
nice manner.
You could also
On Feb 27, 10:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 10:41 pm, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:38 pm, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yield map(len, (''.join(s)).split('|'))
That line should have been just:
yield map(len,
On Feb 27, 10:38 pm, Dan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly are you wanting to do?
I'm having a hard time considering your question in the general case.
I'm thinking of too many cases, the details of which are relevant to
the answer, to even subdivide them. My specialty is specific
On Feb 25, 11:30 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:55:18 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
I'd like to do this:
a= list( range( 5 ) )
assert a== [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
for i in ref( a ):
i.ref*= 2
a=
Create a class which will ensure
turn-taking of events, using a get method with and integer index, by
waiting for the prior index to complete before starting the next.
from thread import start_new_thread as launch
from threading import Lock
import time
from functools import partial
class
On Feb 26, 8:14 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:02:12 -0800, bearophileHUGS wrote:
This is a real difference, that has real impact on the programs I
write, so I often use the if/else approach, despite the dict.get()
method being semantically
On Feb 26, 7:36 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the best praise of semantic indentation I have read so far, by
Chris
Okasaki:http://okasaki.blogspot.com/2008/02/in-praise-of-mandatory-indentatio...
A quotation:
Imagine my surprise when I started teaching this language and found the
On Feb 26, 8:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch:
I guess it's the method lookup that's the slow part. Factor it out of the
loop and measure again::
I did know of that optimization, but sometimes I forget about it...
The new timings:
Output timings, best of 3,
On Feb 26, 9:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why not b = copyonwrite( a )?
Subclass the interpreter-- make your own session.
Your idea may work, but I am talking about a new language (with some
small differences, not a revolution). Making such language efficient
enough
On Feb 26, 11:00 am, mrstephengross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I've got a list of tuples, like so:
( ('a', '1'), ('b', '2'), ('c', '3')
And I want to turn it into a dictionary in which the first value of
each tuple is a key and the second value is a value, like so:
{ 'a' - '1',
On Feb 26, 10:59 am, Preston Landers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 1:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two options occurred to me, which the first showed up in the earlier
extremely skeletal and cryptic post:
Perhaps you would be more likely to get the kind of help you seem to
want
On Feb 26, 11:37 am, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 10:59 am, Preston Landers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 1:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two options occurred to me, which the first showed up in the earlier
extremely skeletal and
On Feb 26, 12:04 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:37 am, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 10:59 am, Preston Landers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 1:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two options
On Feb 26, 11:27 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's Unpythonic to compile a machine instruction out of a script. But
maybe in the right situations, with the right constraints on a
function, certain chunks could be native, almost like a mini-
compilation. How much
Netherlands - 2006 Investment Climate Statement - The Netherlands
New anti-bribery legislation, ... The new anti-bribery law reconciles
the language of the OECD anti-bribery convention ... bribes are no
longer deductible for corporate tax purposes.
http://www.state.gov/e/eeb/ifd/2006/62022.htm
On Feb 26, 12:37 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 12:04 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:37 am, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 10:59 am, Preston Landers
On Feb 26, 11:15 am, mrstephengross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about this?
d = dict(tuples)
Aha! I hadn't realized it could be so simple.
--Steve
In terms of a metric for code, 'And runs in a single line!' may be a
bit deceptive. [Counterexample snipped.] Absent repeating the line
On Feb 26, 12:42 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 12:37 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 12:04 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:37 am, Jeff Schwab
On Feb 26, 1:11 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:49:00 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
I am not a troll. I want a sustainable, healthy, productive,
educational, informative relationship with frequenters
On Feb 26, 5:22 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven D'Aprano:
Usability for beginners is a good thing, but not at the expense of
teaching them the right way to do things. Insisting on explicit requests
before copying data is a *good* thing. If it's a gotcha for newbies,
that's just a
On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:49:00 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I'm not quite sure a semaphore is exactly the synchronization object
I'm looking for, but I'm a little new to concurrency myself.
The easiest way to implement a
On Feb 26, 1:11 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:58:52 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
The generic solution involves a second level of indirection: tuple* d=
obj.a. I can't land a clean solution to it though.
