--
UTF-8, Unicode (consortium): 1 to 4 *Unicode Transformation Unit*
UTF-8, ISO 10646: 1 to 6 *Unicode Transformation Unit*
(still actual, unless tealy freshly modified)
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-
A coding scheme works with three sets. A *unique* set
of CHARACTERS, a *unique* set of CODE POINTS and a *unique*
set of ENCODED CODE POINTS, unicode or not.
The relation between the set of characters and the set of the
code points is a *human* table, created with a sheet of paper
and a
On 5 juin, 19:43, Νικόλαος Κούρας nikos.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ôç ÔåôÜñôç, 5 Éïõíßïõ 2013 8:56:36 ð.ì. UTC+3, ï ÷ñÞóôçò Steven D'Aprano
Ýãñáøå:
Somehow, I don't know how because I didn't see it happen, you have one or
more files in that directory where the file name as bytes is invalid when
On 2 juin, 20:09, Rick Johnson rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
I never purposely inject ANY superfluous cycles in my code except in
the case of testing or development. To me it's about professionalism.
Let's consider a thought exercise shall we?
The flexible string
On 31 mai, 00:19, alcyon st...@terrafirma.us wrote:
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:19:42 PM UTC-7, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 29May2013 13:14, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
| On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 PM, alcyon st...@terrafirma.us wrote:
| This notation displays hex values
On 30 mai, 20:42, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Mok-Kong Shen
mok-kong.s...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 27.05.2013 17:30, schrieb Ned Batchelder:
On 5/27/2013 10:45 AM, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
From an int one can use to_bytes to get its individual
On 20 mai, 19:56, Christian Gollwitzer aurio...@gmx.de wrote:
Oops, I thought we were posting to comp.dsp. Nevertheless, I think
numpy.fft does mixed-radix (can't check it now)
Am 20.05.13 19:50, schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
Am 20.05.13 19:23, schrieb jmfauth:
Non sense.
Dito
Non sense.
The discrete fft algorithm is valid only if the number of data
points you transform does correspond to a power of 2 (2**n).
Keywords to the problem: apodization, zero filling, convolution
product, ...
eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution
jmf
--
The handling of diacriticals is especially a nice case
study. One can use it to toy with some specific features of
Unicode, normalisation, decomposition, ...
... and also to show how Unicode can be badly implemented.
First and quick example that came to my mind (Py325 and Py332):
On 14 mai, 17:05, Christian Jurk co...@commx.ws wrote:
Hi folks,
This questions may be asked several times already, but the development of
relevant software continues day-for-day. For some time now I've been using
xhtml2pdf [1] to generate PDF documents from HTML templates (which are
On 8 mai, 15:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
Apropos to any of the myriad unicode threads that have been going on
recently:
http://xkcd.com/1209/
--
This reflects a lack of understanding of Unicode.
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 6 mai, 09:49, Fábio Santos fabiosantos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 May 2013 08:34, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Well you see, it was 70 bytes back in the Python 2 days (I'll defer to
Steven for data points earlier than that), but with Python 3, there
were two versions: one was
In a previous post,
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/6aec70817705c226#
,
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
“Is Unicode support so hard, especially in the 21st century?”
--
Unicode is not really complicate and it works very well (more
than two decades of
On 9 avr, 15:32, thomasancill...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm new to learning python and creating a basic program to convert units of
measurement which I will eventually expand upon but im trying to figure out
how to loop the entire program. When I insert a while loop it only loops the
first 2
On 4 avr, 03:36, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Although PEP 8 is only compulsory for the Python standard library, many
users like to stick to PEP 8 for external projects.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
With perhaps one glaring exception: many people
This FSR is wrong by design. A naive way to embrace Unicode.
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2 avr, 01:43, Neil Hodgson nhodg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Mark Lawrence:
You've given many examples of the same type of micro benchmark, not many
examples of different types of benchmark.
