On Jun 14, 3:27 pm, Aaron Brady wrote:
> Hi, please forgive the multi-posting on this general topic.
>
> Some time ago, I recommended a pursuit of keeping 'persistent
> composite' types on disk, to be read and updated at other times by
> other processes. Databases provide this functionality, with
>
> If the OP takes this idea to python-ideas, chances are he'll be told to take
> the concept here first, for feedback, before python-ideas.
>
> More comments below:
>
> > kindly wrote:
> >> I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find whe
On Jun 14, 12:25 pm, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
> kindly wrote:
> > Am I crazy to think this is a good idea? I have not looked deeply
> > pythons grammer to see if it conflicts with anything, but on the
> > surface it look
I am sure people have thought of this before, but I cant find where.
I think that python should adapt a way of defining different types of
mapping functions by proceeding a letter before the curly brackets.
i.e ordered = o{}, multidict = m{} (like paste multidict). So you
could define an order