On Feb 26, 7:56 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Hai,
Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
threads. For eg:
Class A:
thread_init()
def
On Feb 26, 4:15 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 26, 12:42 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
th1 th2
set cmd
run cmd
get result
acknowledge
continue continue
th2 won't -run cmd- until th1 completes -set
On Feb 26, 2:17 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:39:04 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
The relevant snippet is:
def thloop( thd ):
while thd.cont:
with thd.step[1]:
if not
Netherlands - 2006 Investment Climate Statement - The Netherlands
This has NOTHING to do with comp.lang.python, and posts such as this
are the signs of spammers and trolls, and will rapidly lead to one being
kill-filed.
Biography
Van Rossum was born and grew up in the Netherlands
But this doesn't tell you anything about Python except that it's
flexible enough to construct counter-intuitive classes.
Everything you have been told is true for the normal cases you will come
across in everyday usage. If you want to play in the obscure corners of
the language that's fine,
On Feb 25, 1:33 am, Allen Peloquin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a personal project that has an elegant solution that requires
both true multiple inheritance of classes (which pretty much limits my
language choices to C++ and Python) and type-based function
overloading.
Now, while this
B1.fun(A(x), A(y), A(z)) == B.fun(A(x), A(y), A(z))
but
B1.fun(A1(x), A(y), A(z) != B.fun(A1(x), A(y), A(z))
Is there a data-structure solution or third party module that would
mimic this behavior?
'''
An Overloaded instance, B.xfun, is created in the base class of the
classes the members
{ '+': operator.add, '-': operator.sub, ... }
Then EXPR OPER EXPR - ops[ OPER ]( EXPR, EXPR ), right?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'd like to do this:
a= list( range( 5 ) )
assert a== [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
for i in ref( a ):
i.ref*= 2
a= deref( a )
assert a== [ 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 ]
In the for loop, i objects maintain their identities, while still
being reassigned. The first way I think of is this:
class Ref:
def __init__(
Specify
def thloop( th ):
while th.cont:
with th.step[2]:
th.ret= th.cmd+ 1
def acq( th ):
with th.step[1]:
th.cmd= 100
with th.step[3]:
ret1= th.ret
th.step.reset()
assert ret1== 101
Is it enough?
--
On Feb 25, 11:52 pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 9:30 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it enough?
(Reminds me of the movie Marathon Man, in which Dustin Hoffman is
repeatedly asked by Laurence Olivier, Is it safe? Hoffman had no
idea what Olivier was talking about.
Clarify:
def thdloop( thd ):
while thd.cont:
thd.sig1event.wait()
ret= thd.cmd()
thd.result= ret
thd.sig2event.set()
thd.seg3event.wait()
and
def consumer( thd ):
thd.cmd= function
thd.sig1event.set()
thd.sig2event.wait()
ret= thd.result
Can someone explain this?
a= {}
a[(3,)]= 0
(3,) in a
True
(3,) is (3,)
False
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 24, 7:58 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explain this?
a= {}
Create an empty dict and bind it to the name a.
a[(3,)]= 0
Set the key/value pair (3,):0 to the dict.
(3,) in a
Is (3,) one of the keys in the dict?
True
Yes, it
On Feb 24, 9:28 pm, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:58 pm, Jeff Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explain this?
a= {}
Create an empty dict and bind it to the name a.
To whoso has a serious interest in multi-threading:
What advanced thread techniques does Python support?
1) @synchronized
@synchronized
def function( arg ):
behavior()
Synchronized prevents usage from more than one caller at once: look up
the function in a hash, acquire its lock, and call.
@mainmethod
def main(...)
and like this:
@mainmethod(parser=myparser)
def main(...)
then you cannot use that decorator for a function that expects or
allows a function as its first argument? Because how and
If it's called with only one non-keyword parameter, then the language
might have
Corrections.
Typographical error in the implementation of #1.
def synchronized( func ):
def presynch( *ar, **kwar ):
with _synchlock:
lock= _synchhash.setdefault( func, allocate_lock() )
with lock:
return func( *ar, **kwar )
return presynch
On footnote #4,
On Feb 23, 6:19 pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 23, 2:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@synchronized
def function( arg ):
behavior()
Synchronized prevents usage from more than one caller at once: look up
the function in a hash, acquire
On Feb 23, 7:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:19 pm, Paul McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 23, 2:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@synchronized
def function( arg ):
behavior()
Synchronized prevents usage from more than one caller
On Feb 19, 7:52 pm, Gabriel Genellina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
En Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:19:29 -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
But 'ext' is actually good.