Trying to work out what jmfauth is on about I found what appears to
be a performance regression
On 2 avr, 10:03, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:24 PM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
An editor may reflect very well the example a gave. You enter
thousand ascii chars, then - boum - as you enter a non ascii
char, your editor (assuming is uses
On 2 avr, 10:35, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:03:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
So what? Who cares if it takes 0.2 second to insert a character
instead of 0.1 second? That's still a hundred times faster than you
can type.
On 2 avr, 16:03, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:58:11 +0100, Steve Simmons wrote:
I'm sure you didn't intend to be insulting, but some of us *have* taken
JMF seriously, at least at first. His repeated overblown claims of how
Python is
On 2 avr, 18:57, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 2, 8:17 pm, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Simmons (too many Steves!), I know you're new so don't have all the history
with jmf that many
of us do, but consider that the original post was about numbers, had
nothing to do
-
I'm not whining or and I'm not complaining (and never did).
I always exposed facts.
I'm not especially interested in Python, I'm interested in
Unicode.
Usualy when I posted examples, there are confirmed.
What I see is this (std download-abled Python's on Windows 7 (and
other
On 1 avr, 21:28, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:15 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Py32
import timeit
timeit.repeat('a' * 1000 + 'ẞ')
[0.7005365263669056, 0.6810694766790423, 0.6811978680727229]
timeit.repeat('a' * 1000 + 'z
--
Neil Hodgson:
The counter-problem is that a French document that needs to include
one mathematical symbol (or emoji) outside Latin-1 will double in size
as a Python string.
Serious developers/typographers/users know that you can not compose
a text in French with latin-1. This is now also
On 28 mar, 07:12, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 03/27/2013 08:49 PM, rusi wrote:
In particular You are a liar is as bad as You are an idiot
The same statement can be made non-abusively thus: ... is not true
because ...
I don't agree. With all the posts and micro benchmarks
On 28 mar, 11:30, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:03 PM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
-
You really REALLY need to sort out in your head the difference between
correctness and performance. I still haven't seen one single piece of
evidence from you
On 28 mar, 14:01, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 23:11:55 +1100, Neil Hodgson wrote:
Ian Foote:
One benefit of
UTF-8 over Python's flexible representation is that it is, on average,
more compact over a wide set of samples.
Sure. And
On 28 mar, 15:38, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:12 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
This flexible string representation is so absurd that not only
it does not know you can not write Western European Languages
with latin-1, it penalizes you by just
On 28 mar, 16:14, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 mar, 15:38, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:12 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
This flexible string representation is so absurd that not only
it does not know you can not write
Chris,
Your problem with int/long, the start of this thread, is
very intersting.
This is not a demonstration, a proof, rather an illustration.
Assume you have a set of integers {0...9} and an operator,
let say, the addition.
Idea.
Just devide this set in two chunks, {0...4} and {5...9}
and
On 28 mar, 17:33, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:34 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
The flexible string representation takes the problem from the
other side, it attempts to work with the characters by using
their representations and it (can only
On 28 mar, 18:55, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:48 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
If Python had imlemented Unicode correctly, there would
be no difference in using an a, é, € or any character,
what the narrow builds did.
I'm not following your
On 28 mar, 21:29, Benjamin Kaplan benjamin.kap...@case.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:48 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 mar, 17:33, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:34 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
The flexible string
On 28 mar, 22:11, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 mar, 21:29, Benjamin Kaplan benjamin.kap...@case.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:48 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 mar, 17:33, Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:34 AM
On 26 mar, 22:08, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
I think we all agree that jmf is a character.
--
The characters are also intrisic characteristics of a
group in the Group Theory.
If you are not a mathematician, but eg a scientist in
need of these characters, they are
On 25 mar, 22:51, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The Python 3 merge of int and long has effectively penalized
small-number arithmetic by removing an optimization. As we've seen
from PEP 393 strings (jmf aside), there can be huge benefits from
having a single type with multiple
On 26 mar, 20:03, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:50 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 mar, 22:51, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
The Python 3 merge of int and long has effectively penalized
small-number arithmetic by removing
On 23 mar, 17:17, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 23/03/2013 09:24, jmfauth wrote:
On 20 mar, 22:02, Tim Delaney tim.dela...@aptare.com wrote:
On 21 March 2013 06:40, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip usual rant from jmf]
It has been acknowledged
On 20 mar, 22:02, Tim Delaney tim.dela...@aptare.com wrote:
On 21 March 2013 06:40, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip usual rant from jmf]
It has been acknowledged as a real regression, but he keeps hijacking every
thread where strings are mentioned to harp on about it. He
On 21 mar, 04:12, rusi rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 12:40 am, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Courageous people can try to do something with the unicode
collation algorithm (see unicode.org). Some time ago, for the fun,
I wrote something (not perfect) with a reduced
On 20 mar, 11:38, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:29:35 -0700 (PDT), jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 mar, 10:30, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:09:06 -0700 (PDT), jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com
On 20 mar, 11:29, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 mar, 10:30, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com wrote:
-
Strangely, I had not problem (if I recall correctly) with a
very basic application (QMainWindow + QLineEdit).
ADDENDUM, CORRECTION
It fails too. I forgot to rename
On 20 mar, 01:12, D. Xenakis gouzouna...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Im searching for an installation guide for PyQt toolkit.
To be honest im very confused about what steps should i follow for a complete
and clean installation. Should i better choose to install the 32bit or the
64bit
On 20 mar, 10:30, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.com wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:09:06 -0700 (PDT), jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 mar, 01:12, D. Xenakis gouzouna...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Im searching for an installation guide for PyQt toolkit
Courageous people can try to do something with the unicode
collation algorithm (see unicode.org). Some time ago, for the fun,
I wrote something (not perfect) with a reduced keys table (see
unicode.org), only a keys subset for some scripts hold in memory.
It works with Py32 and Py33. In an
--
utf-32 is already here. You are all most probably [*]
using it without noticing it. How? By using OpenType fonts,
without counting the text processing applications using them.
Why? Because there is no other way to do it.
[*] depending of the font, the internal table(s), eg cmap table,
are
As a reply to rusi's comment:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/a7689b158fdca29e#
From string creation to the itertools usage. A medley. Some timings.
Important:
The real/absolute values of these experiments are not important. I do
not care and I'm not
On 11 mar, 03:06, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
...
By teaching 'speed before correctness, this site promotes bad
programming habits and thinking (and the use of low-level but faster
languages).
...
This is exactly what your flexible string representation
does!
And away from
On 6 mar, 15:03, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
In article c2184b42-41be-4930-9501-361296df7...@googlegroups.com,
fa...@squashclub.org wrote:
Instead of:
1.8e-04
I need:
1.8e-004
So two zeros before the 4, instead of the default 1.
Just out of curiosity, what's the use case
Fascinating software.
Some are building, some are destroying.
Py33
timeit.repeat({1:'abc需'})
[0.2573893570572636, 0.24261832285651508, 0.24259548003601594]
Py323
timeit.repeat({1:'abc需'})
[0.11000708521282831, 0.0994753634273593, 0.09901023634051853]
jmf
--
On 27 fév, 09:21, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Fascinating software.
Some are building, some are destroying.
Py33 timeit.repeat({1:'abc需'})
[0.2573893570572636, 0.24261832285651508, 0.24259548003601594]
Py323
timeit.repeat({1:'abc需'})
[0.11000708521282831
On 27 fév, 23:24, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:21 AM, jmfauth hijacked yet another thread:
Some are building, some are destroying.
We are still waiting for you to help build a better 3.3+, instead of
trying to 'destroy' it with mostly irrelevant cherry-picked
On 23 fév, 15:26, Devin Jeanpierre jeanpierr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm pretty unsure of myself when it comes to unicode. As I understand
it, you're generally supposed to compare things in a case insensitive
manner by case folding, right? So instead of a.lower() == b.lower()
(the
On 23 fév, 16:43, Steve Simmons square.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/02/2013 22:37, piterrr.dolin...@gmail.com wrote: So far I am getting
the impression
...