Even if it were, that alone doesn't mean it should be included in the
stdlib.
Start writting a recipe in the Python Cookbook:
On Feb 20, 1:14 pm, Kay Schluehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Feb., 04:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The printing press, rail, automobiles, and Python, were not in
prevalent use before their invention.
True but automobiles fuelled with newspapers and driven by Pythons
still aren't.
On Feb 20, 6:02 pm, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My writing isn't unclear
Please re-assess that statement in light of the dozens of responses
from many people in the last few weeks, telling you that your writing
*is* unclear.
For what it's worth, I've
Here is a construction for passing parameters. I include the Python
idea, a C/C++ equivalent, and write a little about it. (Blech.)
It is a little obscure, and my use cases are not as good as yours. So
say yours.
The presentation is structured: problem, solution.
Problem:
Sometimes you need
On Feb 20, 7:57 pm, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au wrote:
Trying to decipher the fractured, incoherent ramblings of castironpi has
lost it's amusement value. I no longer care whether the poster is a bot,
or a loser nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is with few social
On Feb 20, 4:42 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:37:23 -0800, Preston Landers wrote:
On Feb 19, 4:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But after reading some of your other recent posts on other topics, I'm
not confident that it was intended to make
On Feb 19, 8:20 pm, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 10:26 am, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason wrote:
Hmm. I must be the only person who doesn't think the double
underscores are ugly.
Nope. I like them too. :)
Frankly,
On Feb 19, 9:41 pm, Paddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 10:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Standardization helps avoid the readability and reliability problems
which arise when many different individuals create their own slightly
varying implementations, each with their own quirks
#include string
#include vector
This modification required:
compilercommand='c:/programs/mingw/bin/g++'
and
strctypes= { 'i': 'int', 's': 'const char*',
'O': 'PyObject*' }
The output is:
#include c:/programs/python/include/Python.h
[ user code ]
static PyObject *
The ice-cream example given earlier does /not/ fit the idea of a
tuple to me; Vanilla, Chocolate, and Strawberry isn't a tuple --
it's a list...
Flavor* flavors[]= { Vanilla, Chocolate, Strawberry };
flavorct= 3;
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 19, 5:17 am, Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diez B. Roggisch a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I'm a little dissatisfied, and just thinking aloud.
(snip remaining of mostly inarticulate post, just couldn't make sens of
it - as usual)
No idea what's wrong
On Feb 13, 4:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Standardization helps avoid the readability and reliability problems
which arise when many different individuals create their own slightly
varying implementations, each with their own quirks and naming
conventions.
Standardization allows RCA
On Feb 19, 3:15 pm, Carsten Haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, take this one. C is faster than Python. It would be useful, in
certain cases, to write C.
It is possible but inconvenient, out of the way.
Making that easier is a
On Feb 19, 12:37 am, George Sakkis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem did not seem to be miscommunication, rather bias.
IMHO it's partly because of the obscurity of the ideas and the code
you suggest, and partly because of the poor job you do
On Feb 19, 4:05 pm, Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Standardization allows RCA cables, bumpers, and 115V plugs. The Bill
of Rights allows Huckleberry Finn. What is the analogue of the Bill
of Rights for programmers and users, whether of programming
On Feb 15, 11:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 15, 8:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hold the future holds effectively nothing for single-threaded
programs; single-core PUs have reached the point of diminishing
returns of circuit size and IC design; thinking multi-threaded's the
Past a many-small certain point on numbers of hash-tables, if that's
the right word, in a program, and intepreter process on a machine, is
it be more time-efficient to allocate a 2**32-byte table? Are
'modulo' and 'doublesize' the only steps of the lookup process that it
would eliminate, and
On Feb 19, 3:47 pm, Gerardo Herzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Standardization allows RCA cables, bumpers, and 115V plugs. The Bill
of Rights allows Huckleberry Finn. What is the analogue of the Bill
of Rights for programmers and users, whether of programming languages
801 - 900 of 1029 matches
Mail list logo