My main message to you would be : don't approach Python with a negative
attitude, give it a chance and I'm sure you'll come to enjoy
On 23 fév, 20:08, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 02/23/2013 10:44 AM, jmfauth wrote:
[snip various stupidities]
jmf
Peter, jmfauth is one of our resident trolls. Feel free to ignore him.
--
~Ethan~
Sorry, what can say?
More memory and slow down!
If you see a progress, I'm
On 13 fév, 21:24, 8 Dihedral dihedral88...@googlemail.com wrote:
Rick Johnson於 2013年2月14日星期四UTC+8上午12時34分11秒寫道：
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:10:14 AM UTC-6, jmfauth wrote:
d = {ord('a'): 'A', ord('b'): '2', ord('c'): 'C'}
'abcdefgabc'.translate(d)
'A2CdefgA2C
On 13 fév, 06:26, Rick Johnson rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:44:09 PM UTC-6, Rick Johnson wrote:
REFERENCES:
[1]: Should
On 7 fév, 04:04, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:55:58 -0800, Demian Brecht wrote:
Well, an alternative /could/ be:
...
py s = 'http://alongnameofasite1234567.com/q?sports=runa=1b=1'
py assert u2f(s) == mangle(s)
py
py from timeit import
Mea culpa. I had not my head on my shoulders.
Inputing if working fine, it returns text correctly.
However, and this is something different, I'm a little
bit surprised, input() does not handle escaped characters
(\u, \U).
Workaround: encode() and decode() as raw-unicode-escape.
jmf
--
On Jun 20, 1:21 am, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:00:01 -0700, jmfauth wrote:
On 18 juin, 12:11, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:30:50 -0700, jmfauth wrote:
On 18 juin, 10:28
On Jun 20, 11:22 am, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 18.06.2012 20:45, schrieb Terry Reedy:
The simultaneous reintroduction of 'ur', but with a different meaning
than in 2.7, *was* a problem and it should be removed in the next release.
On Jun 19, 9:54 pm, Edward C. Jones edcjo...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/19/2012 12:41 PM, Hemanth H.M wrote:
float.hex(x)
'0x1.5p+3'
Some days I don't ask the brightest questions. Suppose x was a numpy
floating scalar (types numpy.float16, numpy.float32, numpy.float64, or
What is input() supposed to return?
u'a' == 'a'
True
r1 = input(':')
:a
r2 = input(':')
:u'a'
r1 == r2
False
type(r1), len(r1)
(class 'str', 1)
type(r2), len(r2)
(class 'str', 4)
---
sys.argv?
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18 juin, 10:28, Benjamin Kaplan benjamin.kap...@case.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:19 AM, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
What is input() supposed to return?
u'a' == 'a'
True
r1 = input(':')
:a
r2 = input(':')
:u'a'
r1 == r2
False
type(r1), len(r1)
(class 'str
On 18 juin, 12:11, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 02:30:50 -0700, jmfauth wrote:
On 18 juin, 10:28, Benjamin Kaplan benjamin.kap...@case.edu wrote:
The u prefix is only there to
make it easier to port a codebase from Python 2 to Python 3
Thinks are very clear to me. I wrote enough interactive
interpreters with all available toolkits for Windows
since I know Python (v. 1.5.6).
I do not see why the semantic may vary differently
in code source or in an interactive interpreter,
esp. if Python allow it!
If you have to know by advance
We are turning in circles. You are somehow
legitimating the reintroduction of unicode
literals and I shew, not to say proofed, it may
be a source of problems.
Typical Python desease. Introduce a problem,
then discuss how to solve it, but surely and
definitivly do not remove that problem.
As far
On Jun 18, 8:45 pm, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 6/18/2012 12:39 PM, jmfauth wrote:
We are turning in circles.
You are, not we. Please stop.
You are somehow legitimating the reintroduction of unicode
literals
We are not 'reintroducing' unicode literals. In Python 3, string
On 17 juin, 13:30, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 16.06.2012 19:36, schrieb jmfauth:
Please consistency.
Python 3.3 supports the ur syntax just as Python 2.x:
$ ./python
Python 3.3.0a4+ (default:4c704dc97496, Jun 16 2012, 00:06:09)
[GCC 4.6.3] on linux
Type help, copyright
On 17 juin, 15:48, Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 14:11, schrieb jmfauth:
I noticed this at the 3.3.0a0 realease.
The main motivation for this came from this:
http://bugs.python.org/issue13748
PS I saw the dev-list message.
PS2 Opinion, if not really useful
Please consistency.
sys.version
'3.3.0a4 (v3.3.0a4:7c51388a3aa7+, May 31 2012, 20:15:21) [MSC v.1600
32 bit (Intel)]'
'a'
'a'
b'a'
b'a'
br'a'
b'a'
rb'a'
b'a'
u'a'
'a'
ur'a'
'a'
ru'a'
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 30 mai, 13:54, Thomas Rachel nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-
a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de wrote:
Am 30.05.2012 08:52 schrieb ru...@yahoo.com:
This breaks a lot of my code because in python 2
re.split (ur'[\u3000]', u'A\u3000A') == [u'A', u'A']
but in python 3 (the
On 30 mai, 08:52, ru...@yahoo.com ru...@yahoo.com wrote:
In python2, \u escapes are processed in raw unicode
strings. That is, ur'\u3000' is a string of length 1
consisting of the IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE unicode character.
In python3, \u escapes are not processed in raw strings.
r'\u3000' is a
On 17 mai, 21:32, Marco marc...@nsgmail.com wrote:
Is it normal the str.isnumeric() returns False for these Cuneiforms?
'\U00012456'
'\U00012457'
'\U00012432'
'\U00012433'
They are all in the Nl category.
Indeed there are, but Unicode (ver. 5.0.0) does not assign numeric
values to these
On 18 mai, 17:08, Marco Buttu name.surn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/17/2012 09:32 PM, Marco wrote:
Is it normal the str.isnumeric() returns False for these Cuneiforms?
'\U00012456'
'\U00012457'
'\U00012432'
'\U00012433'
They are all in the Nl category.
Marco
It's ok, I found
On 18 mai, 17:08, Marco Buttu name.surn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/17/2012 09:32 PM, Marco wrote:
Is it normal the str.isnumeric() returns False for these Cuneiforms?
'\U00012456'
'\U00012457'
'\U00012432'
'\U00012433'
They are all in the Nl category.
Marco
It's ok, I found
On 16 mai, 17:48, Marco marc...@nsgmail.com wrote:
Hi all, because
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it,
there should be a difference between the two methods in the subject, but
I can't find it:
'123'.isdecimal(), '123'.isdigit()
(True, True)
For those who do not know:
The u'' string literal trick has never worked in Python 2.
sys.version
'2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
print u'Un oeuf à zéro EURO uro'
Un uf à zéro uro
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 29 fév, 14:45, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
For those who do not know:
The u'' string literal trick has never worked in Python 2.
sys.version
'2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]' print
u'Un oeuf à zéro EURO uro'
Un uf à zéro uro
jmf
Sorry
On 25 fév, 23:51, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:25:37 -0800, jmfauth wrote:
(2.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+1'
(4.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+2'
(1.5).hex()
'0x1.8p+0'
(1.1).hex()
'0x1.1999ap+0'
jmf
(2.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+1'
(4.0).hex()
'0x1.0p+2'
(1.5).hex()
'0x1.8p+0'
(1.1).hex()
'0x1.1999ap+0'
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 23 fév, 15:06, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Following instructions here:
http://docs.python.org/py3k/distutils/builtdist.html#creating-windows...
I am trying to create a Windows installer for a pure-module distribution
using Python 3.2. I get a LookupError:
On 16 fév, 01:18, Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks, often times in science one expresses a value (say
1.03789291) and its error (say 0.00089) in a short way by parentheses
like so: 1.0379(9)
Before swallowing any Python solution, you should
realize, the values
On 17 fév, 11:03, Daniel Fetchinson fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi folks, often times in science one expresses a value (say
1.03789291) and its error (say 0.00089) in a short way by parentheses
like so: 1.0379(9)
Before swallowing any Python solution, you should
realize, the values
On 13 fév, 04:09, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
* The new internal unicode scheme for 3.3 is pretty much a mixture of
the 3 storage formats (I am of course, skipping some details) by using
the widest one needed for each string. The advantage is avoiding
problems with each of the three.
There is so much to say on the subject, I do not know
where to start. Some points.
Today, Sunday, 12 February 2012, 90%, if not more, of the
Python applications supposed to work with text and I'm toying
with are simply not working. Two reasons:
1) Most of the devs understand nothing or not
On 2 fév, 11:03, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2012 12:51 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:47:22 +, Andrea Crotti wrote:
Yes they are exactly the same, because in that file I just write exactly
the same list,
but when modifying it at
On 1 fév, 17:15, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
So suppose I want to modify the sys.path on the fly before running some code
which imports from one of the modules added.
at run time I do
sys.path.extend(paths_to_add)
but it still doesn't work and I get an import error.
If
In short: if you need to write system scripts on Unix, and you need them
to work reliably, you need to stick with Python 2.x.
I think, understanding the coding of the characters helps a bit.
I can not figure out how the example below could not be
done on other systems.
D:\tmpchcp
Page de
On 13 jan, 20:04, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
With NaN, it is possible to get a list that will not properly sort:
-- NaN = float('nan')
-- spam = [1, 2, NaN, 3, NaN, 4, 5, 7, NaN]
-- sorted(spam)
[1, 2, nan, 3, nan, 4, 5, 7, nan]
I'm constructing a Null object with the semantics
On 11 jan, 01:56, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 1/10/2012 8:43 AM, jmfauth wrote:
D:\c:\python32\python.exe
Python 3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win
32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
'\u5de5'.encode
On 11 jan, 01:56, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 1/10/2012 8:43 AM, jmfauth wrote:
...
mbcs encodes according to the current codepage. Only the chinese
codepage(s) can encode the chinese char. So the unicode error is correct
and 2.7 has a bug in that it is doing errors='replace
1) If I copy/paste these CJK chars from Google Groups in two of my
interactive
interpreters (no dos/cmd console), I have no problem.
import unicodedata as ud
ud.name('工')
'CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-5DE5'
ud.name('具')
'CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-5177'
hex(ord(('工')))
'0x5de5'
hex(ord('具'))
'0x5177'
On 10 jan, 11:53, 8 Dihedral dihedral88...@googlemail.com wrote:
Terry Reedy於 2012年1月10日星期二UTC+8下午4時08分40秒寫道：
I get the same error running 3.2.2 under IDLE but not when pasting into
Command Prompt. However, Command Prompt may be cheating by replacing the
Chinese chars with '??' upon
On 10 jan, 13:28, jmfauth wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Addendum, Python console (dos box)
D:\c:\python32\python.exe
Python 3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win
32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
'\u5de5'.encode('utf-8')
b'\xe5
On 6 jan, 11:03, Ivan i...@llaisdy.com wrote:
Dear All
I'm developing a python application for which I need to support a
non-standard character encoding (specifically ISO 6937/2-1983, Addendum
1-1989). Here are some of the properties of the encoding and its use in
the application:
- I
On 3 déc, 04:54, Antti J Ylikoski antti.yliko...@tkk.fi wrote:
Helsinki, Finland, the EU
sys.version
'2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
'éléphant'
'\xe9l\xe9phant'
sys.version
'3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]'
On 6 oct, 06:39, Greg gregor.hochsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
Brilliant! It worked. Thanks!
Here is the final code for those who are struggling with similar
problems:
## open and decode file
# In this case, the encoding comes from the charset argument in a meta
tag
# e.g. meta
On 12 sep, 23:39, Rhodri James rho...@wildebst.demon.co.uk wrote:
Now read what Steven wrote again. The issue is that the program contains
characters that are syntactically illegal. The engine can be perfectly
correctly translating a character as a smart quote or a non breaking space
On 13 sep, 10:15, Steven D'Aprano steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
The intrinsic coding of the characters is one thing,
The usage of bytes stream supposed to represent a text
is one another thing,
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
